Breaking
Hoover was right - USC crapped the bed. Not only is Kiffin a maniacal and loathsome scumbag, but he's a mediocre coach with NCAA baggage going to a program that's facing pretty serious allegations.
It's been fun USC, make way for the Ducks and Dawgs.
Agreed, great staff. Unfortunately you need a head coach that can control the assistants and players and USC just hired a guy that can't even control himself.They sure did get an interesting staff though. Chow is leaving UCLA to return to SC, and they get Orgeron and Monte Kiffin.
But yeah, Kiffin was in hot water with the NCAA right away, Orgeron was had issues when he was a HC at Ole Miss, not exactly a staff of choir boys.
We'll see if I'm a recruit I still want to know what the NCAA does before I commit.
I guess I'll just disagree with everybody here and say I think this was a good hire. I think SC is going to get slapped on the wrist and SC and Kiffen will be good together in the long run. He is a good offensive mind and an amazing recruiter. I don't ever see the NCAA really cracking down one of their glamour programs like SC and Kiffin will be there on the other side with his all star staff.
I think Tennessee should be upset as Kiffin is a good coach and I'll be interested to see whom they pursue.
I think Tennessee should be upset as Kiffin is a good coach and I'll be interested to see whom they pursue.
Kiffin has proven he can recruit - when he breaks the rules.
His value running an offense is highly debatable, Carroll and Sark ran him off for a reason.
Based on what evidence? So far he's been hired on his reputation under Carroll, because we all know his teams have crapped the field. His experience as a head coach consists of:
- 1.3 seasons with the Oakland Raiders where he was 5-15.
- 1 season at UT where he was 7-6
His biggest claim to fame is he was the youngest head coach in both NFL and NCAA FBS history.
I have great respect for Monte Kiffin and Norm Chow, but they won't be the one running the show. That will be the brat in the visor spouting off about stuff he has no clue about when anyone puts a mic or a camera in his face.
FWIW, in my 40 years USC has only had one coach who failed to recruit SoCal well, and that was Tollner. Soft head coach with a soft staff. Tollner's disinterest in recruiting is what set up ASU's first Rose Bowl run and gave UW and Oregon a foothold into the LA market. Even Larry Smith, who Mao can tell you couldn't help but start crying when someone put a camera in his face, recruited fairly well and set up Robo II.
Well i'll build my case.
First he was hired at those two stops for a reason. Oakland is an untenable situation. I think every one would admit that. Just look at what Norv Turner has done with a better infrastrucuture in place. So I throw that out the door.
Then at Tennessee he was 7-6 but destroyed rival Georgia, and played tough two far superior teams on the road in Alabama and Florida.
Plus he made an absolute piece of crap in Crompton look some what servicable. There was progress.
Let's not forget Sabans first year in the SEC in which he went 7-6 and lost to freaking SW Alabama or some Division 2 program. Obviously Saban had had prior NCAA success, but he is older and was an absolute bust in Miami. Took him a year and we all know Lane can recruit and was in the process of locking up a Top 5 class at Tennessee. They were on their way.
I actually think Sarkasian is massively overatted. He went 4-7 with the #1 NFL prospect under center and as all us UA fans know they should have been 3-8. After Kiffin was "pushed out" (link Mao? - seems to me like he took a better job?) the USC offense was never the same.
See here:
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/stewart_mandel/01/12/kiffin.usc/index.html?eref=sihp
In his first USC stint, Kiffin proved to be an excellent talent evaluator and called plays (along with current Washington coach Steve Sarkisian) for the 2005 Matt Leinart-Reggie Bush offense that averaged 580 yards and 49 points per game.
So he has assemebled an All star staff, knows Pac-10 and LA, knows offense, and is young and up and coming. As I already stated I think SC will get slapped on the wrist and Lane will likely stay on the straigh and narrow intially. Does he blur the lines from time to time? Sure but most coaches in NCAA do and that who hostess thing doesn't seem as bad as people make it out to be. And that was the biggest piece of evidence on why he is shady.
If you ask me Urban Meyer is a much bigger slime ball and if you think UF is clean you are kidding yourself.
Basically I think he was a good young prospect for SC to get who has ties and will carry on the Carroll legacy.
Will he most definitely be a success? I don't know. But as detailed above alot of the pieces are in place.
I think alot of people just don't like him and his overall cocky demeanor ( I in fact do like it) and want to see him fail and are probably a little bias. Lord knows he is getting killed right now for leaving the legendary SEC.
I like the hire.
He's imploring recruits at USC to honor their commitment while Ed Orgeron is in Tenn imploring UT recruits scheduled to start classes today at UT to NOT enroll and instead come with us to USC. That's complete hypocrisy.