Moss to Pack for Aaron Rodgers - trade is close

football karma

Michael snuggles the cap space
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Posts
15,245
Reaction score
14,299
picked it up at MSNBC.com sports--

interesting draft implications;

Raiders take somebody other than Russell -- Calvin Johnson?

Two qbs now to choose from starting at pick 2--

does this get Joe Thomas past both Det and Clev?

If C Johnson is gone -- does TB go Joe Thomas at #4?

Adrian Peterson available at #5?


I love the offseason
 

TheCardFan

Things have changed.
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
12,266
Reaction score
15,337
Location
Charlotte
No doubt they take Calvin Johson in that case, IMO.

They may be taking CJ regardless of moving Moss.

They have been trying to acquire QB's all offseason (Garcia/Plummer/Rodgers).
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
87,634
Reaction score
38,893
The worst part is poor Aaron Rodgers, he avoids having to be the guy to replace Brett Favre, but he has to play for the Raiders.

But yes they should pick Calvin Johnson if they make this deal.
 

trueherotillman

Registered
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Posts
137
Reaction score
0
Location
PHX
lane kiffin indicated that they would take Russell with the first pick. GB doesn't want to move Rodgers. KGB and a pick for Moss is more like it. i still say raiders keep moss and draft russell.
 

Pariah

H.S.
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
18
Location
The Aventine
whoa. If true, that means GB is once again in the market for a QB. Maybe they'd trade up to get Quinn?
 

TheCardFan

Things have changed.
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
12,266
Reaction score
15,337
Location
Charlotte
lane kiffin indicated that they would take Russell with the first pick. GB doesn't want to move Rodgers. KGB and a pick for Moss is more like it. i still say raiders keep moss and draft russell.

Don't believe what anyone says during this time of year...
 

Mitch

Crawled Through 5 FB Fields
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Posts
13,405
Reaction score
2,982
Location
Wrentham, MA
Yeah, Kiffin was gushing on the NFL Network yesterday following JaMarcus Russell's pro day workout.

I can't see the Raiders taking Rodgers.
 

Renz

An Army of One
Joined
May 10, 2003
Posts
13,078
Reaction score
2
Location
lat: 35.231 lon: -111.550
I hope Oakland plans on taking Jamarcus Russell. The draft needs to go like this:

1. OAK - Russell
2. DET - Quinn
3. CLE - Peterson
4. TB - C. Johnson
5. AZ - Joe Thomas

:thumbup:
 

Mitch

Crawled Through 5 FB Fields
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Posts
13,405
Reaction score
2,982
Location
Wrentham, MA
I hope Oakland plans on taking Jamarcus Russell. The draft needs to go like this:

1. OAK - Russell
2. DET - Quinn
3. CLE - Peterson
4. TB - C. Johnson
5. AZ - Joe Thomas

:thumbup:

I think this is the way it will go, Renz...you got it, man.
 

Gambit

First-Class Second-Rate Poster
Joined
Oct 5, 2006
Posts
3,298
Reaction score
0
Location
Houston, Texas
The worst part is poor Aaron Rodgers, he avoids having to be the guy to replace Brett Favre, but he has to play for the Raiders.

But yes they should pick Calvin Johnson if they make this deal.

If I'm Rodgers, I'd much rather actually play for a bad team that sitting on the bench behind the guy who won't let go.

'Tis better to reign in hell than to serve in heaven.
 

BullheadCardFan

Go for it
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2005
Posts
63,126
Reaction score
28,349
Location
Bullhead City, AZ
HARLAN SAYS MOSS TRADE NOT IMMINENT

Outgoing Packers CEO Bob Harlan, who has been more talkative than ever over the past few days, tells the Green Bay Press-Gazette that a deal for Raiders receiver Randy Moss is not close to happening.

Harlan bases his assessment on the fact that G.M. Ted Thompson left on Tuesday for a scouting trip, and has not phoned in to tell Harlan that a deal was close.

“If [a trade] was that close, [Thompson] would have called us by now,” Harlan said.

Of course, given that Harlan has been flapping his lips about the Moss situation for most of the past week, maybe the close-vested Thompson realized that giving Harlan a head's up was the equivalent of shouting the news from the middle of Times Square with a megaphone.

And the fact that Harlan didn't say something like, "I have no idea what you're talking about" or "We have no interest in Randy Moss" or "Randy Moss will be doing the Lambeau Leap over my dead body" tells us that something is going on -- and that at this point it's more likely a matter not of "if" but "when."

http://www.profootballtalk.com/rumormill.htm
 

BullheadCardFan

Go for it
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2005
Posts
63,126
Reaction score
28,349
Location
Bullhead City, AZ
This bit of info is interesting ...

WOULD MOSS TRADE OPEN DOOR FOR JOHNSON?

If, as now seems likely, the Oakland Raiders ship receiver Randy Moss to Green Bay in exchange for quarterback Aaron Rodgers, we believe that Georgia Tech receiver Calvin Johnson would become Oakland's primary target with the No. 1 overall pick in the draft.

Johnson is, in our opinion, a can't-miss prospect with a combination of size and speed and hands and, uncharacteristically at the receiver position, not a hint of a bad attitude.

So while it's a 50-50 proposition at best when burning a top-five pick on a potential franchise quarterback, Johnson's chances of becoming a long-term contributor are much greater, we believe.

And there's a wrinkle to all of this that we find very intriguing. Packers quarterback Brett Favre is pushing the team to acquire Moss. If Moss goes, the door is open for Johnson to be taken with the No. 1 overall pick in the draft.

Favre is represented by Bus Cook. Cook also is involved in the representation of Moss, and the Moss transaction depends in large part on Moss and his agents working out a restructured contract with Packers.

So if that gets done, then Johnson is poised to be the first guy off of the board.
His agent? Bus Cook.

We're not suggesting that Cook is trying to engineer the Moss trade so that Johnson will have a better shot at being the first overall pick. But the possibility of one client being the No. 1 selection in 2007 surely has at least entered the mind of the guy who surely has some influence over the extent to which Moss will be willing to accept the Packers' terms.

http://www.profootballtalk.com/rumormill.htm
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
87,634
Reaction score
38,893
If I'm Rodgers, I'd much rather actually play for a bad team that sitting on the bench behind the guy who won't let go.

'Tis better to reign in hell than to serve in heaven.

True and maybe he'd like being close to home(he's from Chico) but the Raiders are the worst run organization in the NFL right now, he might get
killed in that offense, ask Andrew Walter.
 

Denny Green Fan

Registered
Joined
Jul 14, 2005
Posts
1,964
Reaction score
188
If you was Millen who would you rather have? Joe Thomas and Stanton or Quinn and Staley?
 

Skkorpion

Grey haired old Bird
LEGACY MEMBER
Supporting Member
Joined
May 9, 2002
Posts
11,026
Reaction score
5
Location
Sun City, AZ
If I'm Rodgers, I'd much rather actually play for a bad team that sitting on the bench behind the guy who won't let go.

'Tis better to reign in hell than to serve in heaven.

Gambit, I always thought you were pretty sharp, but anybody who thinks living and working outside in Green Bay in winter is "serving in heaven" needs to seek help. :)
 

devilalum

Heavily Redacted
Joined
Jul 30, 2002
Posts
16,776
Reaction score
3,187
I can't wait to see Moss put up a goose egg the first time the thermometer drops below 20.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,389
Reaction score
29,775
Location
Gilbert, AZ
If you was Millen who would you rather have? Joe Thomas and Stanton or Quinn and Staley?

Thomas and Stanton. As long as Martz is the OC, he's going to refuse any "franchise" QB that you try and force on him, and get the QB killed while he's doing it.
 

Gambit

First-Class Second-Rate Poster
Joined
Oct 5, 2006
Posts
3,298
Reaction score
0
Location
Houston, Texas
Gambit, I always thought you were pretty sharp, but anybody who thinks living and working outside in Green Bay in winter is "serving in heaven" needs to seek help. :)

You're right, Green Bay in Winter is much more akin to Cocytus than to the Empyrean. Thanks for setting me straight. :)

So basically Rodgers has the option to serve in Cocytus, or go to rule in Oakland, which would be like having a giant 3-faced Al Davis chewing on you for eternity. :confused: (no, even I don't know what this is supposed to be).
 

Gandhi

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Posts
2,018
Reaction score
2,863
Location
Denmark
http://www.packerchatters.com/op-ed/view.php?id=1885

Nothing to do with the Moss trade.

Kevin Berry is on the block and the Cardinals, Cowboys, Redskins, Texans and Raiders are teams to that could use the big OT, and be trading partners.

If the Packers want to trade up to grab Peterson, Nick Barnett, Kevin Berry and their first round pick, where we may be able to take Levi Brown, could maybe be a fair trade.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,389
Reaction score
29,775
Location
Gilbert, AZ
http://www.packerchatters.com/op-ed/view.php?id=1885

Nothing to do with the Moss trade.



If the Packers want to trade up to grab Peterson, Nick Barnett, Kevin Berry and their first round pick, where we may be able to take Levi Brown, could maybe be a fair trade.

Who's Kevin Berry? Stats, Inc. doesn't have any information on him. Doesn't even list him on the Packers' roster. Neither does NFL.com. Oh, it's "Barry", with an "a". Here's his NFL.com player's page. Five-year veteran out of Arizona. Just a depth guy, it looks like. Didn't play at all last season. Doesn't even show up on their NFL.com roster.

Man, he's like the NFC version of Brandon Gorin, isn't he? I like Nick Barnett, but I'm not sure him, the 16th overall pick, and a guy who committed 5 penalties in 16 games with 1 start is really going to be worth the #5 overall pick.
 

JM88

Newbie
Joined
Feb 19, 2007
Posts
17
Reaction score
0
Who's Kevin Berry? Stats, Inc. doesn't have any information on him. Doesn't even list him on the Packers' roster. Neither does NFL.com. Oh, it's "Barry", with an "a". Here's his NFL.com player's page. Five-year veteran out of Arizona. Just a depth guy, it looks like. Didn't play at all last season. Doesn't even show up on their NFL.com roster.

He was on the injury reserve all season after a surgery. But yes he will probably not be more than a depth guy. He can play both tackle and guard and i believe he is better as a run blocker than pass blocker. He is pretty big (he has a weight issue i think) and has a lot of strength. I think one of the main reasons that Packers wants to get rid of him is that he isn't a good fit for the zone blocking scheme.

If anyone wants him i guess the price is a late second day draft pick. My guess would be either yours 7th rounder this year or a conditional '08 6th rounder based on Barry being on the roster after training camp.
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,563
Posts
5,408,110
Members
6,317
Latest member
Denmark
Top