Into the Grizzly Maze

Brian in Mesa

Advocatus Diaboli
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
73,492
Reaction score
25,662
Location
Killjoy Central
Into the Grizzly Maze

Release Date: June 26, 2015 (limited)
Studio: Vertical Entertainment
Director: David Hackl
MPAA Rating: N/A
Screenwriters: J.R. Reher, Guy Moshe
Genre: Thriller, Action, Horror

Starring: Thomas Jane, James Marsden, Billy Bob Thornton, Scott Glenn, Piper Perabo

Plot Summary: Two estranged brothers reunite at their childhood home in the Alaskan wild. They set out on a two-day hike and are stalked by an unrelenting grizzly bear.

You must be registered for see images attach
 

BillsCarnage

ASFN Addict
Joined
Dec 2, 2005
Posts
5,827
Reaction score
1,197
Location
The Flip Side
Sounds like a pseudo remake of Grizzly, but then so does any grizzly bear movie...

Grizzly terrified me as a kid, but now it's kinda cheesy.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
88,546
Reaction score
40,346
I actually saw it on demand. not horrible but not great either, I have no idea how they got Marsden and company in the movie though.
 

Bert

Walkin' on Sunshine
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Oct 16, 2008
Posts
10,139
Reaction score
3,236
Location
Arizona
I actually saw it on demand. not horrible but not great either, I have no idea how they got Marsden and company in the movie though.

I almost rented this on-demand last night. Then I saw it was 7.99 and I didn't, but I looked at the cast and thought the same thing. Actually what I thought was his had to be slated to be like a wide release and maybe the studio thought it sucked so it went straight to video?

I'm glad you reminded me because I wanted to ask Cheese or someone who knows how Hollywood works how that all works. I mean, they couldn't have assembled this cast for a straight to video movie right? I know these aren't HUGE stars, but they are pretty decent, what would you guys say, B listers?

Billy Bob
Mardsen
Piper Perabo
Thomas Jane

My question is just, do studios ever finance movies like this, do photography and then view a rough cut and then just pull the plug and send it straight to video? Just curious. Or was this most likely made for VOD?

I might rent it now just to see it.
 

PDXChris

All In!
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 28, 2003
Posts
31,849
Reaction score
28,922
Location
Nowhere
I actually saw it on demand. not horrible but not great either, I have no idea how they got Marsden and company in the movie though.

Because 2006 was a long time ago.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
46,500
Reaction score
17,049
Location
Round Rock, TX
I almost rented this on-demand last night. Then I saw it was 7.99 and I didn't, but I looked at the cast and thought the same thing. Actually what I thought was his had to be slated to be like a wide release and maybe the studio thought it sucked so it went straight to video?

I'm glad you reminded me because I wanted to ask Cheese or someone who knows how Hollywood works how that all works. I mean, they couldn't have assembled this cast for a straight to video movie right? I know these aren't HUGE stars, but they are pretty decent, what would you guys say, B listers?

Billy Bob
Mardsen
Piper Perabo
Thomas Jane

My question is just, do studios ever finance movies like this, do photography and then view a rough cut and then just pull the plug and send it straight to video? Just curious. Or was this most likely made for VOD?

I might rent it now just to see it.

None of those people could carry a theatrical film.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
46,500
Reaction score
17,049
Location
Round Rock, TX
Yeah I was pretty clear they were all B listers at best.

You answered your own question. With that cast they couldn't get theatrical distribution, but that cast is a slam dunk for direct-to-video.
 

Bert

Walkin' on Sunshine
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Oct 16, 2008
Posts
10,139
Reaction score
3,236
Location
Arizona
You answered your own question. With that cast they couldn't get theatrical distribution, but that cast is a slam dunk for direct-to-video.

Your face answered it's own question! :mulli: :p

I just wondered if the plug gets pulled sometimes and stuff that might have been intended for theaters winds up going straight to video.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
46,500
Reaction score
17,049
Location
Round Rock, TX
Your face answered it's own question! :mulli: :p

I just wondered if the plug gets pulled sometimes and stuff that might have been intended for theaters winds up going straight to video.

The answer to that is, "Sure, all the time." This might very well be one of those times. Every filmmaker wants theatrical distribution, but only a small percentage get it. There are several Samuel L Jackson and Bruce Willis movies over the past several years that never made it to theaters. Hell, Steven Seagal and Jean-Claude Van Damme make all their money that way.

Theatrical is expensive--if the powers that be at distributors don't think it will draw, then they won't put it out there.
 

Bert

Walkin' on Sunshine
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Oct 16, 2008
Posts
10,139
Reaction score
3,236
Location
Arizona
The answer to that is, "Sure, all the time." This might very well be one of those times. Every filmmaker wants theatrical distribution, but only a small percentage get it. There are several Samuel L Jackson and Bruce Willis movies over the past several years that never made it to theaters. Hell, Steven Seagal and Jean-Claude Van Damme make all their money that way.

Theatrical is expensive--if the powers that be at distributors don't think it will draw, then they won't put it out there.

Interesting. Thanks for the replys. :) The inner workings of the Hollywood machine are kind of fascinating.
 
Top