I think the context of a signing needs to be taken in for every instance before we start making blanket "package deal" stipulations.
The CJ Henry signing isn't a package deal. Memphis supposedly has room for him and they don't have to use a scholarship on his spot. Sounds like a good deal for him that has high upside and hardly any downside. They might or might not get X from this and they might have themselves a basketball player out of it.
Of course JaRon, Kareem, and Brandon all went to different schools. We lost out on J'mison Morgan partially because he didn't want to follow Arthur's shoes whom he was rather close to and again that sucks for us. We might lose X to Memphis because of this, but I don't begrudge them signing CJ even though he previously committed to KU.
The issue I have is more of a Delonte Hill situation where you hire an AAU coach or "adviser" before the player has signed and then he signs where the hired gun goes.
Those who have issue with Mario's and his father's associations with KU are really clueless IMO and most likely bitter because their team didn't snag him or they lost to us in the Tournament.
Out of curiosity why do you think Chalmers wasn't a package deal? I do know his dad coached him in HS and played the game himself but other than his son being a McD's AA what qualified Ronnie Chalmers to be Director of Basketball OPS for Kansas? I thought it was pretty blatantly obvious that they hired Ronnie to help recruit mario so I'm curious what part of that deal I am missing?
As for CJ henry, remember the rumor for months now is CJ was going to Kansas where he'd play with his brother Xavier. Now it looks like Xavier follows him to Memphis. Their dad played at Kansas and Calipari was on staff at Kansas at that time. I looked at a Memphis board yesterday and right on that board they were discussing a rumor from a Kansas board that CJ Henry's dad was moving to Memphis to start a new job. If true I don't see how anybody can not think it's a package deal. I realize these days anybody can make up a rumor like that on a message board but even the Memphis fans were saying that local rumor seemed to confirm his dad had a new job in Memphis lined up. I don't know what the dad does now(think his name is Carl henry). Now if Xavier doesn't go to Memphis then I'll believe it's not a package deal but if he does I dont' see any reason to not think package deal?
In the case of Morgan that whole recruitment was crazy. Morgan picked LSU originally because his AAU coach was an LSU alum and got very tight with one of the assistant coaches at LSU. When they changed coaches they were pushing that assistant as Head coach, he didn't get the job and immediately Morgan wanted out of his LOI. Then Trent JOhnson decides while I've never met the guy, I want to retain that one assistant, and Morgan reconsiders. He goes back and forth with all sorts of rumors flying and winds up at UCLA. Now people think the AAU coach got an Adidas sponsorship for his AAU team out of it although someone on BRO reported recently that Morgan's old AAU team is playing the circuit this year with the same Reebok sponsorship they had before. But it wouldn't surprise me at all if later on it becomes a more lucrative Adidas deal. I never trusted Morgan would wind up at UCLA until he started classes, it was very apparent the people around him(AAU coach, HS coach, mom) all had angles in that situation. I'm quite surprised he wound up at UCLA.
The Rush brothers were never going to be a package deal they were a few years apart and had different reasons. Jaron was going to Kansas until he popped off about Roy Williams wound up at UCLA where he got in trouble for the stuff in HS. That stuff prevented Kareem from Going to Kansas because the NCAA said the guy was a kansas booster, so he went to Missouri. When Brandan came out Jaron offered to pay his way to Missouri(they had no rides left) but he chose Kansas. Brandan never had any involvement with the booster so there was never any problem with the NCAA like there was with Jaron and Kareem.
I do agree all situations are unique, what Davis is saying is the NCAA intends to switch the burden of proof from being on the NCAA to prove it's a package deal, to being on the college to prove it's not. If you hire someone connected to a recruit and get the recruit, within a certain time frame, you have to prove the hiring is legit. I think the defense will be that's impossible to prove, but I think it will reduce this sort of stuff.
The classic example is the USC situations. With both Hackett and Polee USC hired them without interviewing anybody else for the job. The jobs weren't even public, USC is a private institution and they claim they can hire without making the job opening public they have that right. in both cases they not only got the recruit out of it, they avoided having to use a scholarship on the recruit because he gets free tuition from his father working at USC. That's what made their deals so blatant they circumvented the scholarship limits in the process.
USC is currently recruiting a kid named Tyler Honeycutt, his assistant coach in HS is Shawn Bankhead, who played for Tim Floyd at Iowa State. And the rumor amongst So Cal recruiting "experts" is that Floyd has already offered Bankhead a job on his staff despite having no openings. The assumption is Gib Arnold will take a head coaching job next season(he's interviewed for several in the last 2 offseasons) and Floyd will promote guys and make room for Bankhead. And the reason most believe that's true is Floyd's recent history with hackett and Polee.
Until USC gets Honeycutt and hires Bankhead its all conjecture and right now it looks like Honeycutt is going to UCLA. But until he actually commits there's this situation everyone is watching about Shawn Bankhead. I think those are the situations the NCAA is really going after. 2 of the Memphis deals appear to fit that the one for Dennis and the one for Evans.