Lefty
ASFN Icon
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2002
- Posts
- 12,573
- Reaction score
- 973
Houston had a horrible start to the season but they have been on fired of late and are now playing 500 baseball. They are back in the wild card race.
Zona90 said:Houston had a horrible start to the season but they have been on fired of late and are now playing 500 baseball. They are back in the wild card race.
ajcardfan said:Oakland has pulled off a similar turn around in the American League. From 15 games under back to .500. You look at the A's talent and it seems like the DBacks could put together a nice run at some point too.
Zona90 said:I know the A's are hot but because the Diamondbacks play in the NL, as do the Astros, I thought I would mention how hot Houston is playing.
First I don't agree that the A's are noticeably less talented than the DBacks, but I do think both teams are only capable of one big run and the D-Backs had theirs to begin the season while the A's are in the midst of theirs right now.ajcardfan said:Oakland has pulled off a similar turn around in the American League. From 15 games under back to .500. You look at the A's talent and it seems like the DBacks could put together a nice run at some point too.
MaoTosiFanClub said:And the Stros have two #1's on their staff, an above average #2, and a bullpen that leads the majors in K's per inning. Teams with that kind of pitching are much more likely to go on big runs than offensive-minded teams with average pitching like the DBacks.
The reason I said the A's are more talented than the D-Backs is because a young team like that is more likely to get better as the year goes on while a team stacked with injury-prone vets on the downside of their careers. Plus the only area in which we are better than the A's right now is in power numbers. They have a higher team batting average, get on-base more, have the much superior bullpen, the more talented staff and catch the ball better (especially in the outfield) all while having a greater record than us in a better division and league.ajcardfan said:That's why I brought up the A's. I think the Astros are better than both the DBacks and the A's because of that pitching. I guess April could count as the DBacks' run, but I don't remember them getting ten games over .500 for a stretch of 20 games or so. If Haren and Blanton keep it up, then I think the A's have a better staff than the DBacks. I don't think their hitters are really much to talk about though. Chavez and Kotsay are the only two to cause any concern at all.
MaoTosiFanClub said:The reason I said the A's are more talented than the D-Backs is because a young team like that is more likely to get better as the year goes on while a team stacked with injury-prone vets on the downside of their careers. Plus the only area in which we are better than the A's right now is in power numbers. They have a higher team batting average, get on-base more, have the much superior bullpen, the more talented staff and catch the ball better (especially in the outfield) all while having a greater record than us in a better division and league.