4.37how often do you think that will happen? 3 times next year? he’s not a blazer and I don’t care how high he can jump. 6’1 DB will win.
4.37how often do you think that will happen? 3 times next year? he’s not a blazer and I don’t care how high he can jump. 6’1 DB will win.
how often do you think that will happen? 3 times next year? he’s not a blazer and I don’t care how high he can jump. 6’1 DB will win.
DeSean Jackson is 5 inches taller than Rondale. That's like saying Stafford isn't significantly taller than Kyler.
Not factoring in size for Rondale seems pretty silly to me. The only successful NFL receiver under 5'8" has been Cole Beasley, and he is barely under 5'8". That's it. If being 5'7" wasn't an issue, you would think there would be other 5'7" receivers with short arms and small hands out there, but there aren't.
every NFL player will tell you that you never run a 40 yard dash in the NFL. I’m talking twitch, quickness. Football playing speed.He's not a blazer? He runs sub 4.3.
every NFL player will tell you that you never run a 40 yard dash in the NFL. I’m talking twitch, quickness. Football playing speed.
After watching him on bubble screens and end around last year, color me not impressed. I didn’t see him blowing by people.
I think Moore has talent. But 5’7 is REALLY short. You’re trotting out guys as examples of short guys that succeeded and they’re still TWO INCHES TALLER than Moore. The only guys his size or shorter that really had success that come to mind are mjd and sproles - both runningbacks.I don't really get this.
What's better? A 5'10" with a 32" vertical jump or a 5'7" receiver with a 40" vertical jump?
Steve Smith was 5'9". Wes Welker was 5'9". Does 2" really make all the difference?
he actually comps well to Barry Sanders based on measurables...also a RBI think Moore has talent. But 5’7 is REALLY short. You’re trotting out guys as examples of short guys that succeeded and they’re still TWO INCHES TALLER than Moore. The only guys his size or shorter that really had success that come to mind are mjd and sproles - both runningbacks.
Have you seen him this year? He is in great shape, and gained more muscle. I am predicting he will a pro bowl caliber perfomer!After seeing him last year, what is his potential as a starter with the Cards? Was it a mistake to draft him? Who in this draft would you say compares most to him and where would he be ranked in this coming draft?
Rondale Moore? That could hinder him rather than help. He was always in great shape. Size will never be to his benefit, and getting too buff can lead to injuries to WRs--ask David Boston. I'm not saying this will happen, just that it's no guarantee of success for RM. He does have a lousy injury record going back to college, though, so we shouldn't expect too much.Have you seen him this year? He is in great shape, and gained more muscle. I am predicting he will a pro bowl caliber perfomer!
Rondale Moore? That could hinder him rather than help. He was always in great shape. Size will never be to his benefit, and getting too buff can lead to injuries to WRs--ask David Boston. I'm not saying this will happen, just that it's no guarantee of success for RM. He does have a lousy injury record going back to college, though, so we shouldn't expect too much.
That'd be a pretty realistic T-shirtYou should have "We shouldn't expect too much" printed on a T shirt
Rondale is going to be great this year. As is Zaven Collins.
That'd be a pretty realistic T-shirt
I'm glad you think RM and ZC will be great this year. Well, I should say "hope," because that's all it is. I hope so, too! I've just not seen anything to expect it to be so yet, and certainly no proof to make it the certainty you state.
Okay. That's your opinion, and I hope your opinion is correct. Or, better, that you're underselling them even. But, for me, it's only hope.It's not hope. Marco Wilson would be hope.
I've seen enough from Moore and Collins (especially Moore) to feel confident in a greater than 50% chance both are upgrades this year at the very least.
Agreed. Rondale can't be the guy on the shallow crosser like he was against Green Bay. Kyler's propensity to be high coupled with his small catch radius is a recipe for disaster.The key for Rondale is Kyler.
Is he going to trust Rondale like he did Kirk? Kirk wasn't the biggest guy but Kyler still trusted him on certain throws down the field.
Kyler has to trust Rondale. However, with Rondale's smaller catch radius, I think Kyler is going to have to be even more pinpoint on downfield passes.
Moore has actually always been built for his size with some muscle definition, I doubt he looks much different than last season in comparison... dude is noted for his insane squats max coming out of collegexc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
The key for Rondale is Kyler.
Is he going to trust Rondale like he did Kirk? Kirk wasn't the biggest guy but Kyler still trusted him on certain throws down the field.
Kyler has to trust Rondale. However, with Rondale's smaller catch radius, I think Kyler is going to have to be even more pinpoint on downfield passes.
Yep, good analysis.The key for Rondale is Kyler.
Is he going to trust Rondale like he did Kirk? Kirk wasn't the biggest guy but Kyler still trusted him on certain throws down the field.
Kyler has to trust Rondale. However, with Rondale's smaller catch radius, I think Kyler is going to have to be even more pinpoint on downfield passes.
I always found Kirks catch radius to be lacking a bit. Quite a few balls that it looked like he should have been able to get that he didn't.I'm not sure I agree on the smaller catch radius thing.
On paper Kirk has longer arms and a theoretically better catch radius. But I think Moore wins through much better agility and athleticism. That catch against the Niners where Moore catches the ball out of bounds on his tip toes at full extension...Kirk isn't catching that.
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
And Isabella would have never been able to complete his route to have a chance of catching that lolI'm not sure I agree on the smaller catch radius thing.
On paper Kirk has longer arms and a theoretically better catch radius. But I think Moore wins through much better agility and athleticism. That catch against the Niners where Moore catches the ball out of bounds on his tip toes at full extension...Kirk isn't catching that.
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Moore was pretty damn explosive early in the year when teams didn't squat down on his routes. Having Hollywood should mean that they won't be able to this year.That'd be a pretty realistic T-shirt
I'm glad you think RM and ZC will be great this year. Well, I should say "hope," because that's all it is. I hope so, too! I've just not seen anything to expect it to be so yet, and certainly no proof to make it the certainty you state.