Seahawks intend to shop Jackson

BACH

Superbowl, Homeboy!
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
6,027
Reaction score
1,626
Location
Expat in Kuala Lumpur
http://www.thenewstribune.com/sports/story/6389427p-5698815c.html

Seahawks intend to shop Jackson

MIKE SANDO; The News Tribune
Published: February 25th, 2007 01:00 AM

INDIANAPOLIS – What might receiver Darrell Jackson return in a trade? The Seahawks plan to find out.
The decision to shop Jackson stems from a long-simmering contract dispute and lingering distrust over the handling of a 2005 knee injury, sources have said.

While the organization does not consider the relationship beyond repair, the team would prefer to trade him for a draft choice.

Seahawks president Tim Ruskell and coach Mike Holmgren, speaking at the NFL scouting combine, declined to comment on the team’s plans for Jackson, other than to say he remains under contract.

The team has not yet shopped Jackson or informed his agents of its plans.

“Darrell would love to retire as a Seahawk,” agent Brian Mooney said, “but we are unsure what the Seahawks have in mind.”

It remains unclear what the 28-year-old might bring in a trade.

There was no strong consensus among general managers polled anonymously at the combine. But given Jackson’s relatively high salary for 2007 ($3.25 million) and recent injury problems, the Seahawks might not receive a first-day pick in return, they said.

The evidence is mixed.

While the Seahawks sent a first-round choice to New England for receiver Deion Branch, a former Super Bowl MVP without a 1,000-yard season, Philadelphia acquired former first-round choice Donte’ Stallworth from New Orleans for a conditional fourth-round pick and linebacker Mark Simoneau.

Green Bay traded Javon Walker to Denver for a second-round pick. Denver acquired a much higher first-round pick in exchange for Ashley Lelie.

Jackson has considerably better career numbers than any of those receivers. He is also under contract, whereas Walker was looking for a lucrative new deal.

Markets can be difficult to predict because it takes only one team willing to pay a high price. The upcoming draft is considered strong for receivers, but the free-agent crop lacks star appeal. Jackson is an established player known for his quickness.

Jackson was leading the NFL in touchdowns last season when a turf-toe injury forced him to miss the final three games. The injury prevented Jackson from achieving his third 1,000-yard season in four years and the fourth overall.

Jackson still led the Seahawks with 63 catches for 956 yards and 10 touchdowns. He had six plays of at least 40 yards. Jackson set a franchise record with 87 catches in 2004. He has at least 60 catches five times in seven NFL seasons.

But trouble arose in March 2004 when former Seahawks president Bob Whitsitt allegedly shorted Jackson on a contract offer. Jackson said he signed the deal anyway at the urging of his father, who has since died. Whitsitt has dismissed the charge as preposterous, while Ruskell has resisted honoring a promise that a predecessor denies making.

The dispute has escalated ever since, with the Seahawks and Jackson’s agents exchanging a series of blunt letters, sources said.

When Ruskell became Seahawks president in February 2005, one of his first moves was to issue a letter to players outlining his expectations. He urged full participation in the team’s offseason program, including minicamps, but Jackson let it be known he would honor his contract but nothing more. Jackson subsequently skipped the voluntary portions of minicamps.

The relationship soured further after Jackson suffered a knee injury during an Oct. 2, 2005, game at Washington.

Jackson had bruised the knee earlier and experienced pain following a Sept. 25 game against Arizona. He suffered cartilage damage against the Redskins, raising questions in his mind about whether he should have been on the field at all, sources said.

The damage did not show up on initial tests. The team recommended rest. Holmgren avoided giving a timetable other than to say he thought it would be “shorter more than longer” after speaking with Jackson. The team ruled out Jackson for the next game.

Jackson, acting on the advice of Florida-based agents Mooney and Kendall Almerico, sought a second opinion from Dr. John Uribe, a prominent Miami orthopedist known for treating pro athletes.

Jackson underwent surgery to repair his right knee’s lateral meniscus, which consists of cartilage on the outer side of the knee.

He wondered if the team was trying to rush him back. The team resented the implication.

Jackson missed the next nine games, returning in time for the playoffs. He caught 20 passes for 268 yards and two touchdowns in three playoff games, leading the team in each category (Jerramy Stevens also caught two touchdown passes).

Jackson underwent a second procedure on the knee after the season. He missed minicamps and training camp, all while maintaining he would be ready for the opener. He returned for the opener; his late catch-and-run helped the Seahawks beat Detroit, 9-6.

But the team was already preparing for life without him.

The Seahawks had shipped a 2006 third-round pick to Minnesota after signing Vikings receiver Nate Burleson, a restricted free agent. Ruskell followed that deal by sending a 2007 first-round choice to New England for Branch shortly after the 2006 opener.

D.J. Hackett flashed starting potential last season, setting career highs with 45 catches for 610 yards and four touchdowns. The team is expected to retain Hackett’s rights by making one of the higher qualifying offers under rules for restricted free agents.

Ruskell also has expressed hope for Ben Obomanu, a 2006 seventh-round choice who spent last season on the practice squad. The team added Obomanu to its active roster in the playoffs, when Jackson was struggling to overcome the toe injury.

Bobby Engram may be another option, although he is scheduled to become a free agent March 2.

Jackson has three years remaining on a six-year, $25 million deal. His remaining salaries are $3.25 million, 4 million and $4.75 million. The deal included an $8 million signing bonus. One-sixth of the bonus counts against the salary cap each year. But if the Seahawks traded Jackson for a 2006 draft choice, the final three years of prorated bonus would accelerate, resulting in a $4 million hit.

Jackson’s contract would count $4.58 million against the cap if he were to remain on the team.
 

Diamondback Jay

Psalms 23:1
Joined
Feb 28, 2004
Posts
4,910
Reaction score
1
Location
Mesa
Not surprising by any means.. After spending what they did on Burleson, and giving up a first for Branch, Jackson was clearly the odd man out.

I'm not sure what they can expect to recieve from him. I'd imagine a third, to replace the one they lost with Burleson, should do the trick. With Jackson's knee injury history and the fact that he drops an unreasonable amount of balls, them thinking they could get a first for him is a bit hasty. I think even a second is a bit much.
 

SeaChicken

The Other Bird
Joined
Sep 9, 2003
Posts
688
Reaction score
0
Location
Los Angeles, California
Not surprising by any means.. After spending what they did on Burleson, and giving up a first for Branch, Jackson was clearly the odd man out.

I'm not sure what they can expect to recieve from him. I'd imagine a third, to replace the one they lost with Burleson, should do the trick. With Jackson's knee injury history and the fact that he drops an unreasonable amount of balls, them thinking they could get a first for him is a bit hasty. I think even a second is a bit much.

I'm not sure where you read that they were hoping for a first rounder. I think the article said something more along the lines of "first day" which sounds about right.
 

Diamondback Jay

Psalms 23:1
Joined
Feb 28, 2004
Posts
4,910
Reaction score
1
Location
Mesa
Twas hypothetical. I honestly don't know what the Seahawks are asking for in return..
 

football karma

Michael snuggles the cap space
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Posts
15,204
Reaction score
14,150
Good -- I hope he leaves Seattle tommorrow, if not tonight

Jackson has killed the Cardinals in the past. In addition, in watching the Hawks this past year, even with Hasselbeck and Alexander, their offense just didnt look the same without him. Jackson is the only wideout on that team that scares me.
 

PJ1

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 21, 2002
Posts
12,143
Reaction score
5,201
Location
Nashville TN.
Good -- I hope he leaves Seattle tommorrow, if not tonight

Jackson has killed the Cardinals in the past. In addition, in watching the Hawks this past year, even with Hasselbeck and Alexander, their offense just didnt look the same without him. Jackson is the only wideout on that team that scares me.

I am sure Rolle is happy. Seem to remember Jackson making him look like a fool in a game last year.
 

SeaChicken

The Other Bird
Joined
Sep 9, 2003
Posts
688
Reaction score
0
Location
Los Angeles, California
Good -- I hope he leaves Seattle tommorrow, if not tonight

Jackson has killed the Cardinals in the past. In addition, in watching the Hawks this past year, even with Hasselbeck and Alexander, their offense just didnt look the same without him. Jackson is the only wideout on that team that scares me.

Actually, we were without Jackson 9 games the year before and were undefeated during that stretch. Last year's offensive problems had much more to do with the offensive line constantly shuffling than it had to do with Jackson. If they trade Jackson, it just moves him out of D.J. Hackett's way. Hackett is a STUD. Remember the name.
 

Mulli

...
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2004
Posts
52,529
Reaction score
4,601
Location
Generational
Is Jackson the receiver that runs his routes too close to the sideline that Madden is constantly pointing out?
 

Trey

Registered
Joined
Apr 6, 2005
Posts
480
Reaction score
0
Location
Birth to 32, Phoenix. Now, enemy territory.
Is Jackson the receiver that runs his routes too close to the sideline that Madden is constantly pointing out?

Yep. And on top of that he has trouble staying healthy. And on top of that, he goes through stretches where it doesn't seem like he can catch anything.

Yet it is kind of funny how quickly Seattle went from not having a WR other than Jackson, to having 3 other options (Branch, Hackett, Burleson), thus making Jackson tradeable.
 

MigratingOsprey

Thank You Paul!
Joined
Jul 20, 2003
Posts
13,871
Reaction score
6,748
Location
Goodyear
i'm mixed on this as Jackson has been a proven fit in this offense - his problem remains reliability - he's aging, has had a slew of injuries and will drop ball and disappear for stretches

but when he's on he can flat out torch opponents

if they get a first day pick for him i'd probably be content to see him go - not because I don't like him, but because i question his reliability, his constant contract talk and I like the other WRs on the team
 

SeaChicken

The Other Bird
Joined
Sep 9, 2003
Posts
688
Reaction score
0
Location
Los Angeles, California
i'm mixed on this as Jackson has been a proven fit in this offense - his problem remains reliability - he's aging, has had a slew of injuries and will drop ball and disappear for stretches

but when he's on he can flat out torch opponents

if they get a first day pick for him i'd probably be content to see him go - not because I don't like him, but because i question his reliability, his constant contract talk and I like the other WRs on the team

Well said, MO. Those are my sentiments exactly. If for some reason they can't get a trade done on him, I wouldn't cry about that either.
 

Skkorpion

Grey haired old Bird
LEGACY MEMBER
Supporting Member
Joined
May 9, 2002
Posts
11,026
Reaction score
5
Location
Sun City, AZ
Seahawks got screwed out of their Super Bowl shot by the referees. Then, last year, they overcame numerous critical injuries and still made the playoffs. Very impressive and unappreciated league-wide.

But their window of opportunity is closing. 2007 may be their last shot before rebuilding.
 

nurnay

whatever
Joined
May 4, 2005
Posts
1,508
Reaction score
0
Location
Chico, CA
i'm mixed on this as Jackson has been a proven fit in this offense - his problem remains reliability - he's aging, has had a slew of injuries and will drop ball and disappear for stretches

but when he's on he can flat out torch opponents

By the sounds of that, I would think that Jackson must drive Seahawks fans crazy. Injuries, drops, disappearing in games... not great qualities. :confused:
 

MigratingOsprey

Thank You Paul!
Joined
Jul 20, 2003
Posts
13,871
Reaction score
6,748
Location
Goodyear
he does drive you nuts - but he's a fairly fun guy to watch and as I said, if he's on he'll torch you
 

vinnymac

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Mar 24, 2005
Posts
3,022
Reaction score
0
sounds like green bay might have another reciever for brett farve. What better place for Jackson to go than to the packers.
 

vinnymac

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Mar 24, 2005
Posts
3,022
Reaction score
0
another team comes to mind, the houston texans need another wide out. Just the thing Carr needs.
 

SeaChicken

The Other Bird
Joined
Sep 9, 2003
Posts
688
Reaction score
0
Location
Los Angeles, California
sounds like green bay might have another reciever for brett farve. What better place for Jackson to go than to the packers.

Yeah, he could re-join Koren Robinson. :( Seriously though, Ted Thompson is their GM and he used to be with Seattle so he's very familiar with Jackson. Would be a good fit.
 
Top