Cap Usage

Chris_Sanders

Not Always The Best Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
40,163
Reaction score
31,690
Location
Scottsdale, Az
It's kind of crazy that this is our ranking in cap allotment

#1. LBs
#2. OL
#3. WR
#4. Secondary

Now think about team weakness and what we are drafting at #8
 

pinetopred

Registered
Joined
May 17, 2002
Posts
756
Reaction score
215
Yeah when you have highly paid guys at those positions but still don't have a complete unit makes sense, but I bet if you look at most teams that's where most of the money is spent LT/OLB/CB/WR/QB we are fortunate to have a QB rookie contract right now.
 

AZCrazy

ASFN Lifer
Joined
May 18, 2014
Posts
3,984
Reaction score
2,562
Well, we do have the best LB in the league in Chandler Jones, possibly the best WR in Hopkins and a former best WR in Fitz.

The O Line is made up of free agents who were paid to be here. No young guys on early contracts starting for us. (Unless you count Murray, but we're paying Gilbert).

The reason our O Line wasn't awful last year as it had been the previous two was that they stayed healthy. Hump, Sweez, Ship, and Pugh started every game.
 
OP
OP
Chris_Sanders

Chris_Sanders

Not Always The Best Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
40,163
Reaction score
31,690
Location
Scottsdale, Az
Well according to some, we shouldn't draft positions where we have spent money already. Unfortunately actual facts directly disputes the assertion on money allocation.

Really though this is an indictment of the ability to get good rookies at key positions later in the draft.
 

Solar7

Go Suns
Joined
May 18, 2002
Posts
11,172
Reaction score
12,108
Location
Las Vegas, NV
Well according to some, we shouldn't draft positions where we have spent money already. Unfortunately actual facts directly disputes the assertion on money allocation.

Really though this is an indictment of the ability to get good rookies at key positions later in the draft.
Yeah, as you've mentioned, this is the issue when your GM flops miserably at the draft for multiple years running, only getting maybe one adequate player a year, and spending subsequent drafts or free agency replacing positions you just drafted. To get adequate players, we have had to overpay.

I'm not against drafting positions where we have spent money, as long as there are holes. Give me Simmons, an OL, or Brown all day. I'm just not willing to invest more when the position group is good-to-adequate.

Unfortunately I think both Keim and some fans have also gotten too used to immediately judging players and not giving them time to develop. Obviously it was the right move with Rosen and Murray, but keep up that habit and the football team will just never catch up.
 

CardsSunsDbacks

Not So Skeptical
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Posts
10,143
Reaction score
6,582
Aren't those the rooms with the most players though? We run a 3-4 base so we are going to have more LBs than DLs, OL takes up 5 starters and 4-5 backups, WR usually accounts for at least 7 players and the secondary has 4-6 starters depending on what exactly you consider your base package to be. QB, RB, DL and TE all tend to be smaller groups.
 

Zeno

Ancient
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
15,589
Reaction score
5,435
Location
Fort Myers
I was listening to the Cardinals podcast recently and Jurecki said that the cap could go up $40 million next year...where is he getting that number from? That is hugely significant.
 

GuernseyCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Dec 29, 2012
Posts
10,123
Reaction score
5,681
Location
London UK
Well, we do have the best LB in the league in Chandler Jones, possibly the best WR in Hopkins and a former best WR in Fitz.

The O Line is made up of free agents who were paid to be here. No young guys on early contracts starting for us. (Unless you count Murray, but we're paying Gilbert).

The reason our O Line wasn't awful last year as it had been the previous two was that they stayed healthy. Hump, Sweez, Ship, and Pugh started every game.

Cole at centre.
 
Top