- Joined
- Apr 25, 2009
- Posts
- 1,589
- Reaction score
- 1
Im not a fan of this move as i dont see him as a real upgrade over anything we already have. The only way it would make sense if they believe Lutui isnt resigning. The guy allowed 8 sacks last season and though are guys werent great last season none of them was that bad. Reggie Wells no matter how bad he looked at times i dont think was charged with any sack and if Lutui resigns as everyone expects he'd still be a better guard imho then Faneca, plus you have potential break out rookies in Keith and Johnson as a well as good vet back up in Bridges. You dont replace potential turnstiles with a more open turnstile.
Totally agree.Alan is down to the threads on his tires.Its not like the Adam Timmerman signing on his second contract after winning a ring with the packers in 2 SB's,That dude rose the level of play with pro bowlers like Pace even.The rams won the SB that first year after Timmerman signed too.This is MUCH different.
I really wish Deuce would sign.we're not gonna let him walk to play for Carrol in Seattle.We are still gonna throw the ball with Matt & he may show skills to be really good at it in our 4 wide sets.
So we mix it up more and run more play action with Matt.So be it.I love our new slot reciever even though everyone knew I loved the longhorn WR for our spot and he was picked earlier in the round we got OUR new KR and field stretcher slot reciever from THE CITADEL where he dominated like Rice & Bruce did at small schools.
I really wonder if Faneca brings anything but attitude.We already have the depth and faneca was gonna already get his 5.5 from the Jets anyway.So we get him on the cheap,if you think he's worth it?I like our own homegrown players myself.
Don't kill me.