Leinart, Boldin welcome Fitzgerald back to lineup

RedViper

Registered
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Posts
1,742
Reaction score
19
Location
Flagstaff
Leinart, Boldin welcome Fitzgerald back to lineup

Associated Press
Nov. 8, 2006 05:47 PM


TEMPE - Pro Bowl receiver Larry Fitzgerald will be back this weekend, and he will get a warm welcome from Matt Leinart, Anquan Boldin and the rest of the Arizona Cardinals offense.

"He just always makes a couple of incredible catches every single day on the practice field and has been able to do the same thing in the games," coach Dennis Green said. "That's that one player that I think Matt needs, that other player to go to, and I think our offense needs that, too."

Fitzgerald, sidelined since injuring his right hamstring early in the Kansas City game on Oct. 8, went through a pain-free workout with the team on Wednesday and pronounced himself ready to go against Dallas at home on Sunday. advertisement




"I feel good," he said. "I feel a lot better than I did on Monday. I'm ready to go full speed come Sunday."

Fitzgerald said he was sore after his first practice back with the team on Monday, following the Cardinals' weekend off.

"It was more like a tendinitis feel, kind of a stretching," he said, "but I got an MRI on Monday so I knew there wasn't any structural damage anymore, so I could push it today, and I felt good when I did it."

Leinart has barely played with Fitzgerald. The rookie quarterback took over for Kurt Warner to start the Kansas City game, and connected with Fitzgerald on a five-yard touchdown pass in the first quarter. A short time later, Fitzgerald left with the injury, and watched from the sidelines as his team lost to Chicago, Oakland and Green Bay. The Cardinals (1-7) carry a seven-game losing streak into Sunday's contest.

"It helps us so much having him back," Leinart said. "His presence alone can change what a defense is going to do. He's just a game-breaker. He can go up and get the ball. He's made a ton of big plays in his career so far, and I haven't really had a chance to play with him."

In Fitzgerald's absence, the defenses have zeroed in on Boldin. Boldin reeled off various defensive schemes that opponents have used in Fitzgerald's absence.

"You name it, I've seen it," Boldin said. "Hopefully they won't be doing that as much."

With Fitzgerald back, defenses will have to decide which of the two star receivers deserves more attention.

"It's just hard if people are loading up on you," Green said. "When we get them both on the field, many times they're on the same side and one can clear for the other one - 1/2 or they're on opposite sides, and we go with three receivers, too."

Fitzgerald's might even ease some of the pressure on Arizona's sputtering ground game to spread the field for Edgerrin James.

"I hope I'll be able to help everybody," Fitzgerald said, "open things up for Edge a little bit, and also help Q' out. That was painful to watch and not being able to go out and help your team. I'm just glad I'm here now."
 

D-Dogg

A Whole New World
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2003
Posts
44,920
Reaction score
877
Location
In The End Zone
Fitz gets a TD on Sunday. Mark it down. His absence in the offense has been very apparent.
 

Shane

Comin for you!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
69,046
Reaction score
38,948
Location
Las Vegas
Fitz gets a TD on Sunday. Mark it down. His absence in the offense has been very apparent.

Yes and no. The team only averaged 17.3 points with him. Those #s are inflated by the 37 we put on the board against SF. The next 3 games with him we only averaged 11.3

We have averaged 15 pts a game without him. So as far as offensive production is concerned its really hard to say he was making that big a difference.
 

D-Dogg

A Whole New World
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2003
Posts
44,920
Reaction score
877
Location
In The End Zone
Yes and no. The team only averaged 17.3 points with him. Those #s are inflated by the 37 we put on the board against SF. The next 3 games with him we only averaged 11.3

We have averaged 15 pts a game without him. So as far as offensive production is concerned its really hard to say he was making that big a difference.

If you go by a point differential...sure. But can you really deny the guy's impact on the offense as a whole? Really...is BJ as the second receiver better than Fitz and Boldin as 1a and 1b in the offense? I think not. Games prior to Leinart starting are moot at this point because we are dealing with a totally different mindset at the QB position.

Fitz will make a TON of difference to Leinart...I don't see how you could deny that.

That's not even taking into account Leinart vs. Warner in the total offense, where I've seen Matt a very large upgrade.
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
If you go by a point differential...sure. But can you really deny the guy's impact on the offense as a whole? Really...is BJ as the second receiver better than Fitz and Boldin as 1a and 1b in the offense? I think not. Games prior to Leinart starting are moot at this point because we are dealing with a totally different mindset at the QB position.

Fitz will make a TON of difference to Leinart...I don't see how you could deny that.

That's not even taking into account Leinart vs. Warner in the total offense, where I've seen Matt a very large upgrade.

Leinart is a rookie and is playing like a rookie. He's no major upgrade-yet.
His QB rating is 17th out of 17 qualifiers in the NFC and he's 27-67 with 5.4 yards per attempt in his last two games. His receivers have dropped several passes but not 40 of them.

Inconsistent QB play is the price we're paying for Lienart's on the job training.
With Matt 23, Fitz 23, and Boldin 26 we should be seeing the investment pay dividends for years to come. But not this year.
 

Shane

Comin for you!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
69,046
Reaction score
38,948
Location
Las Vegas
If you go by a point differential...sure. But can you really deny the guy's impact on the offense as a whole? Really...is BJ as the second receiver better than Fitz and Boldin as 1a and 1b in the offense? I think not. Games prior to Leinart starting are moot at this point because we are dealing with a totally different mindset at the QB position.

Fitz will make a TON of difference to Leinart...I don't see how you could deny that.

That's not even taking into account Leinart vs. Warner in the total offense, where I've seen Matt a very large upgrade.


Oh I definitely think we are better off with Fitz in there as compared to BJ. That goes without saying. I just dont think the impact is going to be as big as you think it will be.

A differance? Yes. A TON of differance? No way. Not until we fix this line and get a running game.
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,547
Posts
5,407,922
Members
6,317
Latest member
Denmark
Top