Clarification

fordronken

Registered User
Joined
Oct 17, 2002
Posts
3,806
Reaction score
0
Location
Los Angeles area
If the Clippers match the offer for Quentin Richardson and the Suns do not spend the rest of their cap space or use it in a trade before next year, then we would end up over the cap due to inevitable extensions(likely with Joe Johnson), right?

If that's true, then if the Clips match, it wouldn't be a very big deal to overpay someone who would actually help us, would it? Maybe using it in trades would be more worthwhile. Dunno.
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,908
Reaction score
10,594
Location
L.A. area
If the Clippers match the offer for Quentin Richardson and the Suns do not spend the rest of their cap space or use it in a trade before next year, then we would end up over the cap due to inevitable extensions(likely with Joe Johnson), right?

Not quite. If the Suns want to exceed the cap in order to re-sign Johnson, they must hold onto his rights. That takes up cap space, to the tune of some percentage of his last (i.e. this) year's salary. I think it's 125%, but I'll look up the source. If the Suns were to have cap space leftover after accounting for Johnson, they could use it on free agents, then use Johnson's Bird rights to extend him for whatever they wanted.

I'll try to look up the source. Stand by...

Edit: Okay, the source is

http://members.cox.net/lmcoon/salarycap.htm#28

And it turns out that, while I had the basic idea right, I was just a tad off on the number. It's not 125% of the last year's salary, it's (ahem) 300%. 300% of Johnson's '04-'05 salary would be $7.1 million, so you'd add that to the team salary of (as things presently stand) probably somewhere around $31.5 million, assuming ballpark $10 million flat for Nash in '05-'06.

And that means that, if the cap for '05-'06 remains somewhere around $44 million, the Suns would be looking at MLE money -- which they'd have if they went over the cap anyway.

So basically, yeah, you're right: the Suns might as well spend now, as far as the ability to pursue free agents is concerned.
 
Last edited:

George O'Brien

ASFN Icon
Joined
Nov 22, 2003
Posts
10,297
Reaction score
0
Location
Sun City
This is part of the reason that getting rid of Eisley for someone with a one year deal is so attractive. Getting Eisley off contract next year would clear cap before the re-sign contracts kill any chance of above MLE free agency signings. By the time Eisley comes off salary, the Suns will have used up most of the space with Johnson and the scheduled increases for Marion and Nash.

Of course, we don't know how the new players contract will work. It is possible that the system will be radically changed and cap management strategies completely altered.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
562,833
Posts
5,488,990
Members
6,340
Latest member
Beers
Top