Would it be nice to have a big name. heck yes. But....
I would rather have 6 Solid starters then 1 big name and 3 below average guys. I truley believe you are only as strong as your weakest link, so having solid starters from top to bottom is the route I would rather take.
As for all of this Huff talk, you may have still not liked his play (which I think is debatable, but will save that for another time) but he was still a huge upgrade to the 2004 WLB spot, he was a good FA pickup in that regard, especially considering his price.
If we upgrade spots along the OL, DT, and FS with solid starters we will be much further along and much upgrade compared to last year would we not? In fact I say we are a good playoff team if that happens.
Also take a look at the big time, big name, big contract FA signings of guys switching teams from the last 3 years or so. More times then not those signings didnt turn out like they thought they would and look to be bad contracts now.
Also Green and Graves said huge contracts that Alexander or James would get. They didnt say they wont spend money, such as that of Okeafer and Berry who recieved some pretty good contracts in the 30 Mill. You have 4 types of FA's. Your elites who are Alexander and James who will get huge money. Then you have your top tier guys such as our very own Berry and Okeafer and maybe Lewis or Bentley who will not get nearly as much as Alexander or James, then you have your mid tier guys such as the Macklins of the world who are solid starter and make your team better, then you have your low tier low money guys such as Femi who play their role, then your low tier and bust FA's. The article says we wont sign any Elite type FA's, doesnt mean we wont go after top tier FA's or mid tier FA's. There are still a lot of good players to be had besides an Alexander or James.
Now if we dont go after and sign any top tier FA's, then I will be pissed.