Don't Wear Google Glass Inside A Movie Theater Or Homeland Security Will Show Up

Brian in Mesa

Advocatus Diaboli
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
72,735
Reaction score
24,316
Location
Killjoy Central
Don't Wear Google Glass Inside A Movie Theater Or Homeland Security Will Show Up

http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Don-...eater-Or-Homeland-Security-Show-Up-41250.html

If you see something, say something. That’s what the federal government wants you to do when it comes to possible terrorist activities, and that’s what the studios want theater owners to do when it comes to possible piracy activities. In theory, such proactive behavior can stop shady business in progress. In practice, however, it can lead to Department Of Homeland Security agents escorting an unfortunate Ohio resident out of a Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit screening for doing nothing more than wearing Google Glass.

Here’s a portion of the statement he later gave about the incident…
"I kept telling them that Glass has a USB port and not only did I allow them, I actually insist they connect to it and see that there was nothing but personal photos with my wife and my dog on it. I also insisted they look at my phone too and clear things out, but they wanted to talk first. They wanted to know who I am, where I live, where I work, how much I’m making, how many computers I have at home, why am I recording the movie, who am I going to give the recording to, why don’t I just give up the guy up the chain, ’cause they are not interested in me. Over and over and over again."

Eventually, someone came in with a computer and actually went through everything stored on the Google Glass and discovered there was nothing incriminating saved. The man explained he kept the glasses on because they were actually prescription, but the Google Glass portion of his bifocals were turned off during the film---because he hasn’t been, nor will he ever be a pirate. As an apology, the lead agent reportedly secured the man four free movie passes, but he wasn’t exactly in a forgiving mood and later took to the Internet to complain about everything that happened, even going so far as to say he "should sue" but won’t.
 
OP
OP
Brian in Mesa

Brian in Mesa

Advocatus Diaboli
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
72,735
Reaction score
24,316
Location
Killjoy Central
AMC movie theater calls “federal agents” to arrest a Google Glass user

http://the-gadgeteer.com/2014/01/20/amc-movie-theater-calls-fbi-to-arrest-a-google-glass-user/

A long time Gadgeteer reader contacted me today through Google Hangouts to tell me that he had a story that he thought I’d be interested in reading. He then forwarded me a long email with a story from a very good friend of his. It was such a surprising story that I asked if I could have permission to post it here on The Gadgeteer. I ended up communicating with the author of the story and have posted it here for everyone to read…

Story at link...
 

PDXChris

All In!
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 28, 2003
Posts
31,382
Reaction score
27,991
Location
Nowhere
They should arrest them for just wearing them for looking so ridiculous, but this is a good start.

But seriously, these are tiny PC's that have access to the internet, so I assume they could be used to record or even stream the movie. Based on that, I have no issue restricting them.
 

MigratingOsprey

Thank You Paul!
Joined
Jul 20, 2003
Posts
13,909
Reaction score
6,818
Location
Goodyear
They should arrest them for just wearing them for looking so ridiculous, but this is a good start.

But seriously, these are tiny PC's that have access to the internet, so I assume they could be used to record or even stream the movie. Based on that, I have no issue restricting them.

If a theater wanted to restrict them - then they should.

Except the theater didn't - they called in DHS who went on to hold and interogate this guy.

Not to mention that from my understanding it's noticeable when the system is "on" in a dark setting and that the built in camera is pretty much garbage, plus it's head mounted so the recorded image would pretty much bounce .... if you wanted to pirate a movie you could get better, easier to conceal, stable equipment for no more than it would cost to buy Glass

Then again, DHS is pretty much a flock of idiots so anything they do is not surprising
 

PDXChris

All In!
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 28, 2003
Posts
31,382
Reaction score
27,991
Location
Nowhere
If a theater wanted to restrict them - then they should.

Except the theater didn't - they called in DHS who went on to hold and interogate this guy.

Not to mention that from my understanding it's noticeable when the system is "on" in a dark setting and that the built in camera is pretty much garbage, plus it's head mounted so the recorded image would pretty much bounce .... if you wanted to pirate a movie you could get better, easier to conceal, stable equipment for no more than it would cost to buy Glass

Then again, DHS is pretty much a flock of idiots so anything they do is not surprising

Except most employees in a movie theater are kids and after the handful of shootings over the last few years, I would not surprise me that they are not allowed to confront customers. I have no issue with this.
 

MigratingOsprey

Thank You Paul!
Joined
Jul 20, 2003
Posts
13,909
Reaction score
6,818
Location
Goodyear
Except most employees in a movie theater are kids and after the handful of shootings over the last few years, I would not surprise me that they are not allowed to confront customers. I have no issue with this.

Get a manager.

If it's an issue he shouldn't have made it past the ticket taker

Fear of confrontation is no reason to not enforce a rule or regulation at your business. Also, they called DHS and not the regular police/security.

You also have no problem with DHS detaining someone for hours for essentially no reason?
 

PDXChris

All In!
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 28, 2003
Posts
31,382
Reaction score
27,991
Location
Nowhere
Get a manager.

If it's an issue he shouldn't have made it past the ticket taker

Fear of confrontation is no reason to not enforce a rule or regulation at your business. Also, they called DHS and not the regular police/security.

You also have no problem with DHS detaining someone for hours for essentially no reason?

Ummm, have you been to a theater. The theater I was at over the weekend had a teenage manger. But what ever, I will agree to disagree. You are not going to change my mind.
 

LVG

Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Moderator Emeritus
Joined
Oct 10, 2005
Posts
23,978
Reaction score
7,699
Location
Vegas, baby, yeah!
Get a manager.

If it's an issue he shouldn't have made it past the ticket taker

Fear of confrontation is no reason to not enforce a rule or regulation at your business. Also, they called DHS and not the regular police/security.

You also have no problem with DHS detaining someone for hours for essentially no reason?

I'm curious why it was DHS and not FBI. I thought FBI handled piracy cases.

Major strike against the agent for saying that he didn't have to show ID when asked.

I think DHS did have reason to detain to conduct an investigation. He had a recording device displayed prominently and piracy is a problem. That's reasonable suspicion. After investigation they released him.

However, I think what most people object to is how the agents acted - like this guy was a criminal before there is any proof, the intimidation tactics, and the blow off when it was all over.
 

PDXChris

All In!
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 28, 2003
Posts
31,382
Reaction score
27,991
Location
Nowhere
However, I think what most people object to is how the agents acted - like this guy was a criminal before there is any proof, the intimidation tactics, and the blow off when it was all over.

I agree with that part.
 
Top