xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Agreed. ESPN seems to be moving further away from journalism and more towards aggregation. It's definitely plagiarism adjace if not worse (IMO).This is effectively a reprint of the Athletic article from a month ago. Same people and commentary.
Kind of plagiaristic really
a few thoughts:
Basically the story is that Mike is a total jerk.
I suspect there is context for why the team is uptight about keeping female employees away from coaches and players. Not saying its justified, but this doesn't happen randomly.
Weirdest / most disturbing anecdote: Mike yelling at a line manager **for asking** if sick time can be used for jury duty. That is such a low stakes, day to day kind of question that should have been dispatched without the team owner getting involved. His reaction is so out of proportion to the issue.
and ... Mike B alienating people in the local community is consistent with what i have seen.
This is effectively a reprint of the Athletic article from a month ago. Same people and commentary.
Kind of plagiaristic really
Yeah. This was crazy. Michael not only yelled at her, they suspended her two days without pay for bringing up the issue at all. Then it seems like they had her write a form email saying it was her fault for essentially overreacting to the situation that they can use whenever anyone asks.
Just wild, awful stuff.
That's only true if you only read the headline. There are tons of new details in here, even if there aren't actions described from within the past 12-18 months.
okayI read the article and found it be strikingly similar, especially with the people that are on record.
I picked out a few new details, but there is a lot of stuff that is the same.Yeah. This was crazy. Michael not only yelled at her, they suspended her two days without pay for bringing up the issue at all. Then it seems like they had her write a form email saying it was her fault for essentially overreacting to the situation that they can use whenever anyone asks.
Just wild, awful stuff.
That's only true if you only read the headline. There are tons of new details in here, even if there aren't actions described from within the past 12-18 months.
Yeah. It's 85% stuff that we've heard before (and we're in the 1% of fans, so we keep close tabs on this, even it most of it will be new to casual fans of the team), but the 15% is still pretty brutal:I picked out a few new details, but there is a lot of stuff that is the same.