I'll be honest, I'm probably Pac 10 biased but I thought UW just played smarter than Illinois. UW had a 14 point lead when 3 plays in a row UW took a charge that was called a block and Illinois got 3 three point plays. 2 of those were bad calls, the 3rd was 50/50 so you can take it. That was the 3rd time in the first half that Brandon Roy had clearly taken a charge and all he had to show for it was one no call and 2 block fouls.
It seemed to me that at the half Romar decided look guys they are not going to call the charge, so let's go to the basket. Once Illinois started getting fouls, even though UW was behind, you could see what was coming, UW was going to parade to the line. The final total appeared very one sided but if the story I read this morning was right, UW took 15 3's in the game, only 5 in the 2nd half, and Illinois took 18, 12 in the 2nd half. Seems to me UW figured out they weren't calling charges so take the ball to the rim, while Illinois was settling for 3's too much? Augustine was killing UW but Illinois stopped going to him.
I found this quote in the game story that seems to be Dee Brown admitting they were fouling a lot.
Illinois was called for 28 fouls and the Huskies 17.
"They were physical. They were banging me," Roy said. "I came off screens and they were grabbing me."
Said Brown: "We were hacking more. We were undisciplined on defense."
I will say this, if that was UCLA not Illinois I'd be complaining too, so I suspect I'm just biased because I'm a big Brandon Roy fan, but I really felt like UW figured out that Illinois was grabbing guys coming off screens and so they started going to Roy a lot knowing they could get Illinois in foul trouble.
Tough game to watch though, the fouls took the whole flow away. That same thing happened the 2nd time UCLA played UW the refs were calling fouls (both ways) like crazy.