Nothing wrong with zeroing in on Thomas or any other OT.
However, in keeping with the Green "best player" philosophy (which, despite our doldrums, has I think served us well), we should be zeroing in on the top players in the draft and then slotting them where they should be properly ranked.
If you believe the media, a few high-profile skill players like Quinn and Peterson figure to be ranked higher and should be in high demand.
Assuming the Cards draft in the top 3, this might be one of those years where they trade down - but only if the deal is sweet enough and only to a point where they can get the guy they want (whether it be Thomas, Podlzuski or possibly a really talented CB or S).
Also - as we learned from the Pace/Johnson trade-down experience - there's a threshhold below which top talent falls off. If we're to trade out of our top pick, it should not be so far that we drop below the blue-chip talent range.
What you hope for is that a LT like Thomas (a) fits within our definition of "blue chip" talent and (b) we can move to somewhere around #6 - #10 and still get him.
Or - There is so much talent-depth at LT that we can still pick up a stud late in the first or even in the high second round.
Of course, the danger in picking Best Athlete is that we sit on our hands in free agency re the OL and then bypass LT in the draft (because the right guy wasn't there for us at the right time). There has to be built into the equation a mechanism where we get at least one more offensive lineman who can help us.
Note - This may mean identifying free agent linemen who, while they're not perfect, are the type of journeymen whom the Card scouts and coaching staff feel could at least do the job to minimum NFL standards (i.e. better than we've got now) if you signed 5 of them straight across. At least that way, we wouldn't be vulnerable and leading from weakness going into the draft.