Final Season for ‘At the Movies’

Brian in Mesa

Advocatus Diaboli
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
72,629
Reaction score
24,099
Location
Killjoy Central
Final Season for ‘At the Movies’

By DAVE ITZKOFF
March 25, 2010


The balcony is closed, this time for good. After nearly three decades, “At the Movies,” the syndicated television program that introduced many viewers to the film critics Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert, as well as to film criticism in all its thorny and contentious glory, will cease production this summer.

Disney-ABC Domestic Television, which distributes “At the Movies,” and ABC Media Productions, which produces it, said in a statement late Wednesday that the current version of the show, which is hosted by Michael Phillips of The Chicago Tribune and A. O. Scott of The New York Times, would broadcast its last original episode the weekend of Aug. 14.

The demise of “At the Movies” was a blow to the legions of armchair reviewers it spawned in its many incarnations, some of whom went on to professional careers in criticism. “It’s impossible to overestimate the impact of what Gene and Roger did,” Mr. Scott, the co-chief film critic at The Times, said in a telephone interview. “Any one of us who’s doing this now, on any platform or in any medium, is following them.”

But the program’s cancellation is also a reflection of the rapid changes that the film and television industries have undergone in recent years — the proliferation of print and Web outlets that offer movie reviews as much as the declining value of “At the Movies” in Disney’s syndication portfolio.

“From a business perspective,” Disney said in its statement, “it became clear this weekly, half-hour, broadcast syndication series was no longer sustainable.”

Read more at: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/26/arts/television/26cancel.html
 

Dr. Jones

Has No Time For Love
Joined
Nov 2, 2004
Posts
27,231
Reaction score
16,148
Dude.... This is one of the last Non-HD shows I still Tivo.

I think it's horrible that they are canceling this.

Can anyone give me another show like this that I can DVR going forward?
 

Mulli

...
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2004
Posts
52,529
Reaction score
4,601
Location
Generational
I was always more of a Siskel guy. Ebert is okay, but Roeper was boring.

To me, seeing or reading a review before I see the movie gives away too much.
 

Dr. Jones

Has No Time For Love
Joined
Nov 2, 2004
Posts
27,231
Reaction score
16,148
I was always more of a Siskel guy. Ebert is okay, but Roeper was boring.

To me, seeing or reading a review before I see the movie gives away too much.

I really liked Roeper.... But Phillips and Scott are very good together.

Plus, they always did "Top 10" lists or Oscar favorites... I will miss this.

It also helped me find the little gems that I wouldn't have watched otherwise.
 

Renz

An Army of One
Joined
May 10, 2003
Posts
13,078
Reaction score
2
Location
lat: 35.231 lon: -111.550
Man, back in the day Siskel & Ebert were THE movie guys. Before the web and satellite TV etc. they were one of the only ways to find movie reviews.

Great show, but without the iconic Ebert I suppose its cancellation was inevitable what with sites like Rotten Tomatoes and all the media we have now. Definitely the end of an era.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
46,396
Reaction score
16,898
Location
Round Rock, TX
Dude.... This is one of the last Non-HD shows I still Tivo.

I think it's horrible that they are canceling this.

Can anyone give me another show like this that I can DVR going forward?

There's a cable channel called "REEL" that seems to have review shows like this on all the time, one of which I believe has Leonard Maltin.
 

Dr. Jones

Has No Time For Love
Joined
Nov 2, 2004
Posts
27,231
Reaction score
16,148
There's a cable channel called "REEL" that seems to have review shows like this on all the time, one of which I believe has Leonard Maltin.

Thanks Chap,

The reels (reelz?) channel is currently where I tape At the Movies. I will look around for LM's show.
 

Gaddabout

Plucky Comic Relief
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2004
Posts
16,043
Reaction score
11
Location
Gilbert
Siskel would occasionally say something I would have to write down, but Ebert was always my role model for how to view movies. I didn't agree with every critique, but his understanding of the stage and context definitely opened up a whole new way to watch movies for me. I should say, Ebert helped me better enjoy movies. I started to understand, for example, what foreign films were attempting -- it wasn't just a cultural gap ... they are still more influenced by the earliest films, when film was considered an art form. And Ebert helped me understand attempting art doesn't make a movie more important or better than a summer Hollywood blockbuster. It just makes it different.

Some Siskelisms (grossly paraphrased due to my poor memory):

- Whenever I come across these types of movies (referring to movies with heavy dialogue and a still camera), I have to ask myself if these characters are more interesting than the same actors having lunch.

- If the average movie goer is so aware of the camera angle they comment to the person next to them, the director has failed. I can't think of a successful movie in history in which the masses rave about the camera angles.

- Tell the story. The only people impressed with how you can move the camera in strange ways are cinematographers.

- It's not important that you agree with me (IIRC, he was talking to Johnny Carson). That's not the point. It is important that you believe that I believe what I'm saying.

- (When asked if he enjoys negative criticism) I'd much rather discuss a movie I enjoyed. I just want to see a movie with characters as interesting as the people I know in real life.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
552,941
Posts
5,404,121
Members
6,315
Latest member
SewingChick65
Top