The responsibility is on the person arguing that Trey Benson could be as good as arguably the greatest running back of all time to provide some evidence that is the case.
Straw man. No one asserted that.
@Harry said that he "
has the ability to be a
top starting RB when Conner is done, maybe sooner." Harry said he's an "Emmitt Smith
type player although
maybe not reaching those heights."
Regardless... my post didn't assert anything about Benson, I merely questioned your rebuttal of Harry's post by comparing Smith's rookie year stats when he was drafted to be a starting RB and wasn't challenged by anyone else on the roster, to Benson's stats working behind a guy who had better stats than Smith.
By the way, Smith achieved that whopping 59 yards per game by averaging 3.9 yards per carry, vs. Benson's 4.6 ypc (same as Conner's average). [Edit: Just saw that Harry and
@BritCard posted the same.]
Maybe we should start with the assertion that Trey Benson could still become the best running back in his draft class.
Bucky Irving started just three games for the Bucs last season and still managed to earn a lion's share of the carries over the course of the year.
[....]
Benson couldn't unseat Emari Demercado, my dude. Let's pump the brakes on the hype train.
Now THESE are valid rebuttals.
Guess we shall see!