Bears Current Posture

Solar7

Go Suns
Joined
May 18, 2002
Posts
11,172
Reaction score
12,108
Location
Las Vegas, NV
Clown take. Fields is a wreck.
Calling him a wreck is a little overzealous, but I don't really know that he's a consistently winning QB you can rely on... and maybe that's just the environment of Chicago. Maybe he'd succeed in a dome or fair weather environment more often?

I'm not convinced he's anywhere near a franchise guy though. We've had enough years to see it. The weapons at hand don't appear to be the problem, the problem appears to be his inaccuracy.
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,490
Reaction score
34,464
Location
Charlotte, NC
Calling him a wreck is a little overzealous, but I don't really know that he's a consistently winning QB you can rely on... and maybe that's just the environment of Chicago. Maybe he'd succeed in a dome or fair weather environment more often?

I'm not convinced he's anywhere near a franchise guy though. We've had enough years to see it. The weapons at hand don't appear to be the problem, the problem appears to be his inaccuracy.
Even within games, he can be so inconsistent. Very hard to build an offense around a QB like that. Comparing him to Lamar Jackson is next level hilarious.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,283
Reaction score
40,297
Location
Colorado
I'm wholeheartedly worried that we end up in one of two godawful positions:

1. Chicago takes MHJ, Williams and Maye go, we can't legitimately go for drafting Daniels (or whoever ends up at QB3) over Kyler, and so just... make some blah trade back, or take an OT and functionally run the same offense out there next year.
2. Chicago ends up trading back 1-2 spots, getting a haul, and still taking MHJ before us. And we make some blah trade back or take an OT and functionally run the same offense out there next year.

I'm not feeling good that three QBs are going in the top three. And yes, I know Nabers is very good and could be great, anyone can be great, and draft position apparently no longer matters... but come on. I'm also not looking forward to yet another WR who is shorter than I am.

I know there's a lot to sort out. But this is a very bad team, and I don't really see the solution as getting an OT and like, Rome Odunze, hoping and praying he's the Justin Jefferson of this class and not Treylon Burks.
The MHJ going #1 delusions are driving me crazy. If you really feel that way, go lay 20:1 odds at a sportsbook and potentially get rich.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,389
Reaction score
29,775
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Clown take. Fields is a wreck.

Kevin Clark was addressing Fields this morning on the Football Today podcast (which is excellent, IMO). He said that Justin Fields is never going to be a top 5 QB, and we got spoiled watching a class of QBs in Lamar, Mahomes, Burrow, and Herbert mature so fast that if your guy wasn't the guy in three years, you dumped them in the garbage can.

It was deranged that Paul Calvisi had Kyler on MVP Watch in his second season.

Justin Fields can consistently be a Top 12-ish QB and keep you in games with a chance for the defense to win it. He was 12th in DYAR last week. Gannon is actively trying to turn Kyler Murray into this type of player right now, and a lot of people here can't be more excited about it.

Have a good friend who is a die hard bears fan. There is a significant majority of them that think they are MHJ + an Oline player away from being a playoff team.

They might be! The NFC sucks! Being a playoff team is a good thing, also. But I don't know if that gets them into championship contention in the next two or three years.

It'll be really interesting to see how this year's playoffs turn out. You have two pretty clear classes of QBs: golden-boy signal callers (Mahomes, Allen, Lamar, Lawrence, Dak, Hurts, Stafford) and a group of more working-class operators (Purdy, Love, Goff, Baker, Minshew, Stroud, Tua). How will it shake out?
 

vince56

ASFN Addict
Joined
Sep 15, 2002
Posts
9,081
Reaction score
2,304
Location
Arizona
The absolute best thing the Bears could do is invest in their future by trading down with a QB-needy team and stockpiling draft picks.

But this is the Bears and they will do the opposite of what would make them successful. Did you see Fields’ post-game interview the other day, where he was lamenting about it being his last home game in Soldier Field? He’s as gone as gone could be. They are going to trade him and draft Caleb Williams.

Totally the wrong move IMO as they are way more than a QB away, but it’s the Bears and they haven’t been successful but twice in 50 years, so you have to first think about the best move, and then realize they will do the opposite.
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,490
Reaction score
34,464
Location
Charlotte, NC
Kevin Clark was addressing Fields this morning on the Football Today podcast (which is excellent, IMO). He said that Justin Fields is never going to be a top 5 QB, and we got spoiled watching a class of QBs in Lamar, Mahomes, Burrow, and Herbert mature so fast that if your guy wasn't the guy in three years, you dumped them in the garbage can.

It was deranged that Paul Calvisi had Kyler on MVP Watch in his second season.

Justin Fields can consistently be a Top 12-ish QB and keep you in games with a chance for the defense to win it. He was 12th in DYAR last week. Gannon is actively trying to turn Kyler Murray into this type of player right now, and a lot of people here can't be more excited about it.
I have to see more than just a stretch of this. There is a much longer stretch of Fields being a well below replacement passer.

Like I said in another thread, getting excited about a stretch where a QB posts a 1:1 TD to TO ratio shows just how bad Fields has been. It's hard for a team to be consistently competitive with a QB who turns the ball over every single game, doesn't produce a ton of passing yards, and doesn't produce a lot of TDs.
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,490
Reaction score
34,464
Location
Charlotte, NC
The absolute best thing the Bears could do is invest in their future by trading down with a QB-needy team and stockpiling draft picks.

But this is the Bears and they will do the opposite of what would make them successful. Did you see Fields’ post-game interview the other day, where he was lamenting about it being his last home game in Soldier Field? He’s as gone as gone could be. They are going to trade him and draft Caleb Williams.

Totally the wrong move IMO as they are way more than a QB away, but it’s the Bears and they haven’t been successful but twice in 50 years, so you have to first think about the best move, and then realize they will do the opposite.
If you put a better QB on the Bears right now, they might be a playoff team. But it's a gamble that Williams/Maye will better as well.
 

BullheadCardFan

Go for it
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2005
Posts
63,126
Reaction score
28,349
Location
Bullhead City, AZ
It'll be really interesting to see how this year's playoffs turn out. You have two pretty clear classes of QBs: golden-boy signal callers (Mahomes, Allen, Lamar, Lawrence, Dak, Hurts, Stafford) and a group of more working-class operators (Purdy, Love, Goff, Baker, Minshew, Stroud, Tua). How will it shake out?
I'm curious to see how it turns out also
 

BullheadCardFan

Go for it
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2005
Posts
63,126
Reaction score
28,349
Location
Bullhead City, AZ
If you put a better QB on the Bears right now, they might be a playoff team. But it's a gamble that Williams/Maye will better as well.
This

The coaching staff has really see something special in one of these guys to develop to make the move off Fields
 

Cbus cardsfan

Back to Back ASFN FFL Champion
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
21,463
Reaction score
7,632
Wasn't Jalen Hurst considered an inaccurate passer who could run? I think Fields is a better passer than Hurst. Hurst has been given loads of weapons and has made the most of it. I don't see any reason Fields can't be the same with a WR corps of Moore, Harrison, Kmet, and Claypool. Add some OL pieces and the Bears should be challenging the Lions the next few years for the division.
 

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
22,461
Reaction score
40,976
Location
UK
Talk on the street is the Bears will trade the first pick and go with Fields unless the Green Bay game changes their mind. They will get a huge return. I think it’s better than even money the first 3 picks go QB. If they do the Cards will still face a tough decision. I favor taking Harrison. They will not get a windfall if they trade down.

This was always the obvious choice. Fields has vastly improved and the haul on offer is too great.
 

QuebecCard

ASFN Addict
Joined
Mar 12, 2021
Posts
5,877
Reaction score
8,307
Location
North of the 49th.
Wasn't Jalen Hurst considered an inaccurate passer who could run? I think Fields is a better passer than Hurst. Hurst has been given loads of weapons and has made the most of it. I don't see any reason Fields can't be the same with a WR corps of Moore, Harrison, Kmet, and Claypool. Add some OL pieces and the Bears should be challenging the Lions the next few years for the division.

And they can pick a QB at #1, trade Fields, add a key piece with their 2nd first-round top 10 pick (Nabers, Odunze ?), etc., etc. and have QB financial certainty for five seasons.

I know what I'd do.
 

Totally_Red

Air Raid Warning!
Joined
Apr 26, 2005
Posts
8,888
Reaction score
4,817
Location
Iowa
If Williams wasn't available then the Bears decision would be easy just like last year.

Passing on Williams would be something like passing on Patrick Mahomes for Mitchell Trubisky IMO.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,389
Reaction score
29,775
Location
Gilbert, AZ
If Williams wasn't available then the Bears decision would be easy just like last year.

Passing on Williams would be something like passing on Patrick Mahomes for Mitchell Trubisky IMO.
Mahomes and Trubisky were in the same draft class. That was just bad evaluation, IMO.

Passing on Williams for Fields could be like passing on Mahomes to take Jamal Adams when you got Josh McCown.
 
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Posts
10,445
Reaction score
7,401
Location
Chandler
Wasn't Jalen Hurst considered an inaccurate passer who could run? I think Fields is a better passer than Hurst. Hurst has been given loads of weapons and has made the most of it. I don't see any reason Fields can't be the same with a WR corps of Moore, Harrison, Kmet, and Claypool. Add some OL pieces and the Bears should be challenging the Lions the next few years for the division.
Claypool is no longer on the team.
 

Solar7

Go Suns
Joined
May 18, 2002
Posts
11,172
Reaction score
12,108
Location
Las Vegas, NV
The MHJ going #1 delusions are driving me crazy. If you really feel that way, go lay 20:1 odds at a sportsbook and potentially get rich.
That's why I put in two options.

It's not at all a weird thought to see the Bears move back one or two spots and still get him. I don't know if conceptually

What I don't see the Bears doing is moving behind us to another team. So the hope (for me at least, who wants MHJ desperately), is that they stick in place and take a QB.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PJ1

JosiahLee

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Posts
2,140
Reaction score
4,028
Location
Gilbert
There is still a decent chance the Patriots beat the Jets Sunday and we move up to #3.

That should improve the chances of getting MHJ if Monti doesn't blow it.
I feel like everyone is discounting a Cards win in the finale against Seattle, which I think is a real possibility.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
553,547
Posts
5,407,929
Members
6,317
Latest member
Denmark
Top