DBacks Rotation Still In Question

The Commish

youknowhatimsayin?
Joined
Jun 16, 2004
Posts
2,201
Reaction score
11
Location
San Francisco
Key question to D-Backs - who'll be Nos. 4, 5 starters


John Gambadoro
Special for azcentral.com
Dec. 12, 2005 09:50 AM



The biggest question surrounding the Arizona Diamondbacks isn't who will play centerfield or shortstop but what the pitching rotation will look like. With Javier Vazquez on the way out - a deal was almost agreed to on Sunday and could be done by later today - and Shawn Estes not coming back, Arizona has two holes to fill in the starting rotation.

It looks like Brandon Webb will make the move up the rotation to staff ace after a solid year in which he went 14-12 with a 3.54 ERA and 172 strikeouts in 229 innings. Webb is a workhorse, having thrown more than 200 innings in each of the past two years, but has never been put in the No. 1 spot. In fact two years ago when he attempted to step up into the No. 2 spot behind Randy Johnson, following the Curt Schilling trade, he struggled. Part of that was the lack of defense behind him. He tried to make too many perfect pitches and ended up walking 119 batters and going 7-16, although his 3.59 ERA was good.

Russ Ortiz could fill the second or third spot in the rotation. He has watched his numbers get worse in each of the past four years, but none were as bad as last year, when he went 5-11 with a 6.89 ERA. He battled a rib injury and only made 22 starts, and he won only one of his final 11 starts and had Diamondback fans wondering why the team invested $33 million over four years in him. Arizona is stuck with Ortiz and will have its fingers crossed that he will bounce back and pitch the way he did when he was a reliable starter with the San Francisco Giants.

Claudio Varags went 9-6 with a 4.84 ERA with Arizona after being claimed off waivers by Washington and is a decent 3 or 4 starter. At times he was the D-Backs' best pitcher and showed enough that he is being penciled into a starter's role.

Just who the other two starters are will be determined in the next few months. The Diamondbacks will bring back a starting pitcher in any deal involving Vazquez. There are four teams bidding on his services, including the Washington Nationals and New York Mets. The Diamondbacks are not interested in Kris Benson, whom the Mets would like to trade. They are, however, interested in Boston's Matt Clement and if a deal involving Troy Glaus can be worked out, Clement could be coming back to the National League.

So at least one of the new starters will come via trade. Another could come from a group that includes Brad Halsey, Edgar Gonzalez and Dustin Nippert, although Arizona would like Nippert to open the season in Triple A. Arizona is not interested in any of the high dollar free-agent pitchers available such as Jarrod Washburn, Kevin Millwood and Jeff Weaver. The team could still sign a free-agent starter but that person would likely be someone who is younger and more cost efficient.

The impending loss of Vazquez will not be a big one. He struggled with consistency all year and ended up going 11-15 with a 4.42 ERA - not what Arizona expected from a guy making $11 million. By trading Vazquez, Arizona will clear $24 million in salary over the next two years, money they can use elsewhere to balance out the 11-man pitching staff.

The Diamondbacks almost got themselves a future ace in Joel Zamaya, a hard throwing right-hander from Detroit. Zamaya may not have started with the big club this year but certainly is a top of the line starter who could have joined the rotation next year. But Vazquez included the Tigers on his list of six teams he cannot be traded to and the deal for Zamaya and centerfielder Curtis Gunderson fell through.

The Diamondbacks may not have a defined staff ace when the season starts. They could have five above-average guys to try to throw every five days. But they also may have the financial flexibility to be a bigger player in free agency next year. And while this free-agent pitching class was nothing to write home about, next year's class will include A's lefty Barry Zito.

The Diamondbacks will field a team this year and attempt to compete in the West. But they understand that they are not close to competing for a World Series right now. They have cooled on adding Cubs centerfielder Cory Patterson and determined that Nomar Garciaparra would not be a good fit in centerfield. They also wouldn't have come close to the $4 million offer that Garciaparra has on the table from the Baltimore Orioles. The good news is, the organization has determined Connor Jackson, Carlos Quentin, Stephen Drew - and even Nippert to some extent - are untouchable. By 2007 all of those players should be regulars in the Diamondbacks' lineup.

So while Arizona tries to fill some key holes and be competitive, it is doing it with one eye on the future. And any pitching the team brings back in deals will take that longer-term approach into consideration.
 

devilfan02

Registered
Joined
Nov 12, 2005
Posts
3,399
Reaction score
0
Location
Scottsdale, AZ
I still think we shoud have offered Estes arbitration. I dont know what he was demanding but I think he is a solid 4 or 5 guy. If he wanted more than 2 years, no way. I wouldn't mind a Glaus for Clement deal. He pitched very well last season until he got hit in the head by a line drive and went in the tank from there. He would def be a good addition to this staff.
 

KingLouieLouie

Going Old School!
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2003
Posts
5,532
Reaction score
46
Location
Phoenix, AZ
Here's a list of the mid-lower tier FA starters that the Dbacks may be interested in:

You must be registered for see images attach

Tony Armas

True, Armas has been rather injury-prone throughout his career, but whenever he his healthy he can be a decent #3 or #4 starter.....He's only 27 and could be a low-risk, high-reward type signing.... If he's willing to accept a 1-year deal plus an option for another year, then that would be a fairly solid signing.... Although, the Dbacks dont usually offer those incentive-laden contracts, he should be offered a deal that includes bonuses for innings, starts, etc....

You must be registered for see images attach

Jason Johnson

Yes, Johnson may have a horrid 52-86 career records, but no one should discount the losing teams he pitched throughout his career... He has excellent control (only walked 49 in 210 innings) and had several quality starts...He's within his prime (just turned 32 during the offeason) and seems to get better as his career progresses... He could possibly be had for a 2-yr contract worth $8 mil....

You must be registered for see images attach

Joe Mays

Mays was forced out of Minnesota due to a numbers game... He can be a quality #3 in the Dbacks rotation, but he did struggle toward the end of last season...it mainly could be that he needed a change of scenery... He did go 17-13 in '01 and is still young enough to revert back to that form....

You must be registered for see images attach

Jamey Wright

It's awfully complex to know how truely good Wright is since he pitched the last cpl of season with the Rockies, however, he did manage a solid 2nd half last season.... He could come somewhat cheap, however, he does have some major control problems at times, but again... that can be mainly caused for annually pitching for atrocious teams.....

Out of those... the best would be Armas followed by Johnson... the other 2 would be respectable fillers, if nothing else.....
 

Ryanwb

ASFN IDOL
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
35,576
Reaction score
6
Location
Mesa
If I remember correctly the D'backs tried to aquire Armas in a trade about 2 or 3 seasons ago but he went down with an injury and talks ended.
 

Phill11

The Payphone Man
Joined
Sep 30, 2003
Posts
1,312
Reaction score
0
Location
Peoria, AZ
Ryanwb said:
If I remember correctly the D'backs tried to aquire Armas in a trade about 2 or 3 seasons ago but he went down with an injury and talks ended.

I remember that too, just not who was involved. I was very high on Armas Jr. back then and still think he would be a bargain if we signed him.
 

boondockdrunk

Resident Drunkard
Joined
Oct 9, 2003
Posts
1,582
Reaction score
40
Johnson is durable but tends to fade as the season progresses (ESPN links this to him being a diabetic).

I don't like Jamey Wright at all. When we played him he looked awful. I know you cannot judge a guy on a few games, even when he is pitching at Coors, but he just doesn't seem like a good sign at all. I would feel better bringing up one of our horrid pitching prospects over picking up this guy for more money.

Joe Mays had that one really good year and then has just been awful since. If Armas and Johnson are both off the board, then I would attempt to sign him.

I think Tony Armas is the best pick here.
 
OP
OP
The Commish

The Commish

youknowhatimsayin?
Joined
Jun 16, 2004
Posts
2,201
Reaction score
11
Location
San Francisco
Nothing really excites me here. It is good to see all of our young guys are considered untouchable. All hail Byrnes!
 

nathan

ASFN Lifer
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
4,891
Reaction score
4
Location
Alexandria, VA
Tony Armas was offered arbitration so he would cost a second round pick, but the Dbacks have an extra one because the Giants signed Worrell. Armas should be at least as good as Claudio Vargas.
 

overseascardfan

ASFN Addict
Joined
Apr 9, 2005
Posts
8,807
Reaction score
2,096
Location
Phoenix
I find it interesting that the D'backs have no interest in Washburn or Weaver, definately due to their salary demands and the overspending for Ortiz last year. Also interesting about their lack of interest in Benson.

So until deals are made our rotation looks like this so far:

Vazquez
Webb
Halsey
Ortiz
Vargas

What about Vazquez and Ortiz for Milledge, Humber, and Benson and trade Glaus for Clement and Lester? Sign Rincon and T. Jones.

Ortiz should get better playing in a pitcher friendly park and they get Vazquez to give them a pretty good rotation w/ Pedro and Zambrano.

Glaus gives them a young power hitter if they decide to trade Manny. Plus unloading Clement allows them to get into the Clemens sweepstakes.

After the trades our rotation would look like this:

Webb
Clement
Benson
Vargas
Halsey

Bullpen
Rincon
Valverde
Aquino
Jones
Bruney
 
Last edited:

nathan

ASFN Lifer
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
4,891
Reaction score
4
Location
Alexandria, VA
Why would the Mets want Ortiz. No way the Mets do that deal.

Todd Jones signed with the Tigers already.
 

HooverDam

Registered User
Joined
May 21, 2005
Posts
6,560
Reaction score
0
overseascardfan said:
Webb
Clement
Benson
Vargas
Halsey

I doubt it would happen, but thats not a bad looking rotation, but doesnt Benson also carry a big contract? I think the Dbacks front office is thinking: young, cheap, potential, etc.
 

devilfan02

Registered
Joined
Nov 12, 2005
Posts
3,399
Reaction score
0
Location
Scottsdale, AZ
overseascardfan said:
I find it interesting that the D'backs have no interest in Washburn or Weaver, definately due to their salary demands and the overspending for Ortiz last year. Also interesting about their lack of interest in Benson.

So until deals are made our rotation looks like this so far:

Vazquez
Webb
Halsey
Ortiz
Vargas

What about Vazquez and Ortiz for Milledge, Humber, and Benson and trade Glaus for Clement and Lester? Sign Rincon and T. Jones.

Ortiz should get better playing in a pitcher friendly park and they get Vazquez to give them a pretty good rotation w/ Pedro and Zambrano.

Glaus gives them a young power hitter if they decide to trade Manny. Plus unloading Clement allows them to get into the Clemens sweepstakes.

After the trades our rotation would look like this:

Webb
Clement
Benson
Vargas
Halsey

Bullpen
Rincon
Valverde
Aquino
Jones
Bruney

We have zero interesest in Benson because he's due 15 million over the next 2 years and he isnt good. Benson is the one holding up the trade- the Mets have to move him in order to take on Javy. Byrnes refuses to take Benson and for very good reason. We don't need any more bad pitchers eating up thin money (Ortiz). Neither Washburn nor Weaver will be cheap. They are not that good and will get attention from several teams, especially Weaver. They won't be worth the asking price. I woyuld love to get Milledge but I think he's a pipe dream. There is not 1 team in all of MLB that would take Russ Ortiz and his contract, not even teams like NYM, NYY, and Boston. Boston is looking to get rid of pitchers (in exception of Clemens) and Lester is untouchable as he is in their rotation next year. It has been reported that they would trade us Clement for Glaus which would be great for us. Todd Jones signed with Detroit last week. KLL submitted a good post on what kind of starters we're looking for- middle of the line starters who can be effective at a reasonable price. We need a couple guys who we can get relatively cheap that can give us decent results, kind of like Vargas last year. We'll probably go after Armas and/or Johnson to go along with whoever we get in the Javy trade. I'm not sure who their looking at in the bullpen but I know we need 1 or 2 left handed relievers, preferably veterans.
 
Last edited:

coyoteshockeyfan

Fool In The Rain
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2004
Posts
8,942
Reaction score
405
overseascardfan said:
What about Vazquez and Ortiz for Milledge, Humber, and Benson and trade Glaus for Clement and Lester? Sign Rincon and T. Jones.
Too bad the Mets would never, ever do that deal, and I doubt the Red Sox would do that either.
 

Kolo

Registered User
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Posts
3,820
Reaction score
0
This from Rotoworld via the New York Daily News:

Javier Vazquez could be dealt to the White Sox for either Jose Contreras or Jon Garland, a baseball insider told the New York Daily News.
A Vazquez deal is on the verge of going down. The Mets were still in it at last check. It's unclear whether the Nationals were able to put together anything to entice Diamondbacks GM Josh Byrnes. Dec. 13 - 4:41 am et
 

Phill11

The Payphone Man
Joined
Sep 30, 2003
Posts
1,312
Reaction score
0
Location
Peoria, AZ
I'd rather get someone cheaper than Jose, but he's OK.

Garland, I really like that trade if we get a few smaller prospects too.
 

KingLouieLouie

Going Old School!
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2003
Posts
5,532
Reaction score
46
Location
Phoenix, AZ
I overlooked someone, however, he isnt spectaculor, but I would rank over Wright and Mays...

You must be registered for see images attach

Scott Elarton

True, he's been erratic throughout most of his career, however, he's 29 and still can improve.... He did bounce back last season w/a decent year in Cleveland and had a rather impressive 103/48 K/BB ratio over 181.2 innings.... He's obviously not that remarkable, but could come at a relative cheap price and be a decent #4 or #5 in the rotation....

Although...I would much prefer Armas than anyone else that I have listed.. Johnson is very intriguing.....

Edit: However, the Dbacks must wait until the Vazquez trade is completed since they actually might save some money in the process and be then primed to consider Jeff Weaver..or if they can still work-out that separate trade for Matt Clement.... Rumor has it that Seattle was offering CF Jeremy Reed to Boston for Clement... I wonder how the Dbacks could counter... Once Manny is traded..that might elevate the Red Sox's interest in Glaus.....

Heck.. I wouldnt mind Jeremy Reed myself since he has soo much upside and speed that the Dbacks yearn for in CF.. but it would take a 3-team deal involving the Mariners (if Vazquez was involved in that package) since Seattle is included on Vazquez's "veto list" of 6 teams....

And.. those mid-low tier pitchers market price would somewhat coincide to a certain extent w/the higher tier pitchers.... As long as they dont sign someone like such as what they did w/Ortiz last yr to a lucrative long-term contract to someone who doesnt warrant it... or rely on a Shane Reynolds or Steve Sparks combo to fill-out the rotation..then I'm happy in that regard..
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
557,547
Posts
5,447,955
Members
6,335
Latest member
zbeaster
Top