Originally posted by jmt
If true he should be fired now. Why keep him around. His firing might light a fire under a couple of guys worried about a job next season!
Originally posted by pinnacle
sully will be gone along with everyone else....
I am guessing we will suprise to the upside on the coach we get in here...just a guess. I think we are done fooling around...it may not be a top guy who has been a head coach in the NFL before - but I think we will at least get an up and coming coordinator who has a track record of success...just my opinion...
Originally posted by pinnacle
sully will be gone along with everyone else....
I am guessing we will suprise to the upside on the coach we get in here...just a guess. I think we are done fooling around...it may not be a top guy who has been a head coach in the NFL before - but I think we will at least get an up and coming coordinator who has a track record of success...just my opinion...
Originally posted by JeffGollin
I do not know what happened to Jeff Blake.
It is said about great coaches - "They'll beat you with their team, and then switch teams and beat you with yours."
The opposite is true also.
Just compare how crisply the Browns (an equally young team) executed a more complex offense (complete with flea-flickers and Northcutt running inside reverses and shovels) with our stodgier offense featuring plays which take an eternity to develop.
It begs the questions - How does their playbook differ from our playbook? What do they do practicing the execution of their plays that we don't do?
Originally posted by pinnacle
blake gets my disappointment of the year..he has morphed into what Jake Plummer was for the Cardinals...inaccurate, not reading defenses very well, etc.
I do not know what happened to Jeff Blake. I have tape on him from past seasons..I was physched - he looked good...he seemed to be alot of things jake was not. Now jeff looks fundamentally unsound...
Originally posted by CatBoxBackFan
This may be a dumb question but here goes,are the coaches salaries calculated into the salary cap?
Originally posted by pinnacle
1. someone who can read defenses.
2. someone who can look off receivers and not show from the snap who they are throwing to.
3.someone who can make accurate short passes and not get our receivers killed.
Originally posted by Russ Smith
Blake is not a great QB, his season to date is just about what he did last year in Baltimore which people seemed to think was good.
Considering what he has to throw to and how poor the offensive playcalling is I'm not surprised he hasn't flourished. I figured we'd be more competitive and I expected less turnovers(the fumbles are troubling to me many have been without him being touched) but overall this isn't just Blake's fault. He's not going to complete 60% of his throws that has been the case his whole career. The problem we've had is we have no deep threats for him to throw to so he's had to keep the ball underneath and that's led to more picks, less big plays and a QB looking worse than he really is.
Anybody expecting Blake to be a great QB was just being overly optimistic, he's good QB put in a very bad position this year.
Originally posted by pinnacle
azcb34..I was also screaming for jeff blake...but in defense of our decision - there was not much out there.. When the fake kordell stewart rumor was out there (that we were going to sign him) - I went nuts - I thought he would be the worst choice...and he was. The bears are actually competitive now that chandler is the QB... griese would not have worked here..kordell sucks....not much to choose from.
what I want is simple:
1. someone who can read defenses.
2. someone who can look off receivers and not show from the snap who they are throwing to.
3.someone who can make accurate short passes and not get our receivers killed.
Originally posted by RedStorm
I agree with Russ. Blake is not the problem. He has no WRs to throw to and a OL that is under performing.
The coaching staff goes except for Sully who goes back to coaching WRs.
Originally posted by pinnacle
russ...I did not expect great..but decent would have been ok..when guys are open - he seems to have poor accuracy on short stuff.
I think blakes #'s are not the true story..seems from watching that alot of his yardage and TDs come late after the game is out of reach..pittsburgh was technically a very good game for blake - but most of it came after it was too late.....kind of like Jakes #'s. But...I think if Jake was here - it would be worse.. I do not think jake could have beat the packers...he would have been a deer in the headlights..