Blow the whistle on cable companies

Mulli

...
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2004
Posts
52,529
Reaction score
4,603
Location
Generational
I hate my cable company, but I get NFL Network. I could do without the films reliving the 49er dynasty.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
88,186
Reaction score
39,791
Speaking of which Comcast just informed me that NFL Net is now available in my little pocket of Cupertino, of course it's an extra cost to add a sports tier
package, but when I first switched over to digital cable I couldn't get it at all.

Now if I can just get them to add FSN Pacific to that same sports tier instead of a separate one(so I can get UCLA hoops games) I will be happy.

Continues to amaze me that the NFL does this stuff in this way. I've never got the letting Directv have exclusive rights to Sunday ticket when they'd have so many more subscribers if they had it on Cable too. I gotta believe the NFL could make MORE money but not doing it exclusively.
 

RonF

Per Ardua Ad Astra
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
2,090
Reaction score
4
Location
Sun City, AZ
Directv has many of their popular channels go HD, starting today, and it includes the NFL Channel. There are more channels scheduled to switch over to HD in October.
 

azsouthendzone

ASFN Addict
Joined
Feb 10, 2004
Posts
5,620
Reaction score
1,322
Speaking of which Comcast just informed me that NFL Net is now available in my little pocket of Cupertino, of course it's an extra cost to add a sports tier
package, but when I first switched over to digital cable I couldn't get it at all.

Now if I can just get them to add FSN Pacific to that same sports tier instead of a separate one(so I can get UCLA hoops games) I will be happy.

Continues to amaze me that the NFL does this stuff in this way. I've never got the letting Directv have exclusive rights to Sunday ticket when they'd have so many more subscribers if they had it on Cable too. I gotta believe the NFL could make MORE money but not doing it exclusively.

Probably not. The subsidy that directv is and has been paying probably eclipses the revenue from total subscibers combined. What is more baffling is why people still choose cable tv over Directv.
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,291
Reaction score
11,925
Probably not. The subsidy that directv is and has been paying probably eclipses the revenue from total subscibers combined. What is more baffling is why people still choose cable tv over Directv.

Because when you live in an apartment, you don't want to sign an contract, or have to pay for an insurance policy for your freaking satellite dish.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
88,186
Reaction score
39,791
Because when you live in an apartment, you don't want to sign an contract, or have to pay for an insurance policy for your freaking satellite dish.

Correct, mine requires a large deposit, even if the install is completely without making any penetrations (using a dish stand and running the wire through an open door.) I'm sure it's probably illegal but since we knew we wouldn't stay for too long I never even considered challenging it.

I'd love to have Directv but I'm not going to make a decision on where to live based on whether or not I can get directv, at least not as long as my girlfriend has a say in it.

:D

I just find it hard to believe that Directv is paying so much that the NFL can't get more by simply selling them both access. I see why Directv wants exclusivity it's a huge selling point for them, but I don't see why the NFL does.
 

azsouthendzone

ASFN Addict
Joined
Feb 10, 2004
Posts
5,620
Reaction score
1,322
Correct, mine requires a large deposit, even if the install is completely without making any penetrations (using a dish stand and running the wire through an open door.) I'm sure it's probably illegal but since we knew we wouldn't stay for too long I never even considered challenging it.

I'd love to have Directv but I'm not going to make a decision on where to live based on whether or not I can get directv, at least not as long as my girlfriend has a say in it.

:D

I just find it hard to believe that Directv is paying so much that the NFL can't get more by simply selling them both access. I see why Directv wants exclusivity it's a huge selling point for them, but I don't see why the NFL does.
Funny thing is that back when I used to live in apartments, I actually did base where I lived on Directv. In my opinion, it is that much better.
 

Kel Varnsen

Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Moderator Emeritus
Joined
Jun 28, 2003
Posts
33,369
Reaction score
11,994
Location
Phoenix
That ad is a bit misleading. What's to say that those 222 million people aren't satisfied with the amount of football they watched?

If the NFL really cared about its fans, it would make the Sunday Ticket package available to cable and DBS and not just take the extra billions DirecTV was willing to pay for exclusivity.

(Not that I really care...I see all the Cardinal games.) :thumbup:
 

abomb

Registered User
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2003
Posts
21,836
Reaction score
1
Probably not. The subsidy that directv is and has been paying probably eclipses the revenue from total subscibers combined. What is more baffling is why people still choose cable tv over Directv.

Show me the cost benefit of switching from Cox (expanded digital with DVR, HD and the sports tier) to a comparable one-room package with DirecTV. It doesnt add up.
 

cardsfanmd

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 16, 2007
Posts
13,966
Reaction score
4,156
Location
annapolis, md
Direct TV is only in business because they have NFL Sunday Ticket. The rest of their features dont even come close to what cable offers. i will say that i am pissed that NFL Net. was free last year and now I have to pay for it.
 

azsouthendzone

ASFN Addict
Joined
Feb 10, 2004
Posts
5,620
Reaction score
1,322
Show me the cost benefit of switching from Cox (expanded digital with DVR, HD and the sports tier) to a comparable one-room package with DirecTV. It doesnt add up.

I have all that and it adds up to about $70 a month which was less, so it does add up. Either way, the quality is better. Channel 0-100 on Cox looks like TV from the 1970s, but to each his own.
 

abomb

Registered User
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2003
Posts
21,836
Reaction score
1
I have all that and it adds up to about $70 a month which was less, so it does add up. Either way, the quality is better. Channel 0-100 on Cox looks like TV from the 1970s, but to each his own.

But you forgot the cost of the HD/DVR receiver, which last I looked was $300.
 

azsouthendzone

ASFN Addict
Joined
Feb 10, 2004
Posts
5,620
Reaction score
1,322
Direct TV is only in business because they have NFL Sunday Ticket. The rest of their features dont even come close to what cable offers. i will say that i am pissed that NFL Net. was free last year and now I have to pay for it.

Hahaha. Yeah, ok, and the Ravens are going to force the Redskins to relocate:D
 

azsouthendzone

ASFN Addict
Joined
Feb 10, 2004
Posts
5,620
Reaction score
1,322
But you forgot the cost of the HD/DVR receiver, which last I looked was $300.

I have two which were $0 each. Of course they will ask for the $300, but if you tell them "DisH Network and cable will give it to me for free" they will be at your house that weekend with your whole set up, for free. They buckle like Mark Bulger under pressure.
 

bratwurst

on double secret probation
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
5,940
Reaction score
1
Location
Santo Poco
If I were single, I'd blow the whistle on the whole thing and get rid of my TV and move to Vegas. If I wanted to watch sports on Sunday, there's plenty of sports books to choose from.
 

abomb

Registered User
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2003
Posts
21,836
Reaction score
1
I have two which were $0 each. Of course they will ask for the $300, but if you tell them "DisH Network and cable will give it to me for free" they will be at your house that weekend with your whole set up, for free. They buckle like Mark Bulger under pressure.

Now you tell me! :)

I will have to give it a shot.
 

D-Dogg

A Whole New World
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2003
Posts
45,006
Reaction score
1,079
Location
In The End Zone
Yeah but then my Internets and Phone would go through the roof because I no longer would get the bundle discount.


Plus, I looked at Direct TVs actual HD offering and it was paltry...they don't seem to offer as much as they claim.
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,291
Reaction score
11,925

D-Dogg

A Whole New World
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2003
Posts
45,006
Reaction score
1,079
Location
In The End Zone
gimmick. 100 channels includes local channels from major markets.

Thats like including ABC in Los Angeles, New York, and Boston, and counting that as 3 new channels.

Exactly. They do that in other ways too.

I looked hard into getting Direct TV to save money (god knows I need to) but in the end I felt Cox gave me what I needed and that Direct TV's bark was a lot bigger than its bite.
 

azsouthendzone

ASFN Addict
Joined
Feb 10, 2004
Posts
5,620
Reaction score
1,322
Yeah but then my Internets and Phone would go through the roof because I no longer would get the bundle discount.


Plus, I looked at Direct TVs actual HD offering and it was paltry...they don't seem to offer as much as they claim.

Directv will have 25 new HD channels by the end of this month and 100 new channels by the end of the year including NFL Network and almost everything else you can think of, even NHL Network (Canadian Channel). No one will be able to match that for some time. If you actually break down the bundle, it is still less just to cancel cable and keep internet and phone by itself. By the way, you can get internet through Cox for $25 per.
 

D-Dogg

A Whole New World
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2003
Posts
45,006
Reaction score
1,079
Location
In The End Zone

azsouthendzone

ASFN Addict
Joined
Feb 10, 2004
Posts
5,620
Reaction score
1,322

Forum statistics

Threads
556,156
Posts
5,433,917
Members
6,329
Latest member
cardinals2025
Top