Kyler Murray has been working out since Jan

DVontel

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 28, 2015
Posts
13,017
Reaction score
23,172
I’m on the kyler is good side of the equation, but you’re missing the argument if that’s your rebuttal. They’re speaking solely about kyler solely as a passer and not generally as a QB where his running helped elevate him to ROTY and pro bowl status.
Pretty much.


That Jalen Hurts projection is straight up laughable though.
 

ajcardfan

I see you.
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
38,500
Reaction score
25,445
What I have said is that I would like to see Kyler working with a QB coach in the offseason. That's my opinion for ALL young QB's in the offseason. There is not enough time in OTA's alone to work on mechanics or spend hours in the film room studying tape to help diagnose defenses. If you want to improve in those areas you need to work on them in the offseason and I don't think you can successfully do it on your own, you need a coach.

Why don't you tweet to Murray that you want to see his offseason QB coach?
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
63,526
Reaction score
57,862
Location
SoCal
TBF Kyler wasn't special as a runner in his rookie season. A vast majority of him winning rookie of the year was due to his passing. Running obviously became a big part of his success in year 2, though he was still a better passer in year 2 than year 1.
And by “wasn’t special” you mean the third most rushing yards by a QB at 544 yards and 4 TDs and top 50 in the league (including all RBs) in rushing. Got it.
 

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
22,462
Reaction score
40,982
Location
UK
such an average rookie year that they gave him the rookie of the year award and then he follows it up with a pro bowl in year 2.

context matters to everyone but you, pretty much all those QBs walked into scenarios with a better team. our 2018 offense was historically bad, you seriously need to go back 30+ years to find a worse offense. Why am I still in this thread? it makes me want to puke. :help:

QB's nearly always win OROTY and he had absolutely no competition. Drop him in any previous year and he wouldn't even be in contention.

When Danny Dimes and Haskins are your competition you could have won OROTY.
 

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
22,462
Reaction score
40,982
Location
UK
A vast majority of him winning rookie of the year was due to his passing. Running obviously became a big part of his success in year 2, though he was still a better passer in year 2 than year 1.

Nah man. All of the reason he won OROTY is he was the #1 pick and had no competition. Even when he won it many NFL commentators said it should have been Josh Jacobs.

He certainly didn't win it because of his passing. Gardner Minshew had a better passer rating as a rookie. More TD's in less games. More yards per game. More yards per attempt.
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
63,526
Reaction score
57,862
Location
SoCal
QB's nearly always win OROTY and he had absolutely no competition. Drop him in any previous year and he wouldn't even be in contention.

When Danny Dimes and Haskins are your competition you could have won OROTY.
Actually Gardner minshew was legit competition for ROTY, regardless of what you thought of him as a prospect.
 

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
22,462
Reaction score
40,982
Location
UK
Actually Gardner minshew was legit competition for ROTY, regardless of what you thought of him as a prospect.

I had no thoughts about him as a prospect. I thought he was hard done to not to be more in contention. But my recollection is that it was mainly a 2 horse race in the media anyway.

Either way, Kyler won it because there was very little high level competition.
 

CardsSunsDbacks

Not So Skeptical
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Posts
10,143
Reaction score
6,582
And by “wasn’t special” you mean the third most rushing yards by a QB at 544 yards and 4 TDs and top 50 in the league (including all RBs) in rushing. Got it.
Considering what we saw that he is capable of last season, yeah it wasn't special at all in comparison. Never said he wasn't a good runner in 2019, only that it's not the primary reason he won OROY.
 

Shane

Comin for you!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
69,050
Reaction score
38,958
Location
Las Vegas
QB's nearly always win OROTY and he had absolutely no competition. Drop him in any previous year and he wouldn't even be in contention.

When Danny Dimes and Haskins are your competition you could have won OROTY.

If the RB in Oakland didn’t get hurt he wouldn’t have won it.
 

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
22,462
Reaction score
40,982
Location
UK
Out of interest what do people here consider a good year? What's the barometer for success?

Passing only, no rushing, I'd have to see 4300 yards, 30 TD's, 12 or less INT's, and 7.7 YPA with a 100+ passer rating.
 

SoonerLou

ASFN Addict
Joined
Sep 15, 2019
Posts
8,146
Reaction score
12,248
Location
St Louis, MO
Out of interest what do people here consider a good year? What's the barometer for success?

Passing only, no rushing, I'd have to see 4300 yards, 30 TD's, 12 or less INT's, and 7.7 YPA with a 100+ passer rating.
To @CardsSunsDbacks point Thats basically not far off what Kyler was on pace for the 1st 14 games of the season. (97 passer rating/4160 passing yards/30 Tds)

If Kyler played in the NFC East I think that would skew Kyler into probably being overrated. I think the NFC West is now making him underrated. Its a brutal division. Hopefully he can overcome it.

Getting back his normal quick release/throwing motion should help.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,389
Reaction score
29,775
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Out of interest what do people here consider a good year? What's the barometer for success?

Passing only, no rushing, I'd have to see 4300 yards, 30 TD's, 12 or less INT's, and 7.7 YPA with a 100+ passer rating.

Counting stats are for suckers. Efficiency is what matters; lots of guys put up a ton of yards in garbage time. That said, 9 QBs passed for over 4000 yards last year alone; that should be a threshold number as a passer. 10 QBs had 8.0 YPA or greater. That's probably a more important number (Kyler was 21st at 7.1 last year — more evidence that Kyler needs to get better at those "doubles" or "layup" routes between 8-15 yards downfield).
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,356
Reaction score
68,428
Considering what we saw that he is capable of last season, yeah it wasn't special at all in comparison. Never said he wasn't a good runner in 2019, only that it's not the primary reason he won OROY.

did the 2019 voters have a time machine to realize that the 544 yards wouldn’t look that special in retrospect to his 2020 numbers when making their decision?

trying to argue that his rushing yards weren’t a big part of him winning ROY is ridiculous, especially using the mental gymnastics above as a reason.
 

SoonerLou

ASFN Addict
Joined
Sep 15, 2019
Posts
8,146
Reaction score
12,248
Location
St Louis, MO
Counting stats are for suckers. Efficiency is what matters; lots of guys put up a ton of yards in garbage time. That said, 9 QBs passed for over 4000 yards last year alone; that should be a threshold number as a passer. 10 QBs had 8.0 YPA or greater. That's probably a more important number (Kyler was 21st at 7.1 last year — more evidence that Kyler needs to get better at those "doubles" or "layup" routes between 8-15 yards downfield).
FWIW it was at 7.6 after the first 9 games

Last 7 were 6.4

I'm hoping it was just the shoulder/changed throwing motion. Or it might have been defensive adjustments. We'll find out this year.
 

CardsSunsDbacks

Not So Skeptical
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Posts
10,143
Reaction score
6,582
did the 2019 voters have a time machine to realize that the 544 yards wouldn’t look that special in retrospect to his 2020 numbers when making their decision?

trying to argue that his rushing yards weren’t a big part of him winning ROY is ridiculous, especially using the mental gymnastics above as a reason.
I mean Josh Allen ran for 631 yards and 8 TDs in 12 games as a rookie just the year prior. Think it's safe to say that people were expecting more from Murray in that aspect. He was already a better passer than expected by most and that was definitely the number one reason he won OROY.

With the 2nd part of your post you are putting words in my mouth. Never said it wasn't a big part of the award just that it wasn't as a big a part as his passing.
 

Chris_Sanders

Not Always The Best Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
40,159
Reaction score
31,679
Location
Scottsdale, Az
Looks at Kylers rookie stats....Then looks at Justin Herberts rookie stats :shocker:

Joe Burrow would have outperformed Kyler's rookie season had he stayed healthy. He was on track for 4300 yards and 21 TD's.

Gardner Minshew had a better statistical rookie year had he played all 16 games instead of starting 12.

Baker Mayfield had a better rookie year and he did it in 13 games.

Deshaun Watson had a better rookie year.

Dak Prescott had a better rookie year.

Hell, even Jalen Hurts 4 games played in a garbage Philly team would have outstripped Kyler had he played a full season at the same rate. 4244 yards and 24 TD's.

He had a very average rookie year. On par with someone like Carson Wentz but below many guys we consider to be top QB's in the league. And his second year was only slightly better.


Kyler is supremely talented which is why it's frustrating that he isn't making the most of it. I expected at least Deshaun Watson things from him thus far, but instead got less than Carson Wentz (who had 33 passing TDs in year 2 and a 101.9 passer rating).

Before the "don't disrespect my QB" pile on's begin. I want Kyler to succeed. I like him as a person and a player. But we are lying to ourselves if we say he has lived up to his potential so far. For the #1 overall pick he has been distinctly average.

Maybe it's Kliff? It wouldn't surprise me. But either way let's not fool ourselves that as a passer he's been great.


Murray was a one year college starter. The bust rate on 1st year starters is very high. He has a lot of growth still to do. Herbert should be more advanced as a passer because of the amount of games played.

Herbert - 4 year starter
Burrow - 2 year starter
Mayfield - 3 year starter
Watson - 2 year starter
Prescott - 4 year starter

Now to your "projections if they played a whole season" Lets examine these numbers

QB1 65.3% completion. 3.2% TD INT: 1.2% Sack 7.3% QBR 56.2
QB2 64.4% completion. 3.7% TD INT 2.2% Sack 8.1% QBR 57.7
QB3 52.0% completion 4.1% TD INT 2.7% Sack 8.1% QBR 41.0

Which do you think Murray is and what are the other two "That would have had better seasons if they played all year?"
 

SECTION 11

vibraslap
Joined
Oct 11, 2002
Posts
16,371
Reaction score
4,806
Location
Between the Pipes
Nah man. All of the reason he won OROTY is he was the #1 pick and had no competition. Even when he won it many NFL commentators said it should have been Josh Jacobs.

So, lemme get this straight. He had no competition, but many commentators said it should have gone to Jacobs? I just want to be sure I understand.
 

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
22,462
Reaction score
40,982
Location
UK
Counting stats are for suckers. Efficiency is what matters; lots of guys put up a ton of yards in garbage time. That said, 9 QBs passed for over 4000 yards last year alone; that should be a threshold number as a passer. 10 QBs had 8.0 YPA or greater. That's probably a more important number (Kyler was 21st at 7.1 last year — more evidence that Kyler needs to get better at those "doubles" or "layup" routes between 8-15 yards downfield).

I'm trying to make it simple. Not require guys to have an degree in analytics.
 
Top