Frat Boys Sue "Borat"

Jersey Girl

Stand down
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2002
Posts
32,590
Reaction score
6,709
Location
Super Scottsdale
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061110/ap_on_en_mo/film_borat_lawsuit

SANTA MONICA, Calif. - Two fraternity boys want to make lawsuit against "Borat" over their drunken appearance in the hit movie.

The legal action filed Thursday on their behalf claims they were duped into appearing in the spoof documentary "Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan," in which they made racist and sexist comments on camera.

The young men "engaged in behavior that they otherwise would not have engaged in," the lawsuit says.

"Borat" follows the adventures of comedian Sacha Baron Cohen's Kazakh journalist character in a blend of fiction and improvised comic encounters as he travels across the United States and mocks Americans.

The plaintiffs were not named in the lawsuit "to protect themselves from any additional and unnecessary embarrassment." They were identified in the movie as fraternity members from a South Carolina university, and appeared drunk as they made insulting comments about women and minorities to Cohen's character.

The lawsuit claims that in October 2005, a production crew took the students to a bar to drink and "loosen up" before participating in what they were told would be a documentary to be shown outside of the United States.

"They were induced to agree to participate and were told the name of the fraternity and the name of their school wouldn't be used," said the plaintiffs' attorney, Olivier Taillieu. "They were put into an RV and were made to believe they were picking up Borat the hitchhiker."

After a bout of heavy drinking, the plaintiffs signed a release form they were told "had something to do with reliability issues with being in the RV," Taillieu said.

The film "made plaintiffs the object of ridicule, humiliation, mental anguish and emotional and physical distress, loss of reputation, goodwill and standing in the community," the lawsuit said.

It names 20th Century Fox, a unit of News Corp., and three production companies as defendants.

Studio spokesman Gregg Brilliant said the lawsuit "has no merit."

The plaintiffs were seeking an injunction to stop the studio from displaying their image and likeness, along with unspecified monetary damages.

"Borat" debuted as the top movie last weekend with $26.5 million.



Um, here's an idea. Don't get hammered and say stupid things on camera. Morons. I hope they get nothing.
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,420
Reaction score
12,164
Um, here's an idea. Don't get hammered and say stupid things on camera. Morons. I hope they get nothing.

...and furthermore have to pay the legal costs for the defendants.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
46,640
Reaction score
17,277
Location
Round Rock, TX
Doesn't matter if the studio thinks the lawsuit has no merit. Guaranteed this will be settled out of court and there will be a large sum of money changing hands.
 
OP
OP
Jersey Girl

Jersey Girl

Stand down
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2002
Posts
32,590
Reaction score
6,709
Location
Super Scottsdale
Doesn't matter if the studio thinks the lawsuit has no merit. Guaranteed this will be settled out of court and there will be a large sum of money changing hands.

Lawsuits like this tick me off. So, because these dorks are embarrassed by their actions, they're gonna get rewarded with a large sum of money? What ever happened to being accountable for yourself and your actions?

Ridiculous.
 

Absolute Zero

ASFN Icon
Joined
Aug 9, 2005
Posts
17,736
Reaction score
9,205
http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/story?id=2644436&page=1

No doubt these guys were largely just being themselves and should be ashamed of themselves.

Problem is though that it appears that Cohen's guys got them drunk and then egged them on to act like jerk frat boys under false pretenses. So if they have suffered any kind of embarrasment or humiliation, the lawsuit is legit. Its called fraud, even though these guys would probably not get much sypathy from a jury.
 

Espo

Lets Go Suns
Joined
Oct 18, 2003
Posts
1,664
Reaction score
0
Location
Chandler
Lawsuits like this tick me off. So, because these dorks are embarrassed by their actions, they're gonna get rewarded with a large sum of money? What ever happened to being accountable for yourself and your actions?

Ridiculous.
I completely agree with that. I mean these idiots probably act like that every weekend and it just doesn't happen to be on film. If they signed a release whether drunk or not doesn't seem to matter because I believe thats how the Girls Gone Wild guy gets away with what he does. These guys just need to put down the beer and think about what they hell they are doing before they open their mouths.
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,420
Reaction score
12,164
Well, I dated a frat guy for 3 1/2 years in college and neither he nor his buddies every needed any egging on for being jerks.

But I digress.

The false pretense thing might come back to bite them, but still. It's your behavior. You were drunk. You said what you said. These jackasses can sue for millions, but Mel Gibson gets raked over the coals?

Geesh. Send these boys to AA and sensitivity training. Don't pay them a dime.

As I stated in the "did you know" thread. Mel Gibson made over $400 million on the Passion of Christ movie alone. I really don't think he cares that much if he is "raked over the coals"
 
OP
OP
Jersey Girl

Jersey Girl

Stand down
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2002
Posts
32,590
Reaction score
6,709
Location
Super Scottsdale
As I stated in the "did you know" thread. Mel Gibson made over $400 million on the Passion of Christ movie alone. I really don't think he cares that much if he is "raked over the coals"

Oh, I think that he does. How could someone NOT care about that, especially if you are someone whose livelihood depends on whether or not people "like" you?

But my point wasn't to get into a Mel Gibson debate here. My point is you should not be able to seek reward for doing something stupid.
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,420
Reaction score
12,164
Oh, I think that he does. How could someone NOT care about that, especially if you are someone whose livelihood depends on whether or not people "like" you?

But my point wasn't to get into a Mel Gibson debate here. My point is you should not be able to seek reward for doing something stupid.

I guess my point is that I don't think that he was raked over the coals all that much. His career could certainly rebound. I liken it to Tom Cruise right now. He is still an attraction, but his whole scientology thing has turned people off.
 
OP
OP
Jersey Girl

Jersey Girl

Stand down
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2002
Posts
32,590
Reaction score
6,709
Location
Super Scottsdale
I guess my point is that I don't think that he was raked over the coals all that much. His career could certainly rebound. I liken it to Tom Cruise right now. He is still an attraction, but his whole scientology thing has turned people off.

10-4.
 
Top