lattest ESPN scouts mock draft

seesred

Registered User
Joined
Jul 15, 2002
Posts
5,364
Reaction score
28
Location
section 8 row 10
1. San Francisco 49ers (2-14)
Aaron Rodgers* | QB | California
Like most teams drafting in the top five, the 49ers would like to trade down, stockpile picks and address more needs. More than likely, the 49ers' best bet will be to stay put and draft the player they deem to be the most valuable at a high position of need. In our opinion, that player is Rodgers. Neither Tim Rattay nor Ken Dorsey is a franchise quarterback and Rodgers would be a significant upgrade over both. Some feel that Alex Smith (Utah) has the same or better NFL potential, but we don't see it that way. Rodgers has just decent height (6-2) but he has terrific arm strength, good accuracy and above-average athleticism.

2. Miami Dolphins (4-12)
Ronnie Brown | RB | Auburn
The Dolphins' best bet would be trading down in order to acquire extra picks, but that scenario is unlikely. New head coach Nick Saban and his staff seem to be addressing needs along the defensive line in free agency, which leaves a lot of work left to be done on the other side of the ball. Saban must first decide if A.J. Feeley is his quarterback of the future. If not, drafting a quarterback would be the right move. If, however, Saban can live with Feeley as his franchise quarterback, drafting one of three top running backs in this class – Cedric Benson, Ronnie Brown and Carnell Williams – becomes the next best move because there simply isn't an offensive tackle who warrants consideration with the second overall pick. Benson might be the more powerful runner and Williams might be the most elusive, but Brown is the best overall running back in this year's draft. Brown is big, strong and fast enough to carry a heavy load in the NFL and he also possesses considerably better skills in the passing game than Benson and Williams.

3. Cleveland Browns (4-12)
Alex Smith* | QB | Utah
Like the two teams ahead of them, the Browns would ideally like to trade down, acquire extra picks and get a better value on one of three mid-to-late round offensive tackle prospects in this draft class – Alex Barron, Jammal Brown and Khalif Barnes. Assuming, however, they get stuck at No. 3, new GM Phil Savage has to decide whether he wants to draft his quarterback of the future – Smith or Rodgers, depending on which is available – or go in a different direction. Judging by Savage's game plan when he was helping control things in Baltimore, Savage would like to build the rest of the team first and plug in the quarterback later. The problem, however, is that there just isn't an elite defensive prospect worth picking at No. 3. The Browns have most recently addressed needs along their offensive line (Joe Andruzzi and Cosey Coleman) and at cornerback (Gary Baxter), which may signal Savage's realization that his best draft-day value will be at quarterback. Smith is one of the most intelligent and consistent quarterbacks to come out of the collegiate ranks in years. He will need time to develop physically and that may be the exact reason for acquiring veteran QB Trent Dilfer.

4. Chicago Bears (5-11)
Braylon Edwards | WR | Michigan
Don't be shocked if the Bears use this pick on a wide receiver, even after recently signing Muhsin Muhammad to a long-term deal. The team's biggest needs are along the offensive line and at tight end, but there isn't value at either of those positions at No. 4. The team might draft one of the top three running backs, but Edwards is the best available prospect at a position with similar need. The Bears have enough young talent on defense, but they desperately need more playmakers on the offensive side of the ball. Adding Muhammad and Edwards in one offseason could be just what QB Rex Grossman and RB Thomas Jones need. Some think the Bears will shy away from using another top pick on a Michigan wide receiver, but that theory is ridiculous. For starters, the current regime wasn't in place when the Bears drafted David Terrell. Secondly, Edwards is bigger and faster than Terrell and he made far more big plays at the collegiate level than Terrell did. Edwards is the best receiver in this year's draft and he has elite NFL potential.

5. Tampa Bay Buccaneers (5-11)
Carnell Williams | RB | Auburn
The Buccaneers could go in several different directions with this pick, including RB, OT, OG, DT or DB. Looking at the probabilities regarding how the top of the draft board will unfold, RB is likely to be the position that the Bucs will get their best value with the fifth overall pick. While Benson is a better fit for an offense looking for a load-carrying power runner, Williams is a better fit for Jon Gruden's version of the West Coast offense. Williams still needs to improve as a blocker, but he's the shiftiest and most elusive of the top three backs (Brown and Benson) and has the hands to become a legitimate weapon as a receiver out of the backfield. It also won't hurt Williams' chances that Gruden fell in love with him while coaching him at the Senior Bowl.

6. Tennessee Titans (5-11)
Adam Jones* | CB | West Virginia
The needs keep piling up thanks to another free agency mass exodus. Considering both of last year's starting cornerbacks (Rolle and Andre Dyson) are gone, the rebuilding Titans could really use a playmaker like Jones on defense and special teams. Not only does Jones have the cover skills, speed and toughness to develop into a shutdown cornerback in the NFL, but he also has loads of upside as an NFL return specialist.

7. Minnesota Vikings (from Raiders) (8-8)
Mike Williams* | WR | USC
The Vikings have few needs to address and can really focus in on the ones they do have with two first-round picks thanks to the Randy Moss deal with the Raiders. The team is trying to improve the depth of its receiving corps by signing Rod Gardner in free agency, but Gardner is nothing more than a No. 3 receiver in the NFL. Williams might not possess Moss' freakish talents, but he's a dynamic weapon in his own right. Running in the 4.5's at the combine really solidified Williams as a top-10 selection and the trio of Williams, Nate Burleson and Gardner could make the transition a lot easier than expected for QB Daunte Culpepper.

8. Arizona Cardinals (6-10)
Cedric Benson | RB | Texas
If the board unraveled as such, Dennis Green and company would have a difficult decision to make between Benson, his teammate, Derrick Johnson, and Miami CB Antrel Rolle – all top players at positions of need. Running backs have a tendency to slip on draft day, but Benson is one of three outstanding prospects in this year's class at that position and Green is notorious for drafting offense ahead of defense. Benson doesn't have great speed or elusiveness, but he's a north-south runner with great vision, size and power. He would instantly solidify one of the team's most glaring weaknesses after Emmitt Smith's retirement.

9. Washington Redskins (6-10)
Antrel Rolle | CB | Miami-Fla.

GBR
40
IN Green we trust
 

slanidrac16

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2002
Posts
15,207
Reaction score
14,886
Location
Plainfield, Il.
I got a feeling this is pretty much the way things are going to go.

Benson would almost be impossible to pass, but I think I would take Rolle only because Benson isn't that "perfect" fit for this offense. If indeed he was our selection then it would be imperative to grab a guy like Sproles because we still would not have the speed Denny Green needs in the backfield.
 

Syracusecards

DA's pass went that way
Joined
Oct 27, 2004
Posts
4,215
Reaction score
4,272
I'm hoping they take Rolle. There is a lot of depth at RB where we could get a good one in the 2nd round, or maybe even trade our 2nd and the 3rd from the Pats to move up into the first to grab one if necessary.
 

Pariah

H.S.
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
18
Location
The Aventine
Heck, I'd take rolle simply based on the fact that WE DON"T HAVE HARDLY ANY CBs!
 

earthsci

That Rapscallion!!
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
8,300
Reaction score
1
Location
Phoenix
seesred said:
Would we or should move up two spots and take Jones?

GBR
40
No. I like Denny's strategy. Don't give up picks (unless you are trading for The Edge).
 

JeffGollin

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
20,472
Reaction score
3,056
Location
Holmdel, NJ
Even at this late date, it's too early for mocks to mean anything. For example, where Edgerrin James goes could have a huge impact on our draft. If he goes to Miami, Brown drops further down the board. If we sign him, we probably wouldn't draft Benson (and, depending on what we gave up for him, we might be forced to draft a corner at #8 because we might not have a pick at #44 or in the remainder of the first 2 or 3 rounds).

Or if the Shelton for Henry deal went through, that would influence our choice at #8. Or if we added one or more picks in the first 3 rounds, we might be able to afford the luxury of not drafting a corner at #8 if Rod and Denny felt there was a lot of depth at the position in the draft pool
 

az jam

ASFN Icon
Joined
Mar 6, 2004
Posts
12,970
Reaction score
5,169
Location
Scottsdale, AZ
I actually think that Benson will be there when we pick. I would take him.
We can get a cb in round two. Of course we could also get a rb in round two!! This will be a very interesting and exciting draft for the Cards.
 

Camshaft

Registered
Joined
Jul 19, 2002
Posts
338
Reaction score
71
Location
Austin, TX
Bpa

The last I knew, DG goes with BPA. Derrick Johnson is certified bluechip and has the trait that DG really admires - SPEED. A marque LB does wonder for a defense. I truly would be amazed if Johnson is still around by the eighth pick with three defensive minded HCs selecting earlier. With that said, I'd go with the best CB. The CB position for the Cards is a sinkhole of sorr-i-ness right now.
 

john h

Registered User
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
10,552
Reaction score
13
Location
Little Rock
Syracusecards said:
I'm hoping they take Rolle. There is a lot of depth at RB where we could get a good one in the 2nd round, or maybe even trade our 2nd and the 3rd from the Pats to move up into the first to grab one if necessary.

I think Rolle would be a bigger risk than Benson and would not be as quick to produce as Benson. DB's need a little time to develop. RB's come ready to play.
 

cardsunsfan

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Apr 25, 2003
Posts
4,735
Reaction score
162
Location
Arizona
Well I doubt a second round corner will develop any quicker... We better hope the corners we draft develop quickly since we're in a world of hurt at the corner position! The Patriots looked pretty good this year with rookie corners...
 

JPlay

JPlay
Joined
Jan 10, 2005
Posts
1,211
Reaction score
0
Benson was ranked #1 overall for a long time on Kiper's board. The only reason he slipped was because of Ronnie Brown's 40 time. Wait till Benson has his pro day and 40 time, he may shoot back up to the top and Miami will take him.
 

Skedoozy

*lurk lurk lurk*
Joined
Mar 6, 2005
Posts
42
Reaction score
0
Location
Chandler, AZ
Am I the only one that would rather see the Cards draft a top 3 back then go after James or Alexander? We need a Franchise RB. Someone that will be here long after Warner is gone. You build through the draft and supplement through FA. If the Cards do not draft a Top 3 Back if he is there I see it as a huge mistake. A top 3 Back in this Offense will do jsut as nicely as a James or an Alexander. Hell Emmitt rushed for over 900 yards with the oldest RB legs in the league. Imagine what a fresh pair of turf burners will do.
 

JeffGollin

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
20,472
Reaction score
3,056
Location
Holmdel, NJ
I think Rolle would be a bigger risk than Benson and would not be as quick to produce as Benson.
Both Rolle and Benson have their risk aspects - Some question Rolle's suitability to play corner and not safety. Benson hasn't run the forty yet, and there are questions about possibility of "the Curt Enos Syndrome" in a RB that size.

That's why I keep advising us to keep a close watch on Carlos Rogers from Auburn. He has the size we need to match up with the latest crop of big wideouts, he runs in the 4.48 range and he's considered a very sound corner. Right now, he's edging into my Top 8.
 

JPlay

JPlay
Joined
Jan 10, 2005
Posts
1,211
Reaction score
0
Benson is probably the most sure fire NFL ready propect. He's a better college back than Cutis Enis ever was. He's more in the Shaun Alexander mold and everybody here wants Alexander. Personally I would rather have one of the Auburn RBs, since they fit the system better, but Benson is a bruiser will not be a bust.

Benson might not be available if he has a good pro day. Ronnie Brown's draft stocked soared after his 40 time, but Benson was thought to be the better prospect at the end of the year, you have to keep that in mind.
 

Syracusecards

DA's pass went that way
Joined
Oct 27, 2004
Posts
4,215
Reaction score
4,272
john h said:
I think Rolle would be a bigger risk than Benson and would not be as quick to produce as Benson. DB's need a little time to develop. RB's come ready to play.

I completely agree with what you said, but our corner situation is in dire straits right now. RB's are definitely more of a sure thing in the draft, but we won't be able to run the ball if teams can throw at will at us and put us in the hole early. If I'm an OC playing the Cards, I would probably just leave my rb on the bench and throw it every single down. With the corners we have right now, we could make AJ Feely look like Peyton Manning. You can't run the ball if you're behind 17 points.
 

Red Air Force

DILLIGAFF
Joined
Aug 31, 2002
Posts
1,693
Reaction score
1
Location
U.S. Air Force
Skedoozy said:
Am I the only one that would rather see the Cards draft a top 3 back then go after James or Alexander? We need a Franchise RB. Someone that will be here long after Warner is gone. You build through the draft and supplement through FA. If the Cards do not draft a Top 3 Back if he is there I see it as a huge mistake. A top 3 Back in this Offense will do jsut as nicely as a James or an Alexander. Hell Emmitt rushed for over 900 yards with the oldest RB legs in the league. Imagine what a fresh pair of turf burners will do.

I agree with you, and I think thats why I don't think we'll know for sure who our next RB will be till at least draft day. As of right now, with Alexander, James, Henry, Bennet, Benson, Brown and Williams all available, there a glut of RBs. Thats 7 RBs for only 3 teams reportedly interested in a RB, Miami, Tampa, and :newcards: .

By they time we pick at #8 we will know exactly which RBs are still left, and have a choice between FIVE great RB's. If Henry, James, or Alexander REALLY want off their current teams, they'll have to get in a reverse bidding war to see who gets to come to AZ, and if not, they can rot, and we draft the remaining Back.

The one reason I am for sigining one of the veteran RBs is that we would be adding TWO playmakers instead on just one. Having the position set PRIOR to the draft really frees us up to take a second playmaker, wether its Pacman, Rolle, or Johnson.
 

JPlay

JPlay
Joined
Jan 10, 2005
Posts
1,211
Reaction score
0
Syracusecards said:
I completely agree with what you said, but our corner situation is in dire straits right now. RB's are definitely more of a sure thing in the draft, but we won't be able to run the ball if teams can throw at will at us and put us in the hole early. If I'm an OC playing the Cards, I would probably just leave my rb on the bench and throw it every single down. With the corners we have right now, we could make AJ Feely look like Peyton Manning. You can't run the ball if you're behind 17 points.

I'm not sure a rookie CB is going to make us that much better anyway. CBs are 50/50 hit or miss. I would like us to pick up a vet and draft a 2CBs in the draft. We can play our CBs in nickel and Dime for a year until he gets up to speed.
 

Red Air Force

DILLIGAFF
Joined
Aug 31, 2002
Posts
1,693
Reaction score
1
Location
U.S. Air Force
JPlay said:
I'm not sure a rookie CB is going to make us that much better anyway. CBs are 50/50 hit or miss. I would like us to pick up a vet and draft a 2CBs in the draft. We can play our CBs in nickel and Dime for a year until he gets up to speed.

BTW over the last 20 years 1st round RB's only have about a 30% hit rate. The worst of the big 3 QB, WR, and RB
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
547,403
Posts
5,351,010
Members
6,304
Latest member
Dbacks05
Top