Arians is the offensive Buddy Ryan

Cards_Campos

ASFN Addict
Joined
Nov 4, 2007
Posts
5,596
Reaction score
2,390
He brags and talks a big game. We looked better on offense...but he has completely neglected the defense. His friend cant scheme 4th grade pee wee defense. We had no pressure...whatsoever....think about if Honey Badger didn't mke a great play...they would have scored more. Just like Buddy Ryan Arians talked it up...and we fell for it. Our offense couldn't score 14 points under Ryan....and our defense was great. Now we can score 24+ but our defense looks horrible.

His cocky 3rd down and 2 call is a Buddy Ryan too....made no sense why to call it....If we make the first the game goes to OT at worse case.

Levi Has to be cut this week....I don't care if it cost 10 million to do it. Because Palmer will be Kevin Kolb in a few more games with him playing LT.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
88,550
Reaction score
40,360
That 3rd and 2 call was awful.

I loved that call it was wide open but as usual Levi got beat so Palmer had to rush the throw and didn't make a good throw. If he can hold that a bit longer it might have been a TD.
 

Bodha

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Posts
5,710
Reaction score
754
Offense looked great

D looked serviceable




If not for Levi and Arenas, we wouldve won. Simple as that
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
92,473
Reaction score
71,147
i've actually got no problem with that call...it was Palmer's AWFUL throw...which he had a lot of in the second half that was the problem.
 

Cbus cardsfan

Back to Back ASFN FFL Champion
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
21,614
Reaction score
7,986
I loved that call it was wide open but as usual Levi got beat so Palmer had to rush the throw and didn't make a good throw. If he can hold that a bit longer it might have been a TD.
exactly. Ellington was behind the defense but the timing was off.
 

HotSauce

Veteran
Joined
Apr 29, 2012
Posts
189
Reaction score
4
Will have to agree to disagree on that 3rd and 2.

That play wasn't nearly high percentage enough given the circumstances, IMO.
 

Bodha

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Posts
5,710
Reaction score
754
Great is probably a bit strong given they only scored 17 points.

compared to last year, this is the greatest show on turf p.2

dont rain on my parade
 

AzStevenCal

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Posts
36,966
Reaction score
16,844
and.....everyone else won...so we are really behind.

Yes but we're behind because we should be behind. We aren't very good and magical calls by the Head Coach aren't going to change that. I can't be the only one that thought we looked like the second best team out there today?

I expected the Cards to be horrible this year. Unless today was a fluke, we're merely bad not horrible and that might change when we get our best defensive player back on the field. It's going to take awhile to get enough talent in town to compete with the better teams in this league and losing our best defensive player and our number one pick is a tough way to start off for this new regime.

Steve
 

Darkside

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 27, 2010
Posts
8,107
Reaction score
191
Location
Tempe, AZ
i've actually got no problem with that call...it was Palmer's AWFUL throw...which he had a lot of in the second half that was the problem.

Palmer started to look skittish to me after Levi gave up his second strip-sack. This worries me almost as much as the defense, which I thought was awful.

I really didn't like the 3rd and 2 call though. Thought it was too aggressive at that time, given how much time was left in the game. It was open, but was high risk. If we just get a first down we go to OT worst case. But its a tough call, you're either aggressive or not, gotta take the good with the bad.



Sent from my DROID RAZR HD using Tapatalk 2
 

D-Dogg

A Whole New World
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2003
Posts
45,193
Reaction score
1,475
Location
In The End Zone
Palmer started to look skittish to me after Levi gave up his second strip-sack. This worries me almost as much as the defense, which I thought was awful.

I really didn't like the 3rd and 2 call though. Thought it was too aggressive at that time, given how much time was left in the game. It was open, but was high risk. If we just get a first down we go to OT worst case. But its a tough call, you're either aggressive or not, gotta take the good with the bad.



Sent from my DROID RAZR HD using Tapatalk 2

Agreed, I'm good with it. If it is properly blocked, it's likely 6 and our winning probability skyrockets. I love the go-for-it mentality. Going to be an entertaining season (finally).
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
92,473
Reaction score
71,147
Palmer started to look skittish to me after Levi gave up his second strip-sack. This worries me almost as much as the defense, which I thought was awful.

I really didn't like the 3rd and 2 call though. Thought it was too aggressive at that time, given how much time was left in the game. It was open, but was high risk. If we just get a first down we go to OT worst case. But its a tough call, you're either aggressive or not, gotta take the good with the bad.



Sent from my DROID RAZR HD using Tapatalk 2

he started to look skittish around the time he ALWAYS looks skittish...when the chips are down and the game is on the line.
 

AzStevenCal

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Posts
36,966
Reaction score
16,844
Palmer started to look skittish to me after Levi gave up his second strip-sack. This worries me almost as much as the defense, which I thought was awful.

I really didn't like the 3rd and 2 call though. Thought it was too aggressive at that time, given how much time was left in the game. It was open, but was high risk. If we just get a first down we go to OT worst case. But its a tough call, you're either aggressive or not, gotta take the good with the bad.

I know you're saying "worst case" but OT was something we desperately needed to avoid. I have no problem with the call especially since it only failed because of execution not design.

Steve
 

JeffGollin

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
20,472
Reaction score
3,056
Location
Holmdel, NJ
Seriously dude...
No, no, no and no.

If BA were "the offensive Buddy Ryan", we'd come out throwing long 80% of the time.

Late in the 4Q, they put a graphic on the screen that showed our ratio of running plays to passing plays pretty close to even, with a slight edge - like (53/47 - to passing plays.
 

LDL

Veteran
Joined
Jul 29, 2006
Posts
462
Reaction score
0
No, no, no and no.

If BA were "the offensive Buddy Ryan", we'd come out throwing long 80% of the time.

Late in the 4Q, they put a graphic on the screen that showed our ratio of running plays to passing plays pretty close to even, with a slight edge - like (53/47 - to passing plays.

My apologies for not having the sarcasm emote in there. Cuz the OP is utter garbage.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
88,550
Reaction score
40,360
Will have to agree to disagree on that 3rd and 2.

That play wasn't nearly high percentage enough given the circumstances, IMO.

But that's why we hired Bruce Arians in the first place. He doesn't coach by percentages, he goes for the kill. Palmer made a bad throw in part due to Levi not giving him enough time. If the players execute there it's a brilliant call.

I never fault the coach when the play is actually open and you just miss it.

Palmer wasn't as good in the 2nd half I suspect in part because he knew he couldn't trust Levi to protect him.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
88,550
Reaction score
40,360
I know you're saying "worst case" but OT was something we desperately needed to avoid. I have no problem with the call especially since it only failed because of execution not design.

Steve

I also think there's an element of Arians doesn't trust his kicker and doesn't trust his defense so he thinks he HAS to go for the big play there?

They were going to have too long if we go for a safe play and it doesn't work. If you go to OT the team with the better K has a huge advantage and that's clearly them.

Also don't overlook what a huge play that was by Austin to block Tyrann away before he could down the punt around the 2 yard line.
 

AzStevenCal

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Posts
36,966
Reaction score
16,844
I also think there's an element of Arians doesn't trust his kicker and doesn't trust his defense so he thinks he HAS to go for the big play there?

They were going to have too long if we go for a safe play and it doesn't work. If you go to OT the team with the better K has a huge advantage and that's clearly them.

Also don't overlook what a huge play that was by Austin to block Tyrann away before he could down the punt around the 2 yard line.

Yeah, that was a huge block. As I said, I have no problem with the play call. The Rams had momentum, home field and kicker advantage and that doesn't bode well for OT.

Steve
 
OP
OP
C

Cards_Campos

ASFN Addict
Joined
Nov 4, 2007
Posts
5,596
Reaction score
2,390
My apologies for not having the sarcasm emote in there. Cuz the OP is utter garbage.

Dude who made you Jesus. It is my opinion. Calling me garbage should get you banned. Sorry I didn't read your book on being awesome.

I cant wait to read your insight on how to improve us...I will get out my crayons to enjoy that.

secondly...my thread isn't based on us throwing 80 times....it is the fact he thinks the offense is the only thing important. The play call was arrogant at the time. We had nothing to gain even if we scored on it...because I see the Rams scoring too because they would have had tons of time. We needed to march down and kick a 30 yard fg with not time left.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
558,105
Posts
5,452,563
Members
6,336
Latest member
FKUCZK15
Top