Goodyear Card
Link Guy
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2006
- Posts
- 2,327
- Reaction score
- 2,054

Michael Bidwill Unlikely to Make Kliff Kingsbury the Scapegoat
Cardinals owner isn’t expected to fire his head coach

Pretty sure @Kerouc is Walter![]()
Michael Bidwill Unlikely to Make Kliff Kingsbury the Scapegoat
Cardinals owner isn’t expected to fire his head coachwww.revengeofthebirds.com
So that would imply KK is then, in fact, going to get fired? Going with the opposite Cramer logic of course.Is Mitch the Jim Cramer of sports reporting?
Did he drop BBs name to replace Kingsbury?Walter Mitchell - 'the insider'.
So football fan fiction?This is just more Walter fantasy
ooo... I like that, a genre is born.So football fan fiction?
I honestly think Floria’s assessment on Kliffys contract is accurate. I’d wager there is little guaranteed money beyond this year, very incentive basedI hope this is true!
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
I hope this is true!
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
where is this actually written? I take that back it appears the assumed notion is that they are but I can’t find any rule saying they have to be?Narrator: It is not.
What Florio keeps not talking about is that HC contracts are always guaranteed. It's a league wide owners agreement. 100% of the time.
Keim might not be but he only gets paid a couple mil a year.
Assertion not in evidence. Keim probably gets paid just as much if not marginally more than Kliff.Narrator: It is not.
What Florio keeps not talking about is that HC contracts are always guaranteed. It's a league wide owners agreement. 100% of the time.
Keim might not be but he only gets paid a couple mil a year.
If Graziano is right, there's more to the contract structure than what's revealed on OverTheCap.com, which shows so much dead money that a trade would be inconceivable before 2024-2025. Interesting....ESPN's Dan Graziano took a look at 12 different quarterback contracts - ranging from Aaron Rodgers to Jimmy Garoppolo - in discussed how complicated it would be (salary wise) to move them.
Murray's new deal does complicate things down the road, but there is a window that would be optimal for a deal says Graziano.
"The key date for the Cardinals is the start of the 2024 league year, at which time nearly $31 million in guaranteed 2025 salary and bonuses becomes fully guaranteed. If the Cardinals decide to cut Murray after the 2023 season, they'll have paid him $103.3 million for two years of service and they'd incur a dead-money cap hit of about $81.5 million in 2024 (or, if they cut him post-June 1, $48.3 million in 2024 and $33.2 million in 2025)," said Graziano.
"If the Cardinals want to trade Murray after this season, and if they were able to do so before picking up the 2023 option, they would carry just a $23.228 million dead-money charge on their 2023 cap. But that would require them to persuade a team to take on a contract that pays Murray a guaranteed $75 million or so over the next two years."
Just as players have complicated clauses and bonuses written into their contracts, so do coaches. The main difference is that coaches always have guaranteed contracts. If the team is doing well, the contract could be extended. If the team is doing badly, the coach can be dropped at any time.Oct 4, 2022where is this actually written? I take that back it appears the assumed notion is that they are but I can’t find any rule saying they have to be?
ahem. i feel robbedxc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media