If Logan Thomas isn't good enough to start under these circumstances ....

Should we start Logan Thomas on Sunday

  • Yes, gives us at least a shot to win

    Votes: 6 27.3%
  • No, Coach must know he isn't worth it

    Votes: 16 72.7%

  • Total voters
    22
  • Poll closed .

SissyBoyFloyd

Pawnee, Skidi Clan
Joined
Feb 1, 2012
Posts
5,077
Reaction score
2,384
Location
Mesa, AZ
then why have him on the team. Just think about it. Why would you prefer to lose with Lindley, than give Thomas a chance to show what he might be able to do? To me it is like throwing in the towel. If Thomas is THAT BAD, why keep paying him to sit on the bench? Did we draft him only to run the projector in the film room?
 

PJ1

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 21, 2002
Posts
12,268
Reaction score
5,424
Location
Nashville TN.
Long term project I guess. Don't believe they ever planned on using him this year.
 

juza76

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 5, 2009
Posts
13,808
Reaction score
9,628
Location
milan-italy
Long term project I guess. Don't believe they ever planned on using him this year.

but he will occupy a roster spot next years,limited chances he will turn in a good qb
wasted pick
 

GiantCardFan

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 15, 2014
Posts
1,157
Reaction score
1
Location
San Tan Valley
Thomas was drafted as a project. If you saw him in college you saw he was not ready to start in the Pro's. Obviously, he hasn't progressed enough this year to step in either. Someone thought he was worth picking. If they stuck him on the PS he could get claimed by another team. So they have no choice but to keep him on the 53
 

juza76

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 5, 2009
Posts
13,808
Reaction score
9,628
Location
milan-italy
You may very well be right. Just giving you what I believe the teams plans are for him.

but is not worth even to be the third qb on the roster,he is completly useless
they could sign this matthews long before,and probably he could give us more chances.
ok rarely u lose 2 qbs but in this case we are throwing down the toilet our chance to make some noize in the playoff
 
Last edited:

sunsfan88

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Posts
11,660
Reaction score
844
Cardinals should have drafted Derek Carr.
 

oaken1

Stone Cold
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
18,458
Reaction score
16,692
Location
Modesto, California
starting Lindley is not a testament to how bad LT is.... it is just the coach trying to get a little more live fire experience for the one QB who knows the entire playbook....hoping that will give us the best chance to win in the playoffs.

IMO...he should start LT from here on out anyway...even with a limited playbook....the only thing Lindley has that LT does not...is a losing mindset....but LT has wheels, which Lindley really doesn't.... I would start LT just to see if he has "IT"....some dudes just go in a zone when the pressure is on and find a way to win....we know Lindley does not have it...maybe LT does....I mean hell,...Tim Tebow was a horrible QB for three and a half quarters...then went all pro for the last ten minutes of the game and led the Broncs to the playoffs...maybe LT at least has some of that??...will never know with him riding the pine.
The only thing Lindley has,...is he knows the playbook....I am pretty sure Tom Moore knows it even better....but I don't want him playing QB for the team........
 

mrbyte

Be careful what you wish for.
Joined
Sep 5, 2008
Posts
649
Reaction score
18
Location
Coventry, England
I think its more a case of realising Stanton isnt going to make it bacl for the playoffs and knowing Lindley will be our best chance and giving him all the reps he can handle
 

b8rtm8nn

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Jan 14, 2003
Posts
3,372
Reaction score
1,648
Location
Tucson
I think it's pretty clear when LT is throwing to the wrong person or wrong spot in practice, that putting him in a game means multiple interceptions plus a stat line worse than Lindley's.

Lindley was beyond horrible in that 2012 NY Jets game, that is what LT would look like. At least Lindley will look like a terrible 3rd stringer and not a terrible rookie.
 

Redneck Voodoo

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jul 12, 2014
Posts
2,178
Reaction score
855
I can't help but think (hope) that this is now just a ploy to make everyone overlook us in the playoffs so we can rise up and kick them in the nuts.
 

Darkside

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 27, 2010
Posts
8,107
Reaction score
191
Location
Tempe, AZ
starting Lindley is not a testament to how bad LT is.... it is just the coach trying to get a little more live fire experience for the one QB who knows the entire playbook....hoping that will give us the best chance to win in the playoffs.

IMO...he should start LT from here on out anyway...even with a limited playbook....the only thing Lindley has that LT does not...is a losing mindset....but LT has wheels, which Lindley really doesn't.... I would start LT just to see if he has "IT"....some dudes just go in a zone when the pressure is on and find a way to win....we know Lindley does not have it...maybe LT does....I mean hell,...Tim Tebow was a horrible QB for three and a half quarters...then went all pro for the last ten minutes of the game and led the Broncs to the playoffs...maybe LT at least has some of that??...will never know with him riding the pine.
The only thing Lindley has,...is he knows the playbook....I am pretty sure Tom Moore knows it even better....but I don't want him playing QB for the team........

I agree with your very first point, but disagree with the rest of it. You play to win it all. I'd love to win a playoff game, but if we're counting on luck or a few lucky scrambles from Logan to win one game, then fine, but we're not going to win another. You have to go with the guy who knows the entire playbook, pray he wins and learns against the 9ers, pray he wins and learns his first playoff game, and go from there.

Tebow is an awful QB. Yes, he won one playoff game. You, and others, seem to love Tebow, do you even realize how long it's been since he played competitive football? He was a bad QB then, what makes you think he's somehow improved after NOT playing for these years? It's totally ridiculous, the Tebow comments. I thought the Warner returning comments were ridiculous, but the Tebow comments make those dudes look like little Einsteins.
 

Darkside

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 27, 2010
Posts
8,107
Reaction score
191
Location
Tempe, AZ
I can't help but think (hope) that this is now just a ploy to make everyone overlook us in the playoffs so we can rise up and kick them in the nuts.

None of it is a ploy. We're hurting. We have endured too much. It's one thing to lose everyone we did, but quite another to lose your #1 and #2 QB. No team can overcome that. Nobody.

I remember watching in the 70's, teams had some beloved backups, really well liked dudes, that came in and won games. But this isn't 1970. And frankly, even those teams, back then, didn't lose their #1 and #2. It's impossible. It's unfortunate. It sucks so bad.

People expect somehow that BA has something up his sleeve, that he'll somehow pull it out. But that's because he's been so awesome this year. We can't overcome these QB injuries, not in today's football. He's an awesome coach to do what he's done, really awesome, to go 5-3 with a backup. But now at QB #3, and sometimes at #4, there's no way.

It's time to face reality people. BA ran out of quality players, at several positions, all year, but none so important as QB. It can't be done.
 

NJCardFan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jul 14, 2005
Posts
14,974
Reaction score
2,968
Location
Bridgeton, NJ
then why have him on the team. Just think about it. Why would you prefer to lose with Lindley, than give Thomas a chance to show what he might be able to do? To me it is like throwing in the towel. If Thomas is THAT BAD, why keep paying him to sit on the bench? Did we draft him only to run the projector in the film room?

Valid question. It would have been better to have a Brady Quinn or some other unsigned veteran as the 3rd stringer and put Thomas on the practice squad.
 

WildBB

Yogi n da Bear
Joined
Mar 20, 2004
Posts
14,295
Reaction score
1,239
Location
The Sonoran Jungle - West
Valid question. It would have been better to have a Brady Quinn or some other unsigned veteran as the 3rd stringer and put Thomas on the practice squad.

They could have lost Thomas then. It's a process with him. Aaron Rogers stayed four years on the sidelines. I think in our immediate gratification minds we can give the FO one or two years working with this kid, minimum.
 

RugbyMuffin

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Apr 30, 2003
Posts
30,485
Reaction score
4,877
Logan Thomas needs a lot of work.

I do not think it is a problem that he is not starting this year.
 

Mitch

Crawled Through 5 FB Fields
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Posts
13,405
Reaction score
2,982
Location
Wrentham, MA
Logan Thomas needs a lot of work.

I do not think it is a problem that he is not starting this year.

That's well said.

But, moving forward Thomas' chances of every being "the guy" are very very slim. BA has stated emphatically in the past that if you are going to develop a young QB, you don't develop him by having him hold a clipboard on the sidelines.

The way BA gives his starting QB the vast majority of the reps---does not bode well for a young #3 QB who basically is running the scout team and other team's plays.

Thomas will be moved to TE sooner rather than later, imho.
 

Jim Otis

Hall of Famer
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Posts
1,262
Reaction score
187
Location
Mississippi
They could have lost Thomas then. It's a process with him. Aaron Rogers stayed four years on the sidelines. I think in our immediate gratification minds we can give the FO one or two years working with this kid, minimum.


Well said WildBB .
The one thing that I think might be overlooked about LT is this , given his height , weight , strong throwing arm , and excellent athleticism , how many really believe that if he had all the mental intangibles to start in year one , he would have been there in the forth round ???
 

NJCardFan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jul 14, 2005
Posts
14,974
Reaction score
2,968
Location
Bridgeton, NJ
They could have lost Thomas then. It's a process with him. Aaron Rogers stayed four years on the sidelines. I think in our immediate gratification minds we can give the FO one or two years working with this kid, minimum.

I understand your point but no one would have picked him up.
 

redheat

A real American hero
Joined
Nov 21, 2004
Posts
921
Reaction score
218
It's because Stanton is out the entire playoffs. Lindley can run the offense better so they want to get him as many reps as possible.
 

Redneck Voodoo

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jul 12, 2014
Posts
2,178
Reaction score
855
None of it is a ploy. We're hurting. We have endured too much. It's one thing to lose everyone we did, but quite another to lose your #1 and #2 QB. No team can overcome that. Nobody.

I remember watching in the 70's, teams had some beloved backups, really well liked dudes, that came in and won games. But this isn't 1970. And frankly, even those teams, back then, didn't lose their #1 and #2. It's impossible. It's unfortunate. It sucks so bad.

People expect somehow that BA has something up his sleeve, that he'll somehow pull it out. But that's because he's been so awesome this year. We can't overcome these QB injuries, not in today's football. He's an awesome coach to do what he's done, really awesome, to go 5-3 with a backup. But now at QB #3, and sometimes at #4, there's no way.

It's time to face reality people. BA ran out of quality players, at several positions, all year, but none so important as QB. It can't be done.


Yes, I know all of this. I should've used the sarcasm icon. ;)
 

john h

Registered User
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
10,552
Reaction score
13
Location
Little Rock
starting Lindley is not a testament to how bad LT is.... it is just the coach trying to get a little more live fire experience for the one QB who knows the entire playbook....hoping that will give us the best chance to win in the playoffs.

IMO...he should start LT from here on out anyway...even with a limited playbook....the only thing Lindley has that LT does not...is a losing mindset....but LT has wheels, which Lindley really doesn't.... I would start LT just to see if he has "IT"....some dudes just go in a zone when the pressure is on and find a way to win....we know Lindley does not have it...maybe LT does....I mean hell,...Tim Tebow was a horrible QB for three and a half quarters...then went all pro for the last ten minutes of the game and led the Broncs to the playoffs...maybe LT at least has some of that??...will never know with him riding the pine.
The only thing Lindley has,...is he knows the playbook....I am pretty sure Tom Moore knows it even better....but I don't want him playing QB for the team........

They said he was horrible in practice. We need to sign a experienced QB or draft one next year. Also a big RB.
 

Buckybird

Hoist the Lombardi Trophy
Joined
Nov 11, 2002
Posts
25,296
Reaction score
6,310
Location
Dallas, TX
That's well said.

But, moving forward Thomas' chances of every being "the guy" are very very slim. BA has stated emphatically in the past that if you are going to develop a young QB, you don't develop him by having him hold a clipboard on the sidelines.

The way BA gives his starting QB the vast majority of the reps---does not bode well for a young #3 QB who basically is running the scout team and other team's plays.

Thomas will be moved to TE sooner rather than later, imho.

Yep! I laughed when we picked him & threw away a 4th rounder on him. :mad:

Other than size, arm & a little mobility he never showed much in college worth the gamble.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
556,112
Posts
5,433,382
Members
6,329
Latest member
cardinals2025
Top