I think they will. Especially if the team is confident in how Kugler is developing OL. I will have to rewatch the 49ers game, but I think Cole did pretty well. If that is the case, they may choose to move Pugh to RT moving forward using Murray's injury as an excuse. That would move us into the offseason with the following line...
LT-Humphries
LG-Cole
C-Shipley/Gaillard
RG-Sweezy
RT-Pugh/Murray
It is a ton better in terms of contract/position allocation, and you still have the ability to draft and develop. You could draft a RG and/or RT early and it isn't an issue. You still have versatility along the line. You can draft a C in round 1 if Gaillard doesn't develop as hoped. You have depth if players get hurt.
This is all speculation, but fits if you read the quotes from Kugler in the offseason and look at which players have been kept throughout the roster process. Keeping Shipley means something. and keeping Gaillard does as well. Generally, your backup C is not your swing lineman.
Two highest PFF* rated OL against 49ers - Cole and Pugh
Who would've thought?
they are stuck with Reddick next year -- per Overthecap: he will count $4.5mm-ish against the cap -- no matter what happens: keep, cut, trade -- either pre-June 1 or post. (I don't really understand it, but that's what it says FWIW)
so maybe 3 years of NFL experience, plus 15 lbs in the offseason, and maybe he can be a top 4 OLB on the roster.
wo highest PFF* rated OL against 49ers - Cole and Pugh
He can be extended, playing guard is not rb, can still be good till 35I don't think we extend him or re-sign him in 2021.
I do think he probably is our starter next year depending on what FAs are available.
I don't believe Sweezy would prevent the Cardinals from drafting a RG in the upcoming draft.
I don't think we extend him or re-sign him in 2021.
I do think he probably is our starter next year depending on what FAs are available.
I don't believe Sweezy would prevent the Cardinals from drafting a RG in the upcoming draft.
It's not that he can't be ok, but I am not sure if Sweezy is what you want moving forward. My thought is that we should want to better on the o line than guys who can "get by".He can be extended, playing guard is not rb, can still be good till 35
That is why I think we would be ok drafting an OG high in this draft but wouldn't feel forced to cut Sweezy. Hell, if a rookie we draft in the 2nd round beats out Sweezy, those are good problems to have.I agree with all of your statements, but I think he should be penciled in as a starter. He's a solid starting RG.
I'd love for the team to replace him, he's really a limited starter who is good fighting in a phone booth and little else.
That is why I think we would be ok drafting an OG high in this draft but wouldn't feel forced to cut Sweezy. Hell, if a rookie we draft in the 2nd round beats out Sweezy, those are good problems to have.