the board passed a measure to create a special taxing district or some like funding mechanism to pay the league to operate the arena for next season for an amount not to exceed $25M
i'm sure there will be some legal challenges, but doubt they will stick
Not so sure about that. I bet the Goldwater Institute will sue on the grounds that this violates the "gift clause" of the Arizona Constitution. It is the same tactic that brought the City North project in North Scottsdale to a screeching halt. However, I am curious why we haven't heard from these anti-tax groups yet. Maybe that means something...
I'm no legal genius, but I think this is the section that they would reference in a legal challenge. Not sure if it is appropriate or not, but it seems to be one avenue they would pursue:
7.
Gift or loan of credit; subsidies; stock ownership; joint ownership
Section 7. Neither the state, nor any county, city, town, municipality, or other subdivision of the state shall ever give or loan its credit in the aid of, or make any donation or grant, by
subsidy or otherwise, to any individual, association, or corporation, or become a subscriber to, or a shareholder in, any company or corporation, or become a joint owner with any person, company, or corporation, except as to such ownerships as may accrue to the state by operation or provision of law or as authorized by law solely for investment of the monies in the various funds of the state.