Because they indicate that these are 2 similar players. They aren't, anyone who watches the NBA regularly would know that.
No, it indicated they has similar years, which is what I originally stated.
No, it hasn't. There was a reason that Williams was the #2 pick, and Morris #13. As I explained above, Williams has the potential to improve and be a starter. Morris is what he is, an ok bench player with neither the size nor the athleticism or talent to be much more than that.
Subjective on both sides.
I don't know why I'm arguing this with a die hard KU fan, just out of curiosity, what about Morris leads you to believe he has potential to be much more than he is? Have you ever watched Williams play?
I will, because you are. It's hard to believe any neutral fan would say they have equal potential.
What's with the ad hominems?
I think Morris is a better off the ball rebounder and a better defender. Morris also knows how to pass the ball and play team basketball, something Williams never learned as the only guy at UofA playing ball hog and only caring about the half of the court his basket was on.
Williams is an athlete who's yet to learn the game of basketball, Morris is a basketball player. That's the difference.
Regardless of this, I've never used the word potential except to say that Williams hasn't lived up to his. I said they were equal last year and the stats bear that out. That Williams is still "unrealized potential" isn't really selling me honestly. Neither one of these guys is going to be LBJ or Kobe, so they'd better learn a roll. I think Morris has a much better shot at that than Williams.
If I'm a homer about anything, it's that KU players tend to learn the game of team basketball and how to be a player on defense as well as offense.