On Fred Wakefield--while I know that he's getting mauled in bull-rush situations, do you think he's doing okay in re-directing blockers on runs to his side? Do you think we'll have to dedicate a tight end on that side in pass pro? I know that zone-blocking systems like to use lighter, more agile blockers. Do you think that Wakefield has what it takes to at least be adequate in a zone-block scheme?
Wakefield has improved, from what I've seen, but he still plays too high and tends to bend at the waist, not the knees. This may prevent him from ever being a solid starter.
There are ways to protect a suspect tackle, to a point. Slide-protection can be used to slide the line toward the suspect tackle, a TE can release through a good rush DE, a RB can "chip" his way out of the backfield (assuming his protection responsibility drops into coverage) or, maybe the best way, you can be a complete, balanced offense, running the ball, mixing in three-step drops, throwing screens, keeping you offense out of 3rd & Obvious down & distances.
The Tackle-Zone (6 and 7 zone) is what Denver, Atlanta and Houston run and their lineman are typically lighter, more agile (and smart). The Cardinals are running the Inside-Zone and the Outside-Zone (a misnomer of sorts because, unless they get a particular defensive-front, they block it by pulling the uncovered lineman). The Inside-Zone (4 and 5 zone) is a north and south play, much more physical at the point-of-attack than the other zone-plays and you NEVER pull lineman.
Wakefield, in terms of running the ball, would do well with teams that run the Tackle-Zone. I do not know if he'll ever be a good run-blocking tackle in the scheme the Cardinals are using.
There is much more to say about this but the morning practice beckons...