Speaking of which Comcast just informed me that NFL Net is now available in my little pocket of Cupertino, of course it's an extra cost to add a sports tier
package, but when I first switched over to digital cable I couldn't get it at all.
Now if I can just get them to add FSN Pacific to that same sports tier instead of a separate one(so I can get UCLA hoops games) I will be happy.
Continues to amaze me that the NFL does this stuff in this way. I've never got the letting Directv have exclusive rights to Sunday ticket when they'd have so many more subscribers if they had it on Cable too. I gotta believe the NFL could make MORE money but not doing it exclusively.
Probably not. The subsidy that directv is and has been paying probably eclipses the revenue from total subscibers combined. What is more baffling is why people still choose cable tv over Directv.
Because when you live in an apartment, you don't want to sign an contract, or have to pay for an insurance policy for your freaking satellite dish.
Funny thing is that back when I used to live in apartments, I actually did base where I lived on Directv. In my opinion, it is that much better.Correct, mine requires a large deposit, even if the install is completely without making any penetrations (using a dish stand and running the wire through an open door.) I'm sure it's probably illegal but since we knew we wouldn't stay for too long I never even considered challenging it.
I'd love to have Directv but I'm not going to make a decision on where to live based on whether or not I can get directv, at least not as long as my girlfriend has a say in it.
I just find it hard to believe that Directv is paying so much that the NFL can't get more by simply selling them both access. I see why Directv wants exclusivity it's a huge selling point for them, but I don't see why the NFL does.
Probably not. The subsidy that directv is and has been paying probably eclipses the revenue from total subscibers combined. What is more baffling is why people still choose cable tv over Directv.
Show me the cost benefit of switching from Cox (expanded digital with DVR, HD and the sports tier) to a comparable one-room package with DirecTV. It doesnt add up.
I have all that and it adds up to about $70 a month which was less, so it does add up. Either way, the quality is better. Channel 0-100 on Cox looks like TV from the 1970s, but to each his own.
Direct TV is only in business because they have NFL Sunday Ticket. The rest of their features dont even come close to what cable offers. i will say that i am pissed that NFL Net. was free last year and now I have to pay for it.
But you forgot the cost of the HD/DVR receiver, which last I looked was $300.
I have two which were $0 each. Of course they will ask for the $300, but if you tell them "DisH Network and cable will give it to me for free" they will be at your house that weekend with your whole set up, for free. They buckle like Mark Bulger under pressure.
Plus, I looked at Direct TVs actual HD offering and it was paltry...they don't seem to offer as much as they claim.
They are saying 100 HD channels by the end of the year.
http://www.directv.com/DTVAPP/global/contentPageNR.jsp?assetId=P4360042&CMP=ILC-Q407-RHR-100HD
gimmick. 100 channels includes local channels from major markets.
Thats like including ABC in Los Angeles, New York, and Boston, and counting that as 3 new channels.
Yeah but then my Internets and Phone would go through the roof because I no longer would get the bundle discount.
Plus, I looked at Direct TVs actual HD offering and it was paltry...they don't seem to offer as much as they claim.
They are saying 100 HD channels by the end of the year.
http://www.directv.com/DTVAPP/global/contentPageNR.jsp?assetId=P4360042&CMP=ILC-Q407-RHR-100HD
gimmick. 100 channels includes local channels from major markets.
Thats like including ABC in Los Angeles, New York, and Boston, and counting that as 3 new channels.