To my surprise Vince is saying he'll take it if they offer it. I wouldn't, you don't win an award 5 years later it just cheapens the award.
I can't believe people are commending Bush for this, he didn't admit to anything, he used legal speak to avoid saying why he's forfeiting it, and he's only forfeiting it because he doesn't want them to strip him. Robert Smith said on ESPN this morning that he hears other Heisman winners on the committee told Bush he should forfeit it because if he didn't, they'd end up stripping him and it would look better if he gave it up voluntarily.
Ironically it's very similar to a school getting caught breaking NCAA rules and then self penalizing so they can publicly say we took this so seriously we took our own penalties instead of waiting for the NCAA ruling. They're not doing it because they take the rules seriously, they're doing it to try and get leniency from the NCAA. Bush is trying to get leniency from the Heisman committee so they won't come out against him.
Charles White said if OJ didn't forfeit his Heisman when he got on trial for murder, why should Bush, OJ's was much worse. Completely missed the point, there is no Heisman rule that says if you're charged with murder 20 years after you win it, you're not eligible to keep the Heisman. There IS a Heisman rule that says very clearly in order to be eligible to win the award, you have to have been NCAA eligible, and Bush wasn't.