OMFG, it just hit me...

playstation

Selfless Service
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Posts
1,685
Reaction score
2
Location
Bay Area
with 99% certainty, next year our starting lineup will be:

nash (90/50/40 club, 10+ast)
bell (D, 40+% 3)
marion (20/10 club, top 20 in everything)
amare (god on earth?)
diaw (12/6/6 club, 50+% fg)

just look at that for a second...drool if you must. we're talkin 2 MVP talents, a second team all-nba talent, a 3rd team all-nba talent, and bruce bowen 2.0

i'm not even talking about TT, KT, barbosa, or anyone else, that's all up in the air, but those 5 are stayin i'm pretty sure.

diaw is going to come back with a money jumper, he pretty much had one already, but i'm talking corner 3 ability too. amare's already got this. bell was already as money as JoeJ was at the end of the year, he may be over 50% next year. nash and marion just need to continue being themselves.

all 5 guys will be able to hit 3's. anyone can go for 30 (including guys off the bench most likely). one can go for 50. we know stat & shawn will be dunking everywhere, but after the wcf maybe boris wants in too.

multiple playmakers, best running team in the league, unstoppable in half-court (finally), CLUTCH, battle-tested, and bell+marion+diaw=at least good defense. how do you stop this???

title FAVORITES??? you bet. we've had chances the past 2 years, but in either case it would have been 'stealing' one from the favorite. assuming health, won't be the case next year.

the best part? we're not 'small' anymore. 04-05 was 1-2-2-3-4, now we're at 1-2-3-4-4. considering there's only 2 real 5's left in the L, and they slow, we're set.

remember Jerry Sloans comment in 04-05? "this team destroys your will to win"...it's gonna get worse Jerry...

bold prediction: if healthy, next years team will post the highest offensive efficiency in NBA history (they were 3rd all time in 04-05) and score in the 115ppg range. you thought these last 2 years were a video game? you ain't seen nothin yet. 70? few teams even have the right to discuss...time for us to discuss.
 

Gaddabout

Plucky Comic Relief
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2004
Posts
16,043
Reaction score
11
Location
Gilbert
When Danny Manning signed in August of 94 (Colangelo signed him to a low one-year contract, making a somewhat unethical promise to take care of him the next season), multiple people were predicting the Suns would transform into the Harlem Globetrotters.

The Suns did, in fact, look like the Globetrotters on occasion, but then the curse set in. Manning's knee became a major problem. KJ's hamstrings were declared a public menace. Majerle's bulging disc nearly ended his career. Barkley was hurt and grew lazy and despondent. Richard Dumas and Ollie Miller proved to be much bigger risks than expected. All at times when it became impossible to recover, late-season or playoff injuries. The Rockets had Hakeem, and he, with Robert Horry and Mario Elie, became Suns killers.

It went downhill fast. Majerle for Hot Rod. Barkley for Horry and Cassell.

I make no predictions. I harbor no expectations. Emotionally, I can't afford it anymore. I just enjoy the seasons as the roll in and roll out.
 

mribnik

Registered User
Joined
Apr 24, 2003
Posts
1,769
Reaction score
0
Location
San Diego
Raja bell is a solid defender, but he is NOT Bruce Bowen.

I am equally excited about the prospects for next year though!
 

JWF

Veteran
Joined
May 10, 2006
Posts
178
Reaction score
0
mribnik said:
Raja bell is a solid defender, but he is NOT Bruce Bowen.

I am equally excited about the prospects for next year though!

True, but Bell, a this stage, is a better offensive player. I think Bell is a better overall player at this point in his career.
 

nowagimp

Registered User
Joined
Nov 2, 2005
Posts
3,912
Reaction score
0
Location
Gilbert, AZ
mribnik said:
Raja bell is a solid defender, but he is NOT Bruce Bowen.

I am equally excited about the prospects for next year though!

Yeah, Raja is more versatile than Bowen and will score 15ppg. The suns couldnt afford to play Bowen in the system, his offense is almost zero.
 
OP
OP
playstation

playstation

Selfless Service
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Posts
1,685
Reaction score
2
Location
Bay Area
Gaddabout said:
When Danny Manning signed in August of 94 (Colangelo signed him to a low one-year contract, making a somewhat unethical promise to take care of him the next season), multiple people were predicting the Suns would transform into the Harlem Globetrotters.

The Suns did, in fact, look like the Globetrotters on occasion, but then the curse set in. Manning's knee became a major problem. KJ's hamstrings were declared a public menace. Majerle's bulging disc nearly ended his career. Barkley was hurt and grew lazy and despondent. Richard Dumas and Ollie Miller proved to be much bigger risks than expected. All at times when it became impossible to recover, late-season or playoff injuries. The Rockets had Hakeem, and he, with Robert Horry and Mario Elie, became Suns killers.

It went downhill fast. Majerle for Hot Rod. Barkley for Horry and Cassell.

I make no predictions. I harbor no expectations. Emotionally, I can't afford it anymore. I just enjoy the seasons as the roll in and roll out.

hey, anything can happen from this point forward, but from where i'm standing RIGHT NOW, the outlook cannot be much better. also, everything i said i prefaced with 'assuming health', which is of course no small assumption.
 

simply_amare

Rookie
Joined
Nov 19, 2004
Posts
94
Reaction score
0
Location
Georgia,USA/Philippines
Raja bell is a solid defender, but he is NOT Bruce Bowen.

Very true! Cause Raja's better overall. Bowen is a one-dimensional player which only expends most of his energy on defense(not that there's anything wrong with it!) Raja does both or at least burns more calories on offense, too.
 

mribnik

Registered User
Joined
Apr 24, 2003
Posts
1,769
Reaction score
0
Location
San Diego
So are you guys trying to prove my point that Raja Bell isn't Bruce Bowen 2.0? The point is, that Raja Bell is a solid defender, but not even close to the level of Bruce Bowen IMO. He's physical, draws a lot of offensive fouls, and gets in the head of the opponent, but Bowen is still in another class IMO. Their 3pt%'s are pretty close, but that's because Bowen only takes that baseline 3. Raja can make it at a high percentage from anywhere. Raja shoots a higher percentage from the FT line, but that's not a huge advantage since he only shot 1.8 FT's a game this year.

Anyways, I would agree that Raja Bell is a better overall player, but that doesn't necessarily make him better. Having a guy on your team that can shut down Kobe Bryant (and Bell certainly cannot) is a big advantage. Regardless, referring to Bell as Bowen 2.0 is referring to his defensive abilities, which is not accurate, IMO.
 

Treesquid PhD

Pardon my Engrish
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Posts
4,844
Reaction score
105
Location
Gilbert
simply_amare said:
Very true! Cause Raja's better overall. Bowen is a one-dimensional player which only expends most of his energy on defense(not that there's anything wrong with it!) Raja does both or at least burns more calories on offense, too.

The main difference between Bowen and Bell on D is hype and leeway to cheat on defense and get away with it. This is something I assume Bell will have more leeway on from now on.
 

Treesquid PhD

Pardon my Engrish
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Posts
4,844
Reaction score
105
Location
Gilbert
mribnik said:
So are you guys trying to prove my point that Raja Bell isn't Bruce Bowen 2.0? The point is, that Raja Bell is a solid defender, but not even close to the level of Bruce Bowen IMO. He's physical, draws a lot of offensive fouls, and gets in the head of the opponent, but Bowen is still in another class IMO. Their 3pt%'s are pretty close, but that's because Bowen only takes that baseline 3. Raja can make it at a high percentage from anywhere. Raja shoots a higher percentage from the FT line, but that's not a huge advantage since he only shot 1.8 FT's a game this year.

Anyways, I would agree that Raja Bell is a better overall player, but that doesn't necessarily make him better. Having a guy on your team that can shut down Kobe Bryant (and Bell certainly cannot) is a big advantage. Regardless, referring to Bell as Bowen 2.0 is referring to his defensive abilities, which is not accurate, IMO.

this is where we buy into the hype,
If Kobe shoot 7-30 against Bowen it's a shut down
If Kobe shoots 7-30 against Bell it's an off night.

No one can shut Kobe down but Kobe.
 

MaoTosiFanClub

The problem
Joined
Oct 7, 2003
Posts
12,720
Reaction score
6,564
Location
Scottsdale, AZ
Treesquid said:
The main difference between Bowen and Bell on D is hype and leeway to cheat on defense and get away with it. This is something I assume Bell will have more leeway on from now on.
No, it's not as Bell is just as dirty as Bowen is. Bowen is a way better defensive player than Bell but I'd take Bell any day over him because he can do it on both ends and is much younger.
 
OP
OP
playstation

playstation

Selfless Service
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Posts
1,685
Reaction score
2
Location
Bay Area
mribnik said:
So are you guys trying to prove my point that Raja Bell isn't Bruce Bowen 2.0? The point is, that Raja Bell is a solid defender, but not even close to the level of Bruce Bowen IMO. He's physical, draws a lot of offensive fouls, and gets in the head of the opponent, but Bowen is still in another class IMO. Their 3pt%'s are pretty close, but that's because Bowen only takes that baseline 3. Raja can make it at a high percentage from anywhere. Raja shoots a higher percentage from the FT line, but that's not a huge advantage since he only shot 1.8 FT's a game this year.

Anyways, I would agree that Raja Bell is a better overall player, but that doesn't necessarily make him better. Having a guy on your team that can shut down Kobe Bryant (and Bell certainly cannot) is a big advantage. Regardless, referring to Bell as Bowen 2.0 is referring to his defensive abilities, which is not accurate, IMO.

raja's D is not at the level of bruce, who is the best on-ball backcourt defender in basketball. however, imo, raja is up there as well, surely top 10, many would say even higher. we all agree he's way better on the offensive end. I used the "2.0" comment not to refer to defensive capabilities but the whole package: a player known for defense but who's offense is very good too.

in that manner, he supercedes bowen, and is thus 2.0 in my book. defensively, certainly not bowen's peer, but close enough that a complete player comparison makes raja the superior.
 
OP
OP
playstation

playstation

Selfless Service
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Posts
1,685
Reaction score
2
Location
Bay Area
this isn't even the point of my post though, we know what bell is, and in our offense he fits like a glove, one that can propel us to heights the suns have not seen.

and now, he knows he is our heart and soul.

i still remember d'antoni's comments: in early october (pre-amare microfracture), dantoni said "we used to have 2 'stormers' in practice: guys that stomp off the court if they lose, in amare and steve. now we have 3 guys including raja"
 

mribnik

Registered User
Joined
Apr 24, 2003
Posts
1,769
Reaction score
0
Location
San Diego
Treesquid said:
this is where we buy into the hype,
If Kobe shoot 7-30 against Bowen it's a shut down
If Kobe shoots 7-30 against Bell it's an off night.

No one can shut Kobe down but Kobe.

Hype comes into play a bit I suppose, but the difference is, that Kobe struggles against Bowen much more than he does against Bell.

Against the Spurs this year, Kobe shot..
38.3%

Against the Suns, Kobe shot..
47.9%

Bell is certainly a solid defender, but he isn't in the class of Bowen, regardless of hype, and he probably isn't top 10 either (although I'd have to look at a list of players to determine that IMO). I'd say that we slightly overrate Bell's defense on this board, but not nearly to the extent that we did with Joe Johnson.
 
OP
OP
playstation

playstation

Selfless Service
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Posts
1,685
Reaction score
2
Location
Bay Area
mribnik said:
Hype comes into play a bit I suppose, but the difference is, that Kobe struggles against Bowen much more than he does against Bell.

Against the Spurs this year, Kobe shot..
38.3%

Against the Suns, Kobe shot..
47.9%

Bell is certainly a solid defender, but he isn't in the class of Bowen, regardless of hype, and he probably isn't top 10 either (although I'd have to look at a list of players to determine that IMO). I'd say that we slightly overrate Bell's defense on this board, but not nearly to the extent that we did with Joe Johnson.

wow

you do realize tim duncan plays for the spurs right? i'd think interior defense has something to do with it, especially if you watched the games, saw kobe knife to the hole with ease, then have difficulty finishing because of the towers in the middle.

also, to say raja is not top 10, i mean, c'mon, thats sad. lead the league in charges, ginobili calls his agent all pissed off, raja suspended and kobe gets 50 (other 6 games he avg's 24.2ppg), and btw, i don't think defense on kobe is the sole determinant of ones ability to play D...
 

Yuma

Suns are my Kryptonite!
Joined
Jan 3, 2003
Posts
22,582
Reaction score
12,356
Location
Laveen, AZ
If Kurt Thomas is healthy, I'm willing to bet he starts over Diaw. Reason being, Diaw off the bench can add the ball handling we need when Nash is out. D'Antoni started Kurt whenever he's been healthy. I don't see why he'd go away from that now. ;)
 

Gaddabout

Plucky Comic Relief
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2004
Posts
16,043
Reaction score
11
Location
Gilbert
Bowen can afford to extend himself with the Spurs frontline. Lots of players would improve their reputation as defenders with the Spurs frontline. Bowen is still tops, but he does have an advantage over other players with similar reputations.
 

devilalum

Heavily Redacted
Joined
Jul 30, 2002
Posts
16,776
Reaction score
3,187
Gaddabout said:
When Danny Manning signed in August of 94 (Colangelo signed him to a low one-year contract, making a somewhat unethical promise to take care of him the next season), multiple people were predicting the Suns would transform into the Harlem Globetrotters.

The Suns did, in fact, look like the Globetrotters on occasion, but then the curse set in. Manning's knee became a major problem. KJ's hamstrings were declared a public menace. Majerle's bulging disc nearly ended his career. Barkley was hurt and grew lazy and despondent. Richard Dumas and Ollie Miller proved to be much bigger risks than expected. All at times when it became impossible to recover, late-season or playoff injuries. The Rockets had Hakeem, and he, with Robert Horry and Mario Elie, became Suns killers.

It went downhill fast. Majerle for Hot Rod. Barkley for Horry and Cassell.

I make no predictions. I harbor no expectations. Emotionally, I can't afford it anymore. I just enjoy the seasons as the roll in and roll out.

They were the Globetrotters until Manning blew out his knee during practice over the All Star break.
 

nowagimp

Registered User
Joined
Nov 2, 2005
Posts
3,912
Reaction score
0
Location
Gilbert, AZ
mribnik said:
So are you guys trying to prove my point that Raja Bell isn't Bruce Bowen 2.0? The point is, that Raja Bell is a solid defender, but not even close to the level of Bruce Bowen IMO. He's physical, draws a lot of offensive fouls, and gets in the head of the opponent, but Bowen is still in another class IMO. Their 3pt%'s are pretty close, but that's because Bowen only takes that baseline 3. Raja can make it at a high percentage from anywhere. Raja shoots a higher percentage from the FT line, but that's not a huge advantage since he only shot 1.8 FT's a game this year.

Anyways, I would agree that Raja Bell is a better overall player, but that doesn't necessarily make him better. Having a guy on your team that can shut down Kobe Bryant (and Bell certainly cannot) is a big advantage. Regardless, referring to Bell as Bowen 2.0 is referring to his defensive abilities, which is not accurate, IMO.

Bowen can play aggressively on the perimeter because he has one of the best shot blockers in the league backing him up. With no shot blocker(as in the suns) he wouldnt be able to overplay his man on the perimeter, and his man would shoot better. When Bowens man bests him off the dribble, Tim Duncan is always waiting along with other good team defenders.

Larry Bird was a horrible defender, but Mchale and Parrish were always there when his man blew by him. The value of having TD back you up on D has been IGNORED in this comparison.
 
OP
OP
playstation

playstation

Selfless Service
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Posts
1,685
Reaction score
2
Location
Bay Area
Yuma said:
If Kurt Thomas is healthy, I'm willing to bet he starts over Diaw. Reason being, Diaw off the bench can add the ball handling we need when Nash is out. D'Antoni started Kurt whenever he's been healthy. I don't see why he'd go away from that now. ;)

semantics. you know what, the 5 i listed will be the 5 that play the last 5 minutes, and i'd still say diaw starts. the diaw we saw while KT was healthy is not the same as the diaw now, much less the one in november.
 

Goldfield

Formally known as BEERZ
Joined
Sep 13, 2002
Posts
10,502
Reaction score
2,316
Location
ASFN
mribnik said:
Hype comes into play a bit I suppose, but the difference is, that Kobe struggles against Bowen much more than he does against Bell.

Against the Spurs this year, Kobe shot..
38.3%

Against the Suns, Kobe shot..
47.9%

Bell is certainly a solid defender, but he isn't in the class of Bowen, regardless of hype, and he probably isn't top 10 either (although I'd have to look at a list of players to determine that IMO). I'd say that we slightly overrate Bell's defense on this board, but not nearly to the extent that we did with Joe Johnson.
%'s are crap when compairing to the Suns. Our system gives everyone including the other team better stats...
 

Goldfield

Formally known as BEERZ
Joined
Sep 13, 2002
Posts
10,502
Reaction score
2,316
Location
ASFN
nowagimp said:
Bowen can play aggressively on the perimeter because he has one of the best shot blockers in the league backing him up. With no shot blocker(as in the suns) he wouldnt be able to overplay his man on the perimeter, and his man would shoot better. When Bowens man bests him off the dribble, Tim Duncan is always waiting along with other good team defenders.

Larry Bird was a horrible defender, but Mchale and Parrish were always there when his man blew by him. The value of having TD back you up on D has been IGNORED in this comparison.
VERY True...
 

Goldfield

Formally known as BEERZ
Joined
Sep 13, 2002
Posts
10,502
Reaction score
2,316
Location
ASFN
Diaw & Amare are gunna pick & roll the NBA to death.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
552,858
Posts
5,403,469
Members
6,315
Latest member
SewingChick65
Top