Arizona Cardinals' Offense: 2010 Preview

Mitch

Crawled Through 5 FB Fields
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Posts
13,405
Reaction score
2,982
Location
Wrentham, MA
Improvements on Offense:

1. Continued growth in the running game that will make play action passes all the more dynamic and successful. The Cardinals boast a prolific young trio of RBs in Tim Hightower, Beanie Wells and LaRod Stephens-Howling, and a solid run blocking unit up front.

2. Stronger edge pass protection.

3. Making the vertical passing game stronger. Improving the edge protection is critical for this to happen.

4. Integrating well timed and executed screen passes into the game plans.

Personnel Needs:

1. LT. This is obviously a critical spot to solidify. I think it would be very interesting to see what Levi Brown looks like on the left side---his natural side. Mike Gandy and/or Jeremy Bridges could likely be re-signed for a little above the veteran minimum, but, at this point, both Gandy and Bridges are ideal for depth, but not as full-time starters. What may facilitate the move of Brown to LT is the emergence of Herman Johnson or Brandon Keith at RT. Both are big and athletic prospects, but neither would seem to be a fit on the left side. Perhaps the Cardinals could make an offer to one of Tampa Bay's two restricted free agent tackles, Jeremy Trueblood or Donald Penn. Tampa would have the right to match, but, hey, they might decide they can part with one of them. If not, expect the Cardinals to draft a tackle in the first three rounds, possibly even in round one.

2. Speed WR. This would be a luxury for sure, but a sure way to improve the vertical passing game. I think it's more than likely that the Cardinals will trade Anquan Boldin this off-season. Last year the only legitimate offer they received was the #49 from the Bears, which could have allowed the Cardinals to select S Sherrod Martin, T Phil Loadholt, T Sebastian Vollmer, T Will Beatty, RB Shonn Green, DE/OLB Paul Kruger or DE/OLB David Veikune. The Cardinals balked at the #49 pick last year, but this year I think they would take it, especially if a tackle in the mold of Loadholt, Vollmer or Beatty is on the board---or if one of the best LBers is still available---and this draft is loaded with very good LB prospects (more on that in the defense post to follow).

3. FB. Not sure if Dan Kreider will be re-signed or if the team likes what they see in Nehemiah Broughton or the injured Justin Green. It wouldn't surprise me if the Cardinals went after a combo FB/TE type in order to save a roster spot. Don't be surprised if Ben Patrick and Stephen Spach get some looks there from time to time. Patrick was mauling people as a motion lead blocker toward the end of the season.

4. QB (this jumps to #1 if Warner retires). If we see the Cardinals making moves to address the needs at T, ILB, and OLB prior to the draft, I strongly believe that they will be drafting a QB with one of their first three picks. There's simply too much uncertainty with Matt Leinart as he heads toward a $14M payday in 2011. If Warner does retires, the one restricted free agent to keep an eye on is Tarvaris Jackson of Minnesota. Were the Cardinals to offer Jackson a contract in the $3.5-4M range (plus incentives), the Vikings may be loathe to match it. Jackson will garner interest elsewhere, but, let's face it, right now any free agent QB would be drooling over the prospects of playing for the Cardinals. A cheaper option might be restricted free agent Brodie Croyle---a player that Whiz could possibly do wonders for. Brian St. Pierre might accept a similar deal as last year's to return to be in the mix, and he is a valuable scout team QB and mind in the sideline huddles, but did very little this pre-season to show that he could be a legitimate option to start if needed to.

Offensive Players to Re-Sign (the range of what I would offer---if they agree, fine, if not, sign them to one year deals where they would be paid far less for now).

1. RG Deuce Lutui (3 yrs/$8.5M).
2. C Lyle Sendlein (3 yrs/$6M)
3. WR Steve Breaston (4 yrs./$14M)
4. TE Anthony Becht (1 yr./$1M)
5. TE Ben Patrick (3 yrs./$6M)
6. T/G Jeremy Bridges (1 yr./$850K)

The two players on this list who could command RFA offers are Breaston and Lutui. Some team might make a lucrative offer to Breaston, probably in the 4/$14M range I listed above---which I would expect the Cardinals to match. I can't imagine Lutui being offered more than $3M per, so again, I think the Cardinals could match an offer for him. He really had a solid year---his best by far. I know the Cardinals like Brandon Keith, but he might be more in the tackle mix this year.

2010 Projection:

Kurt Warner's return is critical to the morale and confidence of this high flying offense. Warner has said that a player shouldn't "retire too soon" and when you look at his performances this year, the vast majority of them were masterful. It would have been another thing if his play had faltered at any point. It didn't. In fact, he was more confuident and decisive as he's ever been. The opponents were raving at how quickly and accurately his passes were coming out this year. In the past, the hope was he would hold the ball too long, but Warner is so fluent in this offense and so on track with his receivers and the timing of the offense that he knows exactly where to look and when to snap off his release. When you look back at the variety of passes he threw in the Green Bay game and how much zip or touch he put on the ball, it was a sheer thing of beauty. I still have visions of the sideline fade pass he threw Steve Breaston where Warner released the ball at the perfect moment and arced it beautifully up the right side over the DBs shoulder and into Breaston's arms as Breaston never had to break stride. I believe that Warner himself relishes the sheer art of his craft and hey, when you are painting Rembrandts and there's still plenty of paint, you keep on painting them.

One has to love the skill players in this offense...even without Anquan Boldin. Larry Fitzgerald will come back faster and more determined than ever this year. Steve Breaston and Early Doucet will make strong attempts to surpass the 1,000 yard milestone, as will RBs Tim Hightower and Beanie Wells. Imagine how much stronger, swfiter and more confident RB LaRon Stephens-Howling will be. And this could be the real breakout season for Ben Patrick as an all-purpose TE and downfield receiving threat.

Imagine too a stronger line next season, particularly on the edges. The interior three of Wells, Sendlein and Lutui were remarkably consistent this season and are stepping up in unison. Levi Brown, despite his occasional mistakes, improved steadily throughout the season and at times is an absolute mauler in the running game---one of the reasons why this Cardinal offense has begun to thrive in all aspects.

Add to this group a solid tackle and a deep threat (boy, the Steelers really cashed in in the 5th round last year with Mike Wallace, imagine if the Cardinals do the same)...and we could be watching the most talented, explosive and dynamic Cardinal offense ever.

As for Ken Whisenhunt calling the plays, I think it's great and I do not see this hampering his ability to coach the entire team. In fact, because Whiz is calling the plays, he's even more invested in the games and their outcomes. The thing is: Whiz is an excellent play caller, and honestly, with his penchant for running a rushing attack, combined with his intricate knowledge of the passing game, and the exemplary way in which he caters to the stengths of his personnel and involves everyone into the schemes, he's a better fit for this team than Haley was. We've got the right guy making the calls.
 
Last edited:

seesred

Registered User
Joined
Jul 15, 2002
Posts
5,364
Reaction score
28
Location
section 8 row 10
I think you are correct in your thinking out the offensive needs. Especially on the left side of the line. I hope we find room for Q, that being said he most likely will be saying good bye. Scoring points we will be chasing the Saints and we can catch them. I think Warner is gone. Especially after the hit he took this past week. The question of how do we pick up a QB, draft or FA? Big question mark on Matt. Maybe with a full camp and a good pre season most of us will settle down. That is of cource assuming he makes first string.

Our most important job in the off season is what to do about our defense? Who replaces Dansby or Rolle or our corners with DRC a question mark? Darnel needs a deal that might set up the dominoes. Get him done. Of course you could say we had so many injuries that last sad game. Calais, DRC,Rolle etc. But our back ups are just not getting the job done. Adams,Brown, and others have trouble competing because if size. In this league size counts!

Our special teams for the most part were playing well during the season. Rackers was hurt and hopefully he will be back as strong as ever. Graham was amazing till the last game.

As for Our wonderfull Whiz of Cards sign him and don't let him hanging while the two Bidwills decide what they are going to pay him. He is in the top 5 coaches in the NFL in my opinion. And should be paid like he is. What he has done in just 3 years to a team that appeared ready to fold it's tent was remarkable. Can't wait till next year. I want top be alive for our super bowl win!

GBR
40
 
Joined
Nov 15, 2002
Posts
13,305
Reaction score
1,185
Location
SE Valley
Very solid appraisal, Mitch. I don't share your optimism of Tavaris Jackson's skills however. There's a reason Minnesota coveted Farve for several years...
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
89,184
Reaction score
41,128
One comment I'm curious what you think Mitch.

Why would the Cards take a QB in round one this year if Kurt retires? If Matt isn't the guy as many people seem to think, doesn't it follow that taking a QB NEXT year makes more sense?

This year we have the 26th pick, so we're either hoping for luck where an Aaron Rodgers falls to 26(unlikely), or we're taking a QB who's probably not all that great.

But if Matt's as bad as some seem to think wouldn't it follow logically that NEXT season's pick would be much higher giving us a better chance at getting a franchise QB?

To move up this year we'd have to package Boldin and the pick for a QB and given the defensive needs that wouldn't make much sense to me?
 

MrYeahBut

4 Food groups: beans, chili, cheese, bacon
Supporting Member
Joined
May 20, 2002
Posts
17,998
Reaction score
13,870
Location
Albq
Mitch, I did mention this in another thread but in a different context. I had the good fortune to be in line at the New Orleans airport with Bridges wife the morning after the game. Amoung other things she said, was a comment about how good he will look on tape for any upcoming contract talks. I got the feeling she somehow saw $ signs because of his recent play. Just her opinion, of course. (In case you didn't see my other comments, she basically said not even the players wives could believe how poorly the D played in the Saints game)
 
OP
OP
Mitch

Mitch

Crawled Through 5 FB Fields
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Posts
13,405
Reaction score
2,982
Location
Wrentham, MA
One comment I'm curious what you think Mitch.

Why would the Cards take a QB in round one this year if Kurt retires? If Matt isn't the guy as many people seem to think, doesn't it follow that taking a QB NEXT year makes more sense?

This year we have the 26th pick, so we're either hoping for luck where an Aaron Rodgers falls to 26(unlikely), or we're taking a QB who's probably not all that great.

But if Matt's as bad as some seem to think wouldn't it follow logically that NEXT season's pick would be much higher giving us a better chance at getting a franchise QB?

To move up this year we'd have to package Boldin and the pick for a QB and given the defensive needs that wouldn't make much sense to me?

Russ, I think that if Whiz really likes a QB in this draft he'd rather take him and start grooming him now. That way he might be able to contend for a starting job in 2011, better than a rookie straight out of the draft.

How do you feel about Tim Tebow? For some reason, I think Whiz might be very high on this kid despite the scrutiny over his delivery (which Whiz may feel he can help Tebow correct or modify). I say this because of Tebow's intangibles as a leader and competitor. His toughness is a real asset as well. Were Tebow to be available at #26...which, IMO, is unlikely, because I think that he's more highly regarded than first thought...it wouldn't surprise me if Whiz selected him. Big, strong, tough QBs are intriguing, especially ones who have thrived at the top of the collegiate ranks.
 
OP
OP
Mitch

Mitch

Crawled Through 5 FB Fields
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Posts
13,405
Reaction score
2,982
Location
Wrentham, MA
Mitch, I did mention this in another thread but in a different context. I had the good fortune to be in line at the New Orleans airport with Bridges wife the morning after the game. Amoung other things she said, was a comment about how good he will look on tape for any upcoming contract talks. I got the feeling she somehow saw $ signs because of his recent play. Just her opinion, of course. (In case you didn't see my other comments, she basically said not even the players wives could believe how poorly the D played in the Saints game)

Thanks, MrYeahbut. I don't think Bridges' recent play is going to provide him with a more lucrative contract. I think he will command slightly above the veteran minimum, that's all. His versatility as a backup is attractive.
 

Buckybird

Hoist the Lombardi Trophy
Joined
Nov 11, 2002
Posts
25,310
Reaction score
6,340
Location
Dallas, TX
If we draft a QB, Levi Brown from Troy may be available in Rd 3. I luv this kid & think he a gunslinger similar to Favre.
 

joeshmo

Kangol Hat Aficionado
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Posts
17,247
Reaction score
1
How do you feel about Tim Tebow? For some reason, I think Whiz might be very high on this kid despite the scrutiny over his delivery (which Whiz may feel he can help Tebow correct or modify). I say this because of Tebow's intangibles as a leader and competitor. His toughness is a real asset as well. Were Tebow to be available at #26...which, IMO, is unlikely, because I think that he's more highly regarded than first thought...it wouldn't surprise me if Whiz selected him. Big, strong, tough QBs are intriguing, especially ones who have thrived at the top of the collegiate ranks.

I like Tebow way more then most myself. He is the hardest working kid in college football. He wants to be great and he will work his tail off to do it. Meaning the issues he does have, playing under center and mechanics are very workable.

But I would only draft him if Warner is still here in 2010. I say this because we know how big of a christian that Kurt is, well Tebow is just as big. I think these two personalities and beliefs would make them fast friends and Tebow would follow around Warner like a puppy dog, Tebow would emulate everything Warner does in terms of work, study, how to lead, and so on.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
89,184
Reaction score
41,128
Russ, I think that if Whiz really likes a QB in this draft he'd rather take him and start grooming him now. That way he might be able to contend for a starting job in 2011, better than a rookie straight out of the draft.

How do you feel about Tim Tebow? For some reason, I think Whiz might be very high on this kid despite the scrutiny over his delivery (which Whiz may feel he can help Tebow correct or modify). I say this because of Tebow's intangibles as a leader and competitor. His toughness is a real asset as well. Were Tebow to be available at #26...which, IMO, is unlikely, because I think that he's more highly regarded than first thought...it wouldn't surprise me if Whiz selected him. Big, strong, tough QBs are intriguing, especially ones who have thrived at the top of the collegiate ranks.


No idea beyond if Whiz drove Matt nuts with his stressing of fundamentals he'll drive Tebow nuts too. Tebow is really bad mechanically, he's a great athlete and gets by on that but he really has no idea how to play a pro style QB. His throwing mechanics are bad, he's always looking to run. He may eventually be good who knows but I can't see Whiz using a #1 pick on a guy that raw.
 

PJ1

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 21, 2002
Posts
12,370
Reaction score
5,572
Location
Nashville TN.
No idea beyond if Whiz drove Matt nuts with his stressing of fundamentals he'll drive Tebow nuts too. Tebow is really bad mechanically, he's a great athlete and gets by on that but he really has no idea how to play a pro style QB. His throwing mechanics are bad, he's always looking to run. He may eventually be good who knows but I can't see Whiz using a #1 pick on a guy that raw.

Would never happen. We aren't drafting him at all in my opinion. In the first round would be crazy.
 

LarryStalling

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 18, 2006
Posts
1,144
Reaction score
112
Mitch, I truly hope that the Cards can coach up Sendlien not to give the snap count away. He cost us the last San Fran game and I think the Saints were keying on him in last weekends game as well. He certainly was giving away the snap count. If they can't coach him out of it, then we need a new center. He can not consistently revert back to his old way. What I do wonder is why he tends to do it more against a 4 3 than a 34 defense. He did not do it in either game against Green Bay. You simply can not give defenses that much of an advantage.
 

187

BIRDGANG
Joined
Apr 29, 2009
Posts
2,020
Reaction score
63
Location
Glendale, AZ
Russ, I think that if Whiz really likes a QB in this draft he'd rather take him and start grooming him now. That way he might be able to contend for a starting job in 2011, better than a rookie straight out of the draft.

How do you feel about Tim Tebow? For some reason, I think Whiz might be very high on this kid despite the scrutiny over his delivery (which Whiz may feel he can help Tebow correct or modify). I say this because of Tebow's intangibles as a leader and competitor. His toughness is a real asset as well. Were Tebow to be available at #26...which, IMO, is unlikely, because I think that he's more highly regarded than first thought...it wouldn't surprise me if Whiz selected him. Big, strong, tough QBs are intriguing, especially ones who have thrived at the top of the collegiate ranks.

If we draft Tebow with our 1st rounder I will be livid. And seeing how much Whiz wants his QB's to be fundamentally sound, Tebow is hopefully nowhere near his radar.
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
560,658
Posts
5,473,830
Members
6,337
Latest member
61_Shasta
Top