Quick Poll - Raider Trade Proposition

Should Cards accept[Raiders 2019 1.4 & 2.3 plus a 2020 conditional R1] for [Cards 1.1 & 3.1]

  • yes, gives us an extra 1 next year and a second high 2 this year for our R3 thisbyear

    Votes: 10 38.5%
  • No, doesn't

    Votes: 16 61.5%

  • Total voters
    26

SissyBoyFloyd

Pawnee, Skidi Clan
Joined
Feb 1, 2012
Posts
5,077
Reaction score
2,384
Location
Mesa, AZ
simple y or n vote on raider's offering 2020 conditional 1st (highest not in top 10), 2019 1.4 and 2.3 for Cards' 2019 1.1 and 3.1


sorry for messy text in poll. it cut off 2nd choice. it won't let me edit for some reason.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
SissyBoyFloyd

SissyBoyFloyd

Pawnee, Skidi Clan
Joined
Feb 1, 2012
Posts
5,077
Reaction score
2,384
Location
Mesa, AZ
yes definitely, if we aren't taking Murray, we still get a top 3 player or can still trade back and get even more.
 

Jetstream Green

Kool Aid with a touch of vodka
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
29,476
Reaction score
16,649
Location
San Antonio, Texas
I voted yes because it might ensure we do not draft Murray who is really starting to seem like a colossal bust by his behavior since the draft process which I ironically no longer have concerns about his physical ability... has he done one thing right in a interview or anything for that matter since entering the draft
 

LoyaltyisaCurse

IF AND WHEN HEALTHY...
Joined
Aug 10, 2004
Posts
53,873
Reaction score
19,668
Location
CA
simple y or n vote on raider's offering 2020 conditional 1st (highest not in top 10), 2019 1.4 and 2.3 for Cards' 2019 1.1 and 3.1


sorry for messy text in poll. it cut off 2nd choice. it won't let me edit for some reason.
It would need to be at least two of those 1st picks THIS DRAFT + what you propose...possibly three of those 4 top picks this year.
 

ARZCardinals

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Posts
4,151
Reaction score
699
Location
Behind you
Always got to ask yourself - is the player you can take at 1 a generational talent you could live with some other team taking.
Never forget the Suggs trade
Cards got nothing - well they got Suggs 15 years later on the last year of his career
Ravens got a HOF career - dominant player and a Super Bowl
 

Delmar M Lewis

All Star
Joined
Nov 25, 2018
Posts
889
Reaction score
401
Location
Webb City Mo.
I voted yes because it might ensure we do not draft Murray who is really starting to seem like a colossal bust by his behavior since the draft process which I ironically no longer have concerns about his physical ability... has he done one thing right in a interview or anything for that matter since entering the draft
Mine is both physical as well as non participation in the Combine Pro Day etc. And now skipping a charity event (no matter ) the excuse just Screams I dont Care I have baseball with its guaranteed contract if you dont like what I'm doing so Screw You Football Idiots
 

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
25,437
Reaction score
18,325
Location
The Giant Toaster
Not enough value for #1 overall.. Its a terrible idea.

But aren’t people saying they’d move back to 4 for 27 and a 2nd? That first next year should be much higher than 27. Yeah giving up a third sucks but it’s still better value than other trade scenarios Cards fans have supported.
 
Top