I like belt and think they should both be in the lineup
it's a risk you take with being a C though and posey was definitely blocking the plate and should be expecting to get hit there ... there was going to be contact no matter what on that play
I can't get it to cut and paste in but there's a video from the mercury news website that if you freeze it you can see Posey is between the mound and home plate, directly in front not to the left or the right. So he's only blocking the plate if the runner comes from the mound. From 3rd base his foot is not even covering the plate. The runner is just starting to enter the circle and is still on the baseline. When the actual collision happens the runner is now inside the baseline and Posey has turned and is moving to his left towards the baseline but he's still not in the direct path from 3rd to homeplate.
http://www.mercurynews.com/giants/ci_18151673?nclick_check=1
The video is in the middle you can stop and start it and see what I'm talking about.
I don't think it was dirty but I also don't think Posey was blocking the plate. The runner has admitted he tried to dislodge the ball because he knew it was beating him. It was just one of those fluke things usually the catcher doesn't end up seriously injured.
I don't agree with Posey's agent but then I think many catchers have now essentially said they felt Posey wasn't blocking the plate and wasn't at fault.
One was Ray Fosse the guy Pete Rose trucked and wrecked his career, he's local too so probably biased but he said this.
Added Fosse: "I know guys looked at it and said it's a clean play, but a catcher is always taught to give the runner part of the plate, and once he has part of the plate, you expect him to slide to that part of the plate. It looked like the runner went after him."
It is just one of those plays that because Posey got so famous in the postseason last year, people are making a big deal out of his injury now.
I don't think anybody thinks the guy tried to injure him, just that he tried to jar the ball loose.
I've always felt if they needed a rule it should be catcher can't block the plate without the ball, and runner has to be within reach of the plate. I think he was in this case even though he went inside.