BirdGangThing
Cultist
That is no reason to start someone omgProbably keep starting Dobbs based upon the draft pick given up for him.
That is no reason to start someone omgProbably keep starting Dobbs based upon the draft pick given up for him.
And here we areI guess we'll see. Gannon liked Tune so much we traded for Dobbs, then started him.
Based on?I think Gannon likes Tune
I also think Petzing wanted to start Dobbs over Tune and got his way
Unless Monti and Petzing don’t want to look like huge donkeys by benching a guy they gave up a 5th in games they would likely lose anyways.That is no reason to start someone omg
I guess In order to not rush things with Tune and jeopardizing his learning curveBased on?
I'm asking about his specific comment that makes it seem the HC and OC were in differing opinions and the OC got his way. What's that based on?I guess In order to not rush things with Tune and jeopardizing his learning curve
He was a big investment for the franchise, they want to protect him
Disagree. When you fumble twice it usually cost you the game.If Ertz make two catchable catches, we probably win. Dobbs did enough to put us in a position to win on the road against a top 10 defense with just a handful of practices. He'll get a few more starts.
So, we didn't have the ball twice down by 1 and 4 respectively in the 4th quarter? Ertz didn't drop a TD pass and a key 1st down? You disagree with all of that? And I'm not sure how many players survive the way the pocket collapsed on one of those fumbles.Disagree. When you fumble twice it usually cost you the game.
Based on what Gannon's said about TuneBased on?
So start Dobbs and lose... to save face?Unless Monti and Petzing don’t want to look like huge donkeys by benching a guy they gave up a 5th in games they would likely lose anyways.
I guess I missed those quotes of Gannon saying he preferred Tune or likes Tune over Dobbs. All I've heard is him say positive things about each QB, never tipping his hand of preference.Based on what Gannon's said about Tune
Based on Petzing obviously being the one who wanted Dobbs
Just good enough to lose. The pass to Ertz should on the numbers. We’re talking about a 10 yard pass.So, we didn't have the ball twice down by 1 and 4 respectively in the 4th quarter? Ertz didn't drop a TD pass and a key 1st down? You disagree with all of that? And I'm not sure how many players survive the way the pocket collapsed on one of those fumbles.
He played good enough to give us a chance win.
I never said that - but hey - whatever makes your boat float or finds your lost remoteI guess I missed those quotes of Gannon saying he preferred Tune or likes Tune over Dobbs. All I've heard is him say positive things about each QB, never tipping his hand of preference.
Easy there... It's a 5th round pick. Not like it 2nd or 3rd.Unless Monti and Petzing don’t want to look like huge donkeys by benching a guy they gave up a 5th in games they would likely lose anyways.
AssumptionI mean, they didn't roll with Dobbs because Tune was better in practice...
Poor analysis, see previous thread based on this videoWatch this if you think Tune is ready to start:
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
So you watched it, now what do you say?
There's another video that came out just today - 4 quarters long with no touch downs - 4.4 ypc (that's including yards after catch) or he holds on to the ball too longWatch this if you think Tune is ready to start:
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
So you watched it, now what do you say?
Word big bird - we weren't in that game because of Dobbs - we were in that game despite DobbsNo doubt Dobbs play was compromised by the O-Line play. That said if the Cards were afraid Tune would play like a rookie, that’s exactly how Dobbs played. I thought the fact that the Cards started the last drive with a 4 yard pass said all I needed to know about their assessment of Dobbs’ skills.