2024 Draft Countdown/NFL Prospects thread

oaken1

Stone Cold
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
18,171
Reaction score
16,243
Location
Modesto, California
Wait—when did they compete without Carson Palmer and Kurt Warner at QB?
right? The only thing Larry gave us was someone to root for and flashes of greatness amongst years of meh...
and the knowledge of exactly where the ball was gonna go on third and nine.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,389
Reaction score
29,775
Location
Gilbert, AZ
right? The only thing Larry gave us was someone to root for and flashes of greatness amongst years of meh...
and the knowledge of exactly where the ball was gonna go on third and nine.
Joe Thomas was a higher-level player at a more valuable position.

I appreciate Larry’s time here and he’s the main Cardinal most people will remember, but if anything he highlights that a great WR chosen with a high pick is still a dependent position if the franchise is going to go anywhere.
 

oaken1

Stone Cold
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
18,171
Reaction score
16,243
Location
Modesto, California
Joe Thomas was a higher-level player at a more valuable position.

I appreciate Larry’s time here and he’s the main Cardinal most people will remember, but if anything he highlights that a great WR chosen with a high pick is still a dependent position if the franchise is going to go anywhere.
because he cant even elevate a poor QB if that QB does not have time to make the pass. though we did see lots of chuck it up to Larry and pray as our QB went down, lol
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,283
Reaction score
40,297
Location
Colorado
Joe Thomas was a higher-level player at a more valuable position.

I appreciate Larry’s time here and he’s the main Cardinal most people will remember, but if anything he highlights that a great WR chosen with a high pick is still a dependent position if the franchise is going to go anywhere.
Yes and no. It seems like an offensive line can only get you so far. I get an argument that starts with, upgrading Humphries with Fashanu is not as impactful as upgrading Brown with MHJ. And we all pretty much agree that it isn't cost effective to use a 1st round pick on an interior OL player.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,389
Reaction score
29,775
Location
Gilbert, AZ
I get an argument that starts with, upgrading Humphries with Fashanu is not as impactful as upgrading Brown with MHJ
I get that argument also, but while drafting Fash forecloses the possibility of MHJ, there are a handful of better-than-Hollywood WRs in every draft and we could potentially get such a player with one of our other picks.

I don’t understand falling in love with individual prospects in general tho.
 

oaken1

Stone Cold
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
18,171
Reaction score
16,243
Location
Modesto, California
I get that argument also, but while drafting Fash forecloses the possibility of MHJ, there are a handful of better-than-Hollywood WRs in every draft and we could potentially get such a player with one of our other picks.

I don’t understand falling in love with individual prospects in general tho.
and drafting MHJ likely moves us away from getting an elite OT,...while grabbing Fash or Alt, still leaves us in position to get an elite WR prospect with either the Texans pick or pick 34.

Unless Amarius Mims is still available at the Texans pick
 

DVontel

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 28, 2015
Posts
13,017
Reaction score
23,172
Yes and no. It seems like an offensive line can only get you so far. I get an argument that starts with, upgrading Humphries with Fashanu is not as impactful as upgrading Brown with MHJ. And we all pretty much agree that it isn't cost effective to use a 1st round pick on an interior OL player.

I get that argument also, but while drafting Fash forecloses the possibility of MHJ, there are a handful of better-than-Hollywood WRs in every draft and we could potentially get such a player with one of our other picks.

I don’t understand falling in love with individual prospects in general tho.
This is what is tough.

On one hand, you need multiple high level weapons to consistently succeed in the league. That X-Factor with another very good weapon beside him to transform that offense. Even if MHJR isn’t there, I believe Nabers fits this bill as well.

On the other hand, I love the thought of having a dominant OLine. I love the thought of a Nick Bosa or TJ Watt making little to no impact because they’re getting locked down on both sides at EDGE. When you’re in the playoffs, you know you’re going against multiple great/elite EDGE players. Love the thought of a OLine just taking over the game.

It’s so tough. Glad I’m not the one making that decision.
 
OP
OP
football karma

football karma

Michael snuggles the cap space
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Posts
15,245
Reaction score
14,299
i love Fitz, but in the 2004 draft, the right pick should have been either Philip Rivers or Ben Roethlisberger (probably Rivers-- Big Ben and Old Town would have been a really bad mix)

but other than the two QBs -- Fitz was the best player left --
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,355
Reaction score
68,426
What we need is for Giants to suck enough to get the 3rd pick behind us at 2. So we can get another pick out of them and still take MHJ
Yup. Pull off the 1998 draft redux where we moved from 2 to 3 and picked up a number 1 for the next season and more.
 

SoonerLou

ASFN Addict
Joined
Sep 15, 2019
Posts
8,146
Reaction score
12,248
Location
St Louis, MO
This is what is tough.

On one hand, you need multiple high level weapons to consistently succeed in the league. That X-Factor with another very good weapon beside him to transform that offense. Even if MHJR isn’t there, I believe Nabers fits this bill as well.

On the other hand, I love the thought of having a dominant OLine. I love the thought of a Nick Bosa or TJ Watt making little to no impact because they’re getting locked down on both sides at EDGE. When you’re in the playoffs, you know you’re going against multiple great/elite EDGE players. Love the thought of a OLine just taking over the game.

It’s so tough. Glad I’m not the one making that decision.
So lets say you cant get MHJ. You end up drafting OLU at 5 (some QB will emerge and be overdrafted)

Would you trade up from the 20s to get to the early teens and draft Nabers?

I know we gotta lot of holes on the roster, but I'd move up to get two prime picks.

I guess I'd have to check to see what exactly did the Lions give up to get Jameson Williams.
Edit: Eh..
 
Last edited:

daves

Keepin' it real!
Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2003
Posts
3,526
Reaction score
7,207
Location
Orange County, CA
I appreciate Larry’s time here and he’s the main Cardinal most people will remember, but if anything he highlights that a great WR chosen with a high pick is still a dependent position if the franchise is going to go anywhere.
Indeed... a superstar WR may put up stats, but won't help a team to a Super Bowl trophy without a franchise QB and other supporting pieces.

But, the entire supposition behind taking MHJ is that the team is convinced that Murray is a franchise QB. If he's not, then the team won't be taking a WR or OL, they'll be taking a QB.

So now assuming Murray is the guy we all want him to be... taking MHJ and filling in the OL and D pieces later in the draft and via FA may be a viable strategy, no?
 

Cbus cardsfan

Back to Back ASFN FFL Champion
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
21,463
Reaction score
7,632
Why are people overthinking this?
Harrison is the best player in the draft. If you can take him, you take him.

The only way you don’t is if you get a blown away multi first round trade offer you can’t refuse.

Fashanu might not even be better than Alt. There’s no one in Harrison’s class at WR. Taking Fashanu over Harrison is taking Levi over AP part 2.
 

TheCardFan

Things have changed.
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
12,265
Reaction score
15,337
Location
Charlotte
So lets say you cant get MHJ. You end up drafting OLU at 5 (some QB will emerge and be overdrafted)

Would you trade up from the 20s to get to the early teens and draft Nabers?

For scenario below - let's say it would be too expensive to trade back up to get Nabers.

If we want to play around with the WR and OL combo in round 1.

Which scenario would you prefer at this point?

A) Take MHJ and either Mims, Latham, or Fuaga

B) Trade down a few spots (get 2025 #1 pick) take Olu or Alt and then take Franklin or Egbuka

C) Trade down a few spots (get 2025 #1 pick) take Nabers and either Mims, Latham, or Fuaga
 
Last edited:

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
39,739
Reaction score
23,887
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
Indeed... a superstar WR may put up stats, but won't help a team to a Super Bowl trophy without a franchise QB and other supporting pieces.

But, the entire supposition behind taking MHJ is that the team is convinced that Murray is a franchise QB. If he's not, then the team won't be taking a WR or OL, they'll be taking a QB.

So now assuming Murray is the guy we all want him to be... taking MHJ and filling in the OL and D pieces later in the draft and via FA may be a viable strategy, no?
Exactly. Thank you for nailing his attempt to move the goal posts.
 

TheCardFan

Things have changed.
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
12,265
Reaction score
15,337
Location
Charlotte
Trading down one spot with NE and then up to #10 with Giants.

You must be registered for see images attach
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
553,553
Posts
5,407,939
Members
6,317
Latest member
Denmark
Top