2007-2008 Season Starting FS

abomb

Registered User
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2003
Posts
21,836
Reaction score
1
Griffith or Francisco?

Griffith has been playing good football in the last 6 games but Francisco is a young FS who plays his ass off. Who do you want starting next season?

I am convinced that Griff will retire.

I love Francisco, but dont think he is our starter at FS next year.
 

The Commish

youknowhatimsayin?
Joined
Jun 16, 2004
Posts
2,201
Reaction score
11
Location
San Francisco
I think our new coach will put Rolle at FS. He's just not a good cover corner. I heart Francisco though, the kid brings it every play.
 

Pariah

H.S.
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
18
Location
The Aventine
If our new coach put Rolle in at FS I think everyone would like that except maybe Antrel. Remember Corey Chavous?
I'm starting to come around to that line of thinking. But, we'd need at least one new starter at CB, and probably at least one more nickle/backup.

Like it or not, Rolle is arguably our best CB right now.
 

BigRedRage

Reckless
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2005
Posts
48,274
Reaction score
12,525
Location
SE valley
francisco should be, hes a pro bowl alternate with tons of hustle
 

General Chaos

Gronko = Man Beast
Joined
Mar 3, 2003
Posts
934
Reaction score
42
Location
Dallas
I really dont like the idea of either Francisco or Griffith being our FS next year. We really need a ball hawk that can cover. Wilson is the run stopping S. I really like Reggie Nelson out of Florida.
 

joeshmo

Kangol Hat Aficionado
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Posts
17,247
Reaction score
1
hes still good enough to have made the pro bowl right? and hes good at FS. Hes definatley not bad.

At this point in time I would have to say that is debatable that he is a good FS right now. He has to tools to get better but right now he isnt. We lead the laegue in over 20 yard pass plays and Fransisco has been apart of that as he has gotten a lot of playing time as a nickel DB. Including getting torched on some plays that the camera would point out. Maybe he gets better with more experiance and better coaching but right now I wont just rest on that fact and will want to upgrade the position ASAP.

I do keep Fransisco though for depth and special teams without question. I would also like to re-sign Griffith to be a backup and role player Behind Wilson at SS. Griffith still has some pop in him and he seen as a good leader. He should also be cheap and we currently dont have anyone behind Wilson as well. So if we keep Fransisco, Grifith, and add a viable starting FS to the mix I will be very happy.
 

Mr.Dibbs

Cap Casualty
Joined
Aug 12, 2003
Posts
3,806
Reaction score
50
Location
ARIZONA
Griffith came here because of Green, so I don't see him resigning if Green is gone. Griffith could start for half the teams in the league, and would be valuable no matter where he goes, so if I was him I'd sign on cheap with a Superbowl contender to finish out my career there, like Indy.
 

Pariah

H.S.
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
18
Location
The Aventine
Griffith came here because of Green, so I don't see him resigning if Green is gone. Griffith could start for half the teams in the league, and would be valuable no matter where he goes, so if I was him I'd sign on cheap with a Superbowl contender to finish out my career there, like Indy.
Is Griffith's contract up after this season?
 

Goodyear Card

Link Guy
Joined
Mar 4, 2006
Posts
2,195
Reaction score
1,859
Yes, he signed a two year deal.
Rolle should be better next year. He was playing pretty good in his rookie year until he had the knee injury. The reason for his poor play this year may be lingering effects of the knee injury and the lack of conditioning in the off season. Both him and Green will improve with a new DB coach.
 

devilfan02

Registered
Joined
Nov 12, 2005
Posts
3,399
Reaction score
0
Location
Scottsdale, AZ
Rolle should be better next year. He was playing pretty good in his rookie year until he had the knee injury. The reason for his poor play this year may be lingering effects of the knee injury and the lack of conditioning in the off season. Both him and Green will improve with a new DB coach.

Thats a HUGE assumption.......
 

Redsz

We do this together
Joined
Jan 21, 2004
Posts
4,885
Reaction score
2,426
Rolle is not suited for off-coverage, period. Hopefully the next DC will allow him to use his physical tools more effectivley.
 

abomb

Registered User
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2003
Posts
21,836
Reaction score
1
Ha! This was written 04/10/05;

Miami (Fla.)'s Antrel Rolle, who brings a physical, in-your-face style, is regarded as the No. 1 cornerback on many teams' draft boards. But there's debate when considering his lack of blazing speed (4.49 to 4.52 seconds for 40 yards). "A lot has been written about Rolle's speed," Houston Texans GM Charley Casserly says. "Some people have projected him to safety. You think about guys like Ty Law, (Patrick) Surtain and (Sam) Madison. None of them were big speed guys. They all ran 4.5s. They've all gone on to numerous Pro Bowls. Rolle, I think, will be that style of corner." ...

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/football/2005draft/2005-04-10-profile-cbs_x.htm
 

Cbus cardsfan

Back to Back ASFN FFL Champion
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
21,467
Reaction score
7,641
Ha! This was written 04/10/05;

Miami (Fla.)'s Antrel Rolle, who brings a physical, in-your-face style, is regarded as the No. 1 cornerback on many teams' draft boards. But there's debate when considering his lack of blazing speed (4.49 to 4.52 seconds for 40 yards). "A lot has been written about Rolle's speed," Houston Texans GM Charley Casserly says. "Some people have projected him to safety. You think about guys like Ty Law, (Patrick) Surtain and (Sam) Madison. None of them were big speed guys. They all ran 4.5s. They've all gone on to numerous Pro Bowls. Rolle, I think, will be that style of corner." ...

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/football/2005draft/2005-04-10-profile-cbs_x.htm

Those guys can't be any good, they're not fast.That's the sole barometer to being a good CB to many people.
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
63,617
Reaction score
58,074
Location
SoCal
Those guys can't be any good, they're not fast.That's the sole barometer to being a good CB to many people.

though being blazing fast would be my preference, i define a good cb to be a guy who can shut down the field in pass defense and come up with game-changing takeaways. rolle is slow and does not take away half the field or come up with many game-changing takeaways. i'll be patient with him as it was his first full season at cb, but i'm skeptical. he's certainly not the typical mercurial U product.
 

Goldfield

Formally known as BEERZ
Joined
Sep 13, 2002
Posts
10,505
Reaction score
2,326
Location
ASFN
Speed is nice but it is more about talent. If he had the talent to be a gifted CB then it would show atleast in some spots. He looks like an average CB that gets burned alot & makes way too much contact down field...

There is no doubt the guy is physically gifted and has skills, but I dont think he can ever be more than a average #2 CB in the NFL. But I do think he has a shot at being a freak at either S position where he can do more roaming and not just chasing a WR all play long.
 
Top