I don't know. Depends. Compared to normal peeps like you and I.... Probably not.I love the guy but his toughness has to be in question…… dude falls down all the time before he gets hit and now it’s 3 weeks for a minor injury?
Are you serious with this nonsense?I love the guy but his toughness has to be in question…… dude falls down all the time before he gets hit and now it’s 3 weeks for a minor injury?
??? Who said that? Earlier in the week the coach said it will be Kylers decision?This should go in the hall of fame of dumb threads. It's already been reported that he wants to play, but they are holding him out.
This should go in the hall of fame of dumb threads. It's already been reported that he wants to play, but they are holding him out.
He said that Friday on 98.7.Keim said it’s up to Murray.
I call BS it’s not Murray’s decision, he wanted to play last week. This is an organizational decision to protect their franchise QB and rightfully so a healthy Murray for the stretch run is more important than a couple mid season games!Keim said it’s up to Murray.
Even better. We have a smart QB.Keim said it’s up to Murray.
This makes it sound like injuries weren't a problem for him last year which is 100 percent false. We failed to make the playoffs mostly because of his injuries last year. This is 2 straight seasons where Kyler's fragility is costing us significantly.This is borderline trolling. Trying to start a flame war?
The answer is NO. Never missed a game in his first two seasons. And, never in high school or college either.
Playing with an injury could be the definition of "not a wuss".This makes it sound like injuries weren't a problem for him last year which is 100 percent false. We failed to make the playoffs mostly because of his injuries last year. This is 2 straight seasons where Kyler's fragility is costing us significantly.
I didn't say he was a wuss. I sure in the hell don't want my Franchise player missing a quarter of the season. do you? That's a significant loss in and of itself.Playing with an injury could be the definition of "not a wuss".
That's the topic of this thread. As to whether it costs us significantly? Yet to be determined this year.
No I don't. I agree with you so what is the problem exactly?I didn't say he was a wuss. I sure in the hell don't want my Franchise player missing a quarter of the season. do you? That's a significant loss in and of itself.
You quoted and corrected me, so I replied. Now you agree. So...I guess I needed to point out the error of your ways first? lolNo I don't. I agree with you so what is the problem exactly?
Nah. I was just pointing out you were not on the topic. No big deal. He should be playing. But he isn't a wuss. If what Harry's connect is giving out good info.You quoted and corrected me, so I replied. Now you agree. So...I guess I needed to point out the error of your ways first? lol