I'm bummed Makovicka's not going to be back.

bratwurst

on double secret probation
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
5,940
Reaction score
1
Location
Santo Poco
I agree - missablocka might not have started well here, but he was starting to show something. I would have much rather kept him as the backup at least instead of bringing McKinley back.

What kind of contract did McKinley sign? Could he just be back as a body? Is it correct to assume that makovicka would be too expensive to have on the roster with Hodgins too? Would that be too much to spend on fullbacks?
 

CardinalChris

Big Man Himself
Joined
Jul 11, 2002
Posts
3,929
Reaction score
0
Location
Fresno, CA
Not only more expensive, but your backup fullback better be a special teamer, and McKinley is great at it.
 

Ryanwb

ASFN IDOL
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
35,576
Reaction score
6
Location
Mesa
So Mackovicka wasn't/isn't under contract?
 
Top