Movie-A-Day #340: The Cider House Rules

nathan

ASFN Lifer
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
4,891
Reaction score
4
Location
Alexandria, VA
You must be registered for see images attach


Amazon.com essential video
In adapting his own novel The Cider House Rules for the screen, John Irving sacrificed at least some of the depth and detail that made his humanitarian themes resonate, while the film--directed with Scandinavian sobriety by Lasse Hallström--is often vague about the complex issues (abortion, incest, responsibility) that lie at its core. Allowing for this ambiguity (which is arguably intentional), the film retains much of what made Irving's novel so admired, and like Hallström's earlier feature What's Eating Gilbert Grape?, it's blessed with a generous, forgiving spirit toward the mistakes, foibles, and desires of its many engaging characters.
Central to the story (set during World War II) is Homer (Tobey Maguire), a young man raised in a Maine orphanage, where the ether-sniffing Dr. Larch (Michael Caine) rules with benevolent grace while performing safe but illegal abortions. To expand his horizons, Homer follows a young couple (Charlize Theron, Paul Rudd) to do fieldwork on an apple farm, where his innocent eyes are opened to the good and evil of the world--and to the realization that not all rules are steadfast in all situations. By the time Homer returns to the orphanage, The Cider House Rules--which features one of Caine's finest performances--is memorable more for its many charming and insightful moments than for any lasting dramatic impact. Is Homer fated to come full circle in his kindhearted journey? It's left to the viewer to decide. --Jeff Shannon
-------------------------------
This is one of my favorite movies. I think I've seen it at least five times. Michael Caine won a Best Supporting Actor Oscar (deservedly so) while Tobey Maguire is also pretty solid. It also won some sort of screenplay Oscar. I think this movie falls into the same underappreciated status that Shawshank Redemption had at one point, but unlike Shawshank it is not quite a masterpiece with Charlize Theron's acting being the biggest flaw. Still, this is a very good movie, one which I think should have won Best Picture over American Beauty in 2000.
 

Bada0Bing

Don't Stop Believin'
Joined
Feb 19, 2004
Posts
7,740
Reaction score
996
Location
Goodyear
nm132 said:
one which I think should have won Best Picture over American Beauty in 2000.
While I definitely don’t agree with this statement, (American Beauty is probably in my top 5 list of favorite movies) I thought this movie was excellent. The scenery was great and it was one of those movies that seemed to move slowly, but at the same time it flew by because you get so engrossed in the characters and the story.
 
Top