Cards' 2011 Offseason: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,391
Reaction score
29,777
Location
Gilbert, AZ
It seems like the Cards' 2011 offseason is largely complete. The veteran acquisitions will sign their contracts and begin practicing tomorrow, the General Manager has turned his focus to Larry Fitzgerald, and there isn't much left on the free agent market besides troubled players or roster filler. So I'll give my evaluation of the 2011 offseason (so far).

The Good
- Getting what we wanted for the quarterback position. The Cards really weren't interested in the free agent quarterbacks available. They only had eyes for Kevin Kolb, and they got their man. There are no excuses for play at the quarterback position for the next three years, because the coaching staff and front office got the quarterback they coveted.

- Signing Kolb to a good contract. My greatest fear was that we would extend Kolb to a contract that would hang around the franchise's neck like an albatross for the next half-decade. Thankfully, that wasn't the case. The guaranteed money given up for Kolb ensures that he's the starter for the next two years, but will also put him on a short leash in 2013 and not prevent the Cardinals from investing a high pick at the position in the 2013 draft.

- Re-signing Deuce Lutui. It didn't go the way that anyone had planned, but the Cardinals' most consistent offensive lineman the last two seasons has returned and is reportedly more motivated than ever. Lutui is a player that a team needs to keep around. He clearly loves the team and the community. I don't care how much you weigh: welcome back, big guy.

- Signing a veteran cornerback. The Cards easily could have gone into the 2011 season with Toler, Peterson, and Mike Adams as the core of the cornerback group. They wisely opted to get a legitimate outside competitor for Toler and Peterson in the free agent market.

- Building a tight-end corps. For years the Arizona Cardinals have had the least talented tight end group in the NFL. By signing Todd Heap, Jeff King, drafting Housler, and continuing to develop Jim Dray, the Cards don't have near the strongest TE crew in the NFL, but they have a unit they can legitimately compete with.

- Finding help along the defensive line. Alan Branch and Gabe Watson turned out being poor fits to the scheme, and the Cards did a good job bringing in Nick Eason and Vonnie Holliday to bolster the most talented group on the defense.

- Making a clean break on Tim Hightower. Timmy Hightower was in danger of becoming The Guy You Turn To When Things Go Wrong. The issue is that Hightower is never going to straighten out his fumbling problem, and the Cards can't depend on him in important situations. The fact that the front office got anything at all for a running back who can't hold on to the football is the single greatest accomplishment of the 2011 offseason.

The Bad

- Giving up too much for what you wanted at the quarterback position. This is the last time I'll say it: The Cards gave up too much for Kevin Kolb. If Kolb turns out to be a Pro Bowl quarterback, they'll still have given up too much to get him. The coaching staff and front office staked their jobs on a guy who has started 7 games in the NFL.

- Failing to acquire a legitimate rush linebacker. I have as high hopes for O'Brien Schofield and (to a lesser extent) Sam Acho as anyone here, but hope is not a plan. The Cardinals' reconfigured secondary will only be as good as the pass rush in front of them. When Joey Porter elected to reduce his salary for 2011, it likely closed the book on the Cardinals looking for outside help in the pass rush. Inexplicably, Matt Roth remains unsigned. The ridiculous contract extension for Kamerion Wembley may have complicated free agent signings for pass rushers for quite some time.

- No help for the offensive tackles. It looks like we're running with Levi Brown, Jeremy Bridges, and Brandon Keith for at least the start of the 2011 season. After how well this group performed at protecting the passer in 2010, it's easy to see why the coaching staff has such faith in these guys. The Cardinals didn't need to invest a ton of money in free agents for this position, but they needed to bring in legitimate competition for Brown especially.

- Wide receiver question marks. Hope is not a plan, but the Cards are hoping that Andre Roberts, Early Doucet, Stephen Williams, or Chansi Stuckey are going to be dependable second or third options for Kevin Kolb in the passing attack. Steve Breaston became a go-to target for shaky Derek Anderson early in the season because he had an ability to get open quickly and move the chains. The Cards weren't willing to take a risk on Breaston's balky knees, which is understandable. The Cards are depending on an aging Todd Heap to come to Kevin Kolb's aid in those few situations where Larry Fitzgerald is covered.

- Risky calculated risks. There were safer options than linebacker Stewart Bradley and cornerback Richard Marshall on the free agency market. The Cards made a commitment to Bradley to be a medium-term fixture on the defensive interior despite injury and poor play the last two seasons for the Eagles. Richard Marshall was one of the worst starting corners in the NFL last season despite being on a team with a double-digit sack artist and a solid overall defense.

The Ugly

- Dismantling the core of the team. A year ago if you'd asked what the core of the Arizona Cardinals was, it would be Fitzgerald, Wilson, Dockett, Lutui... and DRC. Those were the proven commodities on the team. One of those pieces is off the team, and another in Wilson had a deep drop-off in performance. A third is on a one-year contract. It's hard to have confidence in a 2010 draft class that helped the team to a 5-11 record their first year and were prohibited from working out at the facility in their first full offseason. If Larry Fitzgerald isn't happy with the direction of the team enough to sign a long-term contract extension, the long-term future of the franchise will look very bleak indeed.

- The Great Can Kick of 2011 At this moment, four of eleven projected offensive starters and four of eleven defensive starters are on one-year contracts or in the last year of their deals. Continuity is the number one factor for successful NFL franchises. If the Cards can't extend at least Fitzgerald, Campbell, and one of the offensive tackles in-season, the team is going to be looking at another exodus of talent they have developed over four years and a re-shaping of the roster. It's also possible that with the additions of Marshall, Eason, and Heap they've somehow managed to get older. The exodus of homegrown talent has to end at some point if the Cardinals are going to have consistent success.
 
Joined
Nov 15, 2002
Posts
13,301
Reaction score
1,175
Location
SE Valley
Signing a veteran cornerback. The Cards easily could have gone into the 2011 season with Toler, Peterson, and Mike Adams as the core of the cornerback group. They wisely opted to get a legitimate outside competitor for Toler and Peterson in the free agent market.
This was a move the surprised/impressed me significantly. It would have been an outright coup to have gotten Asomugha. But when DRC was traded away which of us didn't have the thought, "Crap, they took a position of strength and made it a weakness! The Cardinals are going into the season with only Toler, Peterson, and Adams as their corners."

- Failing to acquire a legitimate rush linebacker. I have as high hopes for O'Brien Schofield and (to a lesser extent) Sam Acho as anyone here, but hope is not a plan. The Cardinals' reconfigured secondary will only be as good as the pass rush in front of them. When Joey Porter elected to reduce his salary for 2011, it likely closed the book on the Cardinals looking for outside help in the pass rush.
IMO the greatest failing of the off-season!


The exodus of homegrown talent has to end at some point if the Cardinals are going to have consistent success.
Agreed!
 

Catfish

Registered
Joined
Aug 14, 2006
Posts
4,551
Reaction score
64
Very astute analysis K-9. While I am astounded at the productivity mustered by our FO and scouting department during the FA period, I am saddened to see that they have stopped just short of filling ALL the needs while the money is available, and the players are available too.

I chalk the overspending on Kolb up to everybody's determination to fix the QB situation. I guess that was inevitable. I don't understand the failure to address the backup NT situation, (despite the two added defensive ends on the roster). I know that they can be (used as a NT), but so can an OG be used as an OT. The results are hardly ever satisfactory though. This is the philosophy that gets the Cardinals in trouble so much in my opinion. (Going on the cheap to see if we can get by with what we already have). I don't believe that this is a product of the FO this time, but rather was a decision by the HC. It appears that the FO was prepared to do whatever was needed.

With the San Diego WR saying that he would like to play here, I think we are missing out on acquiring a solid #2. At 6'5" he would be a target much like Randy Moss, (though definitely not as gifted). But he would also not bring the baggage that Moss would have brought. I believe we are missing out on that count.

As for a LT to eventually replace Brown, it would appear that they intend to wait until the next draft to solve that riddle, (which is OK because there is some real talent available there). I just don't know if we will have a high enough draft slot to be able to sign one of them without trading into the position. After all, if we are successful on the field this year, and win the division, we will be drafting middle to late first round.
 

JeffGollin

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
20,472
Reaction score
3,056
Location
Holmdel, NJ
Nice post K-9.

One easy to lose element in the CB shuffle was the new DC,s commitment to physical play and hard tackling by Card corners.

DRC was arguably the best athlete ever to play the position for the Cards, but was a bit inconsistent and unreliable as a tackler.

Toler can tackle. Peterson has the reputation for being physical. Even Jefferson in limited appearances showed a willingness to hit. Marshall is said to be physical also. Mike Adams, while small, will light you up.

This gives us 5 corners who are hitters.

Cool.
 

Crazy Canuck

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
10,077
Reaction score
0
Nice post K-9.

One easy to lose element in the CB shuffle was the new DC,s commitment to physical play and hard tackling by Card corners.

DRC was arguably the best athlete ever to play the position for the Cards, but was a bit inconsistent and unreliable as a tackler.

Toler can tackle. Peterson has the reputation for being physical. Even Jefferson in limited appearances showed a willingness to hit. Marshall is said to be physical also. Mike Adams, while small, will light you up.

This gives us 5 corners who are hitters.

Cool.

and I read that Marshall was Pittsburgh's target if they lost Ike Taylor. Gives one an idea as to why our new DC wanted him.
 

Cardiac

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
12,062
Reaction score
3,331
Very good write up K-9.

I do wish the Cards would have added competition to the OT position but I'm not freaked out about Bridges filling in for an ineffective Levi.

I'm actually happy with the ILB position at this point. Bradley has shown he can be VERY good in the NFL so I'm good with the calculated risk.

If Kolb becomes a Pro Bowl QB then they got fantastic value in the trade.

Not sure what other options were available in FA for a pass rushing OLB in FA this year. Actually I'm fairly confident that any signing by the Cards of the available FA's would have been more of a hail mary then calculate risk.

We have lost far too many draft picks in the past 2/3 years and this trend has to stop. Finally Cardinal luck changed and Lutui learned what the coaches have been telling him forever, you are good but being fat holds you back from being great. If the Bengals say, "Dude, you are fat and we won't pay you" and few if any offers came from other teams then.....You are too fat. Lutui now gets this so time for you to see the light.

Time for the Cards to re-sign their draft picks!! Fitz, CC, BK and etc. need to get extended soon.
 
OP
OP
kerouac9

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,391
Reaction score
29,777
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Very good write up K-9.

I do wish the Cards would have added competition to the OT position but I'm not freaked out about Bridges filling in for an ineffective Levi.

I'm not freaked out, but I'm disappointed that they're putting the eggs in this basket again after competition clearly didn't raise anyone's game last year.

I'm actually happy with the ILB position at this point. Bradley has shown he can be VERY good in the NFL so I'm good with the calculated risk.

I'm cautiously optimistic. I kind of would've liked to see them bring in another veteran on a one-year deal and then maybe tried to stash Sturdivant on the practice squad. Bradley lost his job last year due to poor play to a couple of guys no one's ever heard of. We could probably still bring in Brandon Moore or Stephen Cooper (both 3-4 ILBs and both from San Diego) to provide competition and insurance in case Bradley's body doesn't hold up.

This'll be two years in a row that the Cards are betting their run defense on guys who have shown injury history. It's a nice gamble because I think the upside is high (although I'm not sure about "VERY" good--he's a solid enough player but maybe not among the top 15 ILBs around the league), but I like to hedge my bets.

If Kolb becomes a Pro Bowl QB then they got fantastic value in the trade.

Maybe. I don't know. I'm still burned that they gave up David Boston for nothing, because he had value when they let him leave. If you paid $10 a share for Apple stock after the Newton failed and it was trading for $7 a share, did you still make a good trade? It goes for $350 a share today.

Not sure what other options were available in FA for a pass rushing OLB in FA this year. Actually I'm fairly confident that any signing by the Cards of the available FA's would have been more of a hail mary then calculate risk.

There certainly were no sure things, but there were better options than Joey Porter's decomposing corpse. Matt Roth is still available, and Andre Carter would be a great one-year hedge and could be a down rusher in passing situations.
 

Cardiac

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
12,062
Reaction score
3,331
I'm not freaked out, but I'm disappointed that they're putting the eggs in this basket again after competition clearly didn't raise anyone's game last year.

It would be nice for Levi to have some competition. I'm guessing that OC Miller will use the TE and RB's more to help him out.


I'm cautiously optimistic. I kind of would've liked to see them bring in another veteran on a one-year deal and then maybe tried to stash Sturdivant on the practice squad. Bradley lost his job last year due to poor play to a couple of guys no one's ever heard of. We could probably still bring in Brandon Moore or Stephen Cooper (both 3-4 ILBs and both from San Diego) to provide competition and insurance in case Bradley's body doesn't hold up.

I agree.

This'll be two years in a row that the Cards are betting their run defense on guys who have shown injury history. It's a nice gamble because I think the upside is high (although I'm not sure about "VERY" good--he's a solid enough player but maybe not among the top 15 ILBs around the league), but I like to hedge my bets.

Yes and no. I think we all know the checkbook was closed pretty tight last year so this year may be a far better calculated risk. I do agree that one of the Chargers LBers would be a could call.



Maybe. I don't know. I'm still burned that they gave up David Boston for nothing, because he had value when they let him leave. If you paid $10 a share for Apple stock after the Newton failed and it was trading for $7 a share, did you still make a good trade? It goes for $350 a share today.

If Kolb is a pro bowl QB then I really don't care what DRC's stock sells for.


There certainly were no sure things, but there were better options than Joey Porter's decomposing corpse. Matt Roth is still available, and Andre Carter would be a great one-year hedge and could be a down rusher in passing situations.

If you get a chance listen to Horton's interview with MJ. He doesn't give Porter a glowing endorsement but seems to think he still has something left in the tank. I'm with you in that Porter couldn't even get hurries with only 1 blocker to beat.

 

Seandonic

Gotta love that Cardinal red!
Joined
Aug 25, 2010
Posts
1,753
Reaction score
5
There are two guys who I never thought would last this long in free agency and still not be on the Cardinals roster. OLB Matt Roth and OT Jared Gaither.

I can see the Cards passing on Gaither because they really seem to believe in Brown and signed TE King to help block on the edge. Roth, however is just sitting there and could add the veteran (not ancient: Porter and Haggans) presence and production the Cards (IMHO) need.
 

DoTheDew

Registered
Joined
Dec 8, 2007
Posts
2,967
Reaction score
0
- Giving up too much for what you wanted at the quarterback position. This is the last time I'll say it: The Cards gave up too much for Kevin Kolb. If Kolb turns out to be a Pro Bowl quarterback, they'll still have given up too much to get him. The coaching staff and front office staked their jobs on a guy who has started 7 games in the NFL.

This is only true if the Eagles were willing to give him up for less. If he is the guy we wanted and turns out to be a pro bowl QB and we couldn't have had him for less then there is no better deal. Whether or not we could have had him for less is completely a matter of opinion. I'm of the view that the Eagles truly would have kept him on their bench for the year before trading him for less.

- Dismantling the core of the team. A year ago if you'd asked what the core of the Arizona Cardinals was, it would be Fitzgerald, Wilson, Dockett, Lutui... and DRC. Those were the proven commodities on the team. One of those pieces is off the team, and another in Wilson had a deep drop-off in performance. A third is on a one-year contract. It's hard to have confidence in a 2010 draft class that helped the team to a 5-11 record their first year and were prohibited from working out at the facility in their first full offseason. If Larry Fitzgerald isn't happy with the direction of the team enough to sign a long-term contract extension, the long-term future of the franchise will look very bleak indeed.

- The Great Can Kick of 2011 At this moment, four of eleven projected offensive starters and four of eleven defensive starters are on one-year contracts or in the last year of their deals. Continuity is the number one factor for successful NFL franchises. If the Cards can't extend at least Fitzgerald, Campbell, and one of the offensive tackles in-season, the team is going to be looking at another exodus of talent they have developed over four years and a re-shaping of the roster. It's also possible that with the additions of Marshall, Eason, and Heap they've somehow managed to get older. The exodus of homegrown talent has to end at some point if the Cardinals are going to have consistent success.

This is all true, but I'm telling you this is just the way things are going to be in the NFL and every team deals with it. It's going to only get worse now that 1st round picks are on 4 year contracts. The difference between a bad team and a good team isn't that the good teams never have their good players leave or hit the market, it's that they know when to hold them and when to fold them. Our short coming has been that we let top talent walk for nothing. We've been at least improving somewhat. We actually got something back for Boldin and DRC. And with DRC we at least had what we believe is a competent replacement before parting with him unlike, say Dansby.
 

desertdawg

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Posts
21,831
Reaction score
1
Location
@Desertdawg777


- Giving up too much for what you wanted at the quarterback position. This is the last time I'll say it: The Cards gave up too much for Kevin Kolb. T If Kolb turns out to be a Pro Bowl quarterback, they'll still have given up too much to get him. The coaching staff and front office staked their jobs on a guy who has started 7 games in the NFL.
Wager?:p
 

Jetstream Green

Kool Aid with a touch of vodka
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
29,476
Reaction score
16,649
Location
San Antonio, Texas
QB most important position on the field

if Kolb turns out to be a Pro-Bowl QB with an extended career with the Cardinals, there is NO WAY they gave up too much....the fact he only started seven games in which they rolled the dice on would become mute. I do agree with rest of your write up 100%
 
OP
OP
kerouac9

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,391
Reaction score
29,777
Location
Gilbert, AZ
This is all true, but I'm telling you this is just the way things are going to be in the NFL and every team deals with it. It's going to only get worse now that 1st round picks are on 4 year contracts. The difference between a bad team and a good team isn't that the good teams never have their good players leave or hit the market, it's that they know when to hold them and when to fold them. Our short coming has been that we let top talent walk for nothing. We've been at least improving somewhat. We actually got something back for Boldin and DRC. And with DRC we at least had what we believe is a competent replacement before parting with him unlike, say Dansby.

Based on what--your gut feeling? You know who doesn't "deal with" that problem? The NFL teams who make the playoffs year in and year out. Again, teams like the Steelers, Colts, Patriots (to some extent, although this is the closest model you're referring to), and Packers identify the core of their team and keep them together for their careers. They don't hit on every draft pick, but the ones that do stick around for most of their careers. Pretty much every starter on the Packers' roster last year with the exception of Charles Woodson (who's a man-beast) was home-grown. Same thing with the Steelers.


I don't think I've said #7's name on this board since I promised I wouldn't, and that's been a year. I'm done repeating myself and the truth will out.
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,630
Posts
5,408,740
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top