good times for L.A. haters

scotsman13

Registered User
Joined
Oct 21, 2002
Posts
1,418
Reaction score
0
Location
salt lake city
I hate L.A. ... and it's been a good couple months
Story Tools: Print Email
Kevin Hench / Special to FOXSports.com
Posted: 45 minutes ago



Okay, enough already. I'm actually starting to feel guilty for the giddy glee with which I've enjoyed the demise and dismantling of the Los Angeles Lakers. I'm losing my appetite for destruction.

Who am I kidding, this just keeps getting better and better. If you hate the Lakers like I hate the Lakers, this has been the Summer of Love.

It was a happy day when Shaquille O'Neal joined the Miami Heat. (Wilfredo Lee / AP)


I loved it that the Lakers arrogantly assumed the crown was theirs after they beat the Spurs. I loved it when the Pistons turned the Lakers into humiliated submissives, unable to do anything without Detroit's permission. I loved it when Shaq gave his Armageddon presser after Game 5 and made it clear that the best interior player in the game and the best perimeter player in the game would never play together again. I loved it when Phil Jackson's soft smile in his press conference said, "Thank God I'll never again have to try to rein in these two egos like a guy trying to tether two Goodyear blimps with one rope."

And on and on it's gone. Each headline adding to the unbridled joy of seeing a nemesis undone. Even the one Laker everyone likes — D-Fish — bolted.

The Germans have a word for taking joy in other people's misery: schadenfreude. (We have a term of endearment in the Bay State for people who take delight in others' suffering: it begins with "Mass" and it ends in "hole.") For years I've been afflicted with a specific form of schadenfreude, I call it Shaqenfreude. Yes, since 1996, I've lived for those rare moments when the Diesel has run out of fuel and the Lakers have failed miserably.

It was very hard to truly hate the '80s Lakers, but that's what makes Boston sports fans so special: we can step up and bring the hate even when the targets are clearly good guys — Magic, Worthy, Bernie Williams, Jeter, et al. But these latest Lakers were perhaps the most unlikable assemblage in sports history. Felony charges aside, these guys never met an interview they couldn't mumble their way through, clearly contemptuous of the media types who dedicate their lives to publicizing the players' product and thereby helping to line the players' pockets. And nothing upsets me more than a guy — or, in this case, two guys — trying to collect their ring on the backs of others. Think Wade Boggs riding on that mounted policeman's horse after the 1996 World Series. Yuck. So the Toxic Twins were joined by the Glove and the Mailman to form the crankiest quartet since the Sex Pistols.

So you see, for me, this last two months has been one long delirious fit of ecstasy.

May 13 — The day the clock stood still. Yes, Derek Fisher was able to catch, turn, rise and release in four-tenths of a second. Oy. That was that, the next month would just be a formality. But a funny thing happened on the way to the "Can you dig it?" orgy of self-congratulations that has become a Laker victory celebration.

June 6, 2004 — Before the most undeserving, entitled fans in the NBA, the Lakers got smacked in the mouth in Game 1 of the Finals, 87-75. Lakers fans are spoiled Philistines, reclining into their cushions, demanding to be fed grapes before they'll utter a decibel of approval (look for the worst fans in sports column, coming soon). Still, despite the Game 1 loss, everyone assumed we'd see a repeat of the '01 Finals against the Sixers when the Lakers blew off the first game and then swept the next four.

June 8 — And, sure enough, Larry Brown chose not to foul with a three-point lead in the waning seconds (are Bill Walton and I the only people in the world who understand that a guy has a much better chance of making a 3-pointer than of making a free throw, missing the second and having his team convert the putback?) and the series was tied.

June 10 — Pistons 88, Lakers 68. This is where I allowed myself to begin to dream, to hope. Maybe, just maybe this collection of surly, self-centered, me-guys could lose to a bunch of selfless we-guys.

June 13 — Pistons 88, Lakers 80. Even when it seemed obvious that the Lakers were dead after falling behind 3-1, I still had that Glenn Close in the bathtub feeling. Let's just make sure the monster is dead.

June 15 — Pistons 100, Lakers 87. Could it get any better than the Lakers being embarrassed in five games? Yup. Like the Fall of the House of Usher (the Raven guy, not the rapper guy), the Laker fortress began to crumble in front of our eyes at the postgame press conference. Shaq and Phil as much as said, "Don't let the door hit you in the face on our way out." It was like Christmas in June. Every answer a new present. This was sheer joy, a harbinger of the purge to come.

June 18 — It's official, the Phil is gone. Perhaps the hyper-literate Jackson had read Theodore Dreiser's An American Tragedy and knows the dangers of sleeping with the boss' daughter. I've never read it, but I did see the movie with Monty Clift and Elizabeth Taylor (A Place in the Sun) and I think Phil is doing the right thing by fleeing to the ranch in Montana. Somehow I doubt Jeanie will follow him. Anyway, the last time Phil was associated with a loss as lopsided as his Finals farewell was when he supported Bill Bradley in the 2000 Democratic primaries.

Late June-early July — The once unthinkable is happening: the Lakers are actively shopping Shaq. Why? One story gurgling its way through the rumor mill has it that Dr. Buss asked Kobe what it would take to re-sign him and Bryant said, "Make it my team." The open secret was that Shaq wanted to get paid and the Lakers were skittish about shelling out for the extension it would take to make those big ol' bones happy. But moving Shaq was gonna be about as easy as turning around an aircraft carrier at your local marina. As days and weeks went by without a clear destination emerging I started to worry that Shaq and Kobe would do one of their semi-annual kiss-and-make-ups and I'd have to start dreading another Laker run to glory. But then came the great news: Shaq was heading to Miami.

July 14 — What could be better than Shaq being driven out of Tinseltown? How about Lamar Odom returning to the site of his last drug suspension and the Lakers being saddled with Brian Grant's woeful contract? Hey, the Lakers were stuck. There was no way they were going to get market value for the Big Aristotle. Mitch Kupchak probably did as well as he could. But the bottom line is the Lakers are not a legitimate title threat next year. Woo-hoo!

July 15 — Derek Fisher signs with the Warriors. The cherry on the Laker-hatin' sundae.

July 20 — When the Daddy pulled his Diesel-powered truck into Miami this past Tuesday it capped the most spectacular six-week period of Laker Hating in history.

The sheer euphoria of watching the Lakers unravel has been so consuming that it has actually taken my mind off how bad the Celtics are.
 

Tank

Wifi Guru
Joined
Oct 22, 2002
Posts
329
Reaction score
0
Location
Texas
scotsman13 said:
now if you really want to cap this off as a laker hater wait for the kobe conviction. the kobe defense team was given a blow today with the judge ruling that the exam of kobe can be used in the trail. http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/07/23/bryant.case/index.html

Actually if you read the article, its not a blow to the defence, because they were the ones who wanted it admitted.

Ruckriegle said the results of the examination could be used in the trial, as the prosecution had wanted, because the defense filed notice it would introduce the evidence.

Must not be anything too bad if the defence wanted the evidence introduced.
 

Brian in Mesa

Advocatus Diaboli
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
73,492
Reaction score
25,671
Location
Killjoy Central
Kevin Hench said:
The sheer euphoria of watching the Lakers unravel has been so consuming that it has actually taken my mind off how bad the Celtics are.

Woohoo!! Celtics Suck!!

:fans::fans:
 

devilalum

Heavily Redacted
Joined
Jul 30, 2002
Posts
16,776
Reaction score
3,187
I find it hard to believe that Stern will allow the Lakers, Knicks, Celtics and Bulls to all stink for very long.

In the next 2 years one of these teams (see Lakers) will work out some unbelievable deal for Garnett or Duncan or maybe even Amare and be right back on top.

It's all about money!
 

thegrahamcrackr

Registered User
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Posts
6,168
Reaction score
0
Location
Scottsdale, Az
devilalum said:
I find it hard to believe that Stern will allow the Lakers, Knicks, Celtics and Bulls to all stink for very long.

In the next 2 years one of these teams (see Lakers) will work out some unbelievable deal for Garnett or Duncan or maybe even Amare and be right back on top.

It's all about money!


You will never put the conspiracy theories to rest will you?
 

George O'Brien

ASFN Icon
Joined
Nov 22, 2003
Posts
10,297
Reaction score
0
Location
Sun City
devilalum said:
I find it hard to believe that Stern will allow the Lakers, Knicks, Celtics and Bulls to all stink for very long.

In the next 2 years one of these teams (see Lakers) will work out some unbelievable deal for Garnett or Duncan or maybe even Amare and be right back on top.

It's all about money!

So you believe Stern is going to force the Celtics to fire Ainge? :D

It is odd that the biggest super stars are now in small markets: Shaq in Miami, Duncan in San Antonio, Garnett in Minnesota, J O'Neal in Indiana, Yao and T-Mac in Houston, Ray Allen in Seattle, etc. Kobe in LA is the only elite player left in the top three markets (no I don't think Marbury is an elite player).

Realistically, the NBA rules are designed to minimize free agent movement by elite players. Unless the rules are changed in the next player contract, I don't see that changing no matter how much Stern would like to see strong teams in the major markets.
 

cepstrum

Shqiptar i Qart
Joined
Jun 20, 2004
Posts
609
Reaction score
0
Location
Tempe
George O'Brien said:
Realistically, the NBA rules are designed to minimize free agent movement by elite players. Unless the rules are changed in the next player contract, I don't see that changing no matter how much Stern would like to see strong teams in the major markets.
I agree. A big reason for the rules is so that the small market teams can prosper also. I dont think Stern is worried about big market teams without superstars. That will change quickly.
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,599
Reaction score
9,918
Location
L.A. area
I really hope ratings are up this coming season (assuming the season takes place at all). Most serious observers of the league believe that this is going to be one of the most exciting seasons in many years, because there are several potential title contenders and several more who could be close with just one or two lucky breaks. Relative parity should be good news for everyone.

But if the ratings stink, it will undermine any push to keep the playing field level (or, heaven forbid, make it more level than it already is). The fans will have said that they'd rather see a few superstar-laden, "dominant" teams than a genuine battle amongs lots of good clubs. I know that I'll be watching with more interest next year, but will I be in the majority? A lot of the league's future could depend on what statement this year's fans make.

Come on, fans, do the right thing!
 

Renz

An Army of One
Joined
May 10, 2003
Posts
13,078
Reaction score
2
Location
lat: 35.231 lon: -111.550
scotsman13 said:
now if you really want to cap this off as a laker hater wait for the kobe conviction.
No way will Kobe be convicted.

Judge will allow accuser's sex life as evidence in Kobe Bryant case

By JON SARCHE, Associated Press Writer

July 23, 2004

DENVER (AP) -- In a huge victory for Kobe Bryant's defense, the judge in the NBA star's sexual assault case ruled Friday that his accuser's sex life during the week of their encounter can be used against her at trial.

District Judge Terry Ruckriegle said details of the woman's sexual activities in the three days before her July 1, 2003, hospital examination are relevant to help determine the cause of her injuries and the source of DNA evidence. He also said the credibility of the accuser was a factor.

One legal expert called the decision a stunning defeat for prosecutors that could derail their entire case.

``This evidence is as damaging a set of facts as a prosecutor could ever have to contend with and one wonders if at long last the accuser will pull the plug on this case,'' said Larry Pozner, former president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.

Prosecutors will decide how to proceed after reviewing the decision and no options have been ruled out, prosecution spokeswoman Krista Flannigan said.

``We have no plans of not moving forward with the prosecution,'' she said. ``It's just, what is that going to look like?''

The woman's attorney, John Clune, declined to comment and defense attorneys didn't return a call.

The defense's bid to question the accuser's credibility by bringing up her sex life was considered one of the most important pieces of Bryant's upcoming trial.

The defense has suggested the woman had multiple sexual partners in the days surrounding her June 2003 encounter with Bryant, including sex with someone after the alleged attack and before she contacted the authorities. Her attorney has vehemently denied that claim. The defense contends injuries found on her during an exam at a hospital could have been caused by someone other than Bryant.

The judge ruled that Colorado's strict rape-shield law, which generally prevents the sex life of an alleged assault victim from being admitted as evidence, does not apply to all the information Bryant's lawyers want to introduce.

He said he was convinced by the defense that ``specific instances of sexual activity'' and evidence of sex can be offered to bolster their contention that her injuries were not caused by Bryant.

Ruckriegle agreed that the woman's sex life in the 72 hours before the exam was relevant, but barred ``any and all other evidence'' related to her conduct.

Bryant faces an Aug. 27 trial on a single charge of felony sexual assault. He has pleaded not guilty, saying he had consensual sex last summer with the woman, then a 19-year-old front desk worker at a Vail-area resort.

If convicted, the Los Angeles Lakers star faces four years to life in prison or 20 years to life on probation.

Cynthia Stone, executive director of the Colorado Coalition Against Sexual Assault, said the ruling was discouraging but said the final decision will be up to jurors.

``This stuff is going to be put in front of the jury along with all the other evidence -- it's just a small piece of that,'' she said. ``The ultimate question the jury has to answer is whether Kobe Bryant forced this woman to have sex against her will.''

Prosecutors could ask the state Supreme Court to review the decision, said Norm Early, a former Denver district attorney familiar with the case. But he said such a request could suggest the prosecution believes the ruling harms their case.

The prosecution can still use evidence that includes Bryant's statements to investigators and a T-shirt stained with the woman's blood. Early said that to prove its theory, the defense would still have to explain why the woman would have had sex with Bryant after being injured by consensual sex beforehand.

In a separate development, attorneys for the judge said they had asked U.S. Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer to uphold his order barring media organizations from releasing details from a closed-door hearing that were mistakenly e-mailed by a court reporter.

The judge's order, which was upheld this week by the Colorado Supreme Court, threatens The Associated Press and six other news organizations with contempt of court if they publish material from last month's hearing on the woman's sex life and other issues.

The media groups contend the order is an unconstitutional prior restraint of a free press. But the Colorado attorney general's office, representing Ruckriegle, said publication could torpedo the trial.

Updated on Friday, Jul 23, 2004 9:21 pm EDT
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
558,081
Posts
5,452,384
Members
6,336
Latest member
FKUCZK15
Top