DVontel
ASFN Icon
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2015
- Posts
- 13,017
- Reaction score
- 23,172
Quinyon Mitchell seem like perfect Gannon/Rallis pick. Like how Garrett was.
That could be our 2nd round pick….
That could be our 2nd round pick….
we also have Higgy Bear...dude is developing nicely. Certainly not considering a first round pick on an H BackIs anyone considering Brock Bowers? We have a legitimate top end TE in McBride, maybe double down and make it an absolute strength position that could be a huge mismatch for most teams to try and cover. This would give Murray an extra security blanket to throw to and Bowers is a wrecking ball, the guy doesn’t go down first hit. We would instantly have a top tier TE duo in the league which to me would be worthy of having for the #4 pick.
I like Higgens, definitely a solid receiver, pretty good route runner. To me, Bowers is a difference maker. 4.5 speed and an absolute matchup nightmare for linebackers. The amount of strategizing defensive coordinators would have to go through trying to stop him, McBride and Connors would be fun to watch.we also have Higgy Bear...dude is developing nicely. Certainly not considering a first round pick on an H Back
Is anyone considering Brock Bowers? We have a legitimate top end TE in McBride, maybe double down and make it an absolute strength position that could be a huge mismatch for most teams to try and cover. This would give Murray an extra security blanket to throw to and Bowers is a wrecking ball, the guy doesn’t go down first hit. We would instantly have a top tier TE duo in the league which to me would be worthy of having for the #4 pick.
If he slides past 10 I’d be surprised. Tight ends tend to drop so it’s definitely possible as long as the Chargers pass on him at 5. If MHJ is gone and we can somehow trade the pick and grab him at the 8 spot I’d be thrilled. I really think this kid is generational.I love Brock but he’s not going top-10 and he’ll be gone by Houston’s pick. He doesn’t impact us.
If he slides past 10 I’d be surprised. Tight ends tend to drop so it’s definitely possible as long as the Chargers pass on him at 5. If MHJ is gone and we can somehow trade the pick and grab him at the 8 spot I’d be thrilled. I really think this kid is generational.
Not trade up, trade downThis is silly I’m as big a Brock honk there is. Monty isn’t trading up that high for anyone.
Quinyon Mitchell seem like perfect Gannon/Rallis pick. Like how Garrett was.
That could be our 2nd round pick….
Quinyon Mitchell seem like perfect Gannon/Rallis pick. Like how Garrett was.
That could be our 2nd round pick….
Seriously bad QBxc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
I know he’s got 4. He’d have 6-7 if he had better hands. He has 3 years with 1 or 0. I want a guy who produces almost every year.Jalen Thompson is tied for 7th in the NFL in interceptions.
I don’t think the offense is designed for 2 receiving TEs. Higgins has the potential to be adequate as a secondary target.Is anyone considering Brock Bowers? We have a legitimate top end TE in McBride, maybe double down and make it an absolute strength position that could be a huge mismatch for most teams to try and cover. This would give Murray an extra security blanket to throw to and Bowers is a wrecking ball, the guy doesn’t go down first hit. We would instantly have a top tier TE duo in the league which to me would be worthy of having for the #4 pick.
I would be curious to see what our offense could do with 13 personnel as our base.I don’t think the offense is designed for 2 receiving TEs. Higgins has the potential to be adequate as a secondary target.
I agree, lots of heavy packages we could run with athletic blocking tight ends who can also catch and Connor at back. Would give us a whole different look on offense at times. Would be very difficult for defenses to prepare for. Bowers is my pick if MHJ is gone.I would be curious to see what our offense could do with 13 personnel as our base.
Id take Nabers in a heartbeatI agree, lots of heavy packages we could run with athletic blocking tight ends who can also catch and Connor at back. Would give us a whole different look on offense at times. Would be very difficult for defenses to prepare for. Bowers is my pick if MHJ is gone.
Does Bowers block well?I agree, lots of heavy packages we could run with athletic blocking tight ends who can also catch and Connor at back. Would give us a whole different look on offense at times. Would be very difficult for defenses to prepare for. Bowers is my pick if MHJ is gone.
That’s cool but we need the threat of a big play, strike fast element to compliment that.I agree, lots of heavy packages we could run with athletic blocking tight ends who can also catch and Connor at back. Would give us a whole different look on offense at times. Would be very difficult for defenses to prepare for. Bowers is my pick if MHJ is gone.
He is a well regarded blocker, he’s not the biggest guy so maybe adding some weight will be needed at the next level. But he wS a big part of Georgia's run blocking and gets up the field quicklyDoes Bowers block well?
He’s a work in progress. He’s willing, athletic enough and strong enough. I think he develops into at least an adequate blocker.Does Bowers block well?
Definitely not at 4, but I would consider him in a trade down. I'm in the minority though.Is anyone considering Brock Bowers? We have a legitimate top end TE in McBride, maybe double down and make it an absolute strength position that could be a huge mismatch for most teams to try and cover. This would give Murray an extra security blanket to throw to and Bowers is a wrecking ball, the guy doesn’t go down first hit. We would instantly have a top tier TE duo in the league which to me would be worthy of having for the #4 pick.
When the Cardinals are this talent deficient...I think it matters less. Just looking at the contracts they have, there is a lot of flexibility moving forward. I agree there can be scenarios where positional allotments matter in terms of balancing the roster but I feel we aren't at that point.Yeah. I totally disagree with this. I think that paying two top-five contracts on the same offensive line or any position unit is an inefficient use of resources.
The reality is that you get three max contracts on offense and defense, maybe seven max contracts total (for a little while). Concentrating those resources at QB and both OT positions really stresses the ability of a front office to keep drafting strong role players across the rest of the offense.
I always think about how the Colts built their roster around Peyton Manning's max contract -- Marvin Harrison and then Reggie Wayne plus Tarik Glenn and then Jeff Saturday. Then they had to really save money on off-ball linebacker and cornerback (usually solving with scheme).
TBF...being on a better defense would help with that.I know he’s got 4. He’d have 6-7 if he had better hands. He has 3 years with 1 or 0. I want a guy who produces almost every year.
I dunno. I think when you're drafting very high you have to plan around that player signing a max contract in 3-5 years. It's different when you're outside the lottery and there's a less than 60% chance of your guy signing a second contract.When the Cardinals are this talent deficient...I think it matters less. Just looking at the contracts they have, there is a lot of flexibility moving forward. I agree there can be scenarios where positional allotments matter in terms of balancing the roster but I feel we aren't at that point.