Factually inaccurate. Just because somebody wrote it on a message board doesn't make it true.
He gave up 4 completions on 6 targets for 66 yards and 1TD yesterday alone.
He was our lowest graded defender at 36.7.
I was wrong on the number of catches. Rewatched the game today. He was covering McLaurin on 37 pass attempts. Of the 37 passes, 7 went to McLaurin and 4 were caught.
1. Playing a bit off coverage. Quick slant ~8 yard catch. No help in middle of the field.
2. Defense playing soft to run our the first half with 39 seconds. Another quick slant. 8 yard reception. What looked like man I think was actually zone and Murphys territory.
3. 7 yard slant and stumbled forward a few more. This one was all on peterson.
4. Short slant towards middle of the field. Looks like peterson was staying on top. Before the ball was snapped Hicks ran up to fake blitz, left the middle of the field wide open, unfortunately thats exactly where McLaurin was headed. Baker took a bad angle and touchdown.
Other notable plays. McLaurin got behind peterson but pass didn't go that way. Also, peterson had great coverage on the play Reddick got the sack. Qb never took his eyes off McLaurin. Coverage sack.
Read into it however you want but thats my unprofessional analysis. The only catches he gave up were quick slants. 1 looked to be zone which could have gone against Murphy. 1 had no help in the middle of the field. 1 McLaurin just made a good play. And finally hicks was out of position or it would have been a 5 yard gain.
After giving up zero catches in week 1 and only giving up a couple quick slant in week 2, id say he's off to a good start.
Would some of you guys prefer he was like sherman and covered opposing teams no2 and no3 wrs? I mean Hopkins had 15 freaking catches vs the 9ers. Where was sherman? Peterson is a special talent and HOF player and it looks like he's still got it to me. Lot of games left to play, but he's done his job.
Sent from my SM-G988U using Tapatalk