Somers: Fitzgerald, Cards No Closer to New Deal

AzWins23

Registered User
Joined
Aug 25, 2002
Posts
2,031
Reaction score
0
Location
Parma,Ohio
http://www.azcentral.com/sports/card...cards0228.html

Fitzgerald, Cards no closer to new deal

Kent Somers
The Arizona Republic
Feb. 27, 2008 09:54 PM

It appears the Cardinals will enter the waters of free agency with a large anchor attached to their legs.

NFL free agency begins at 10 p.m. Thursday, and the club is not close to reaching an agreement to restructure the contract of receiver Larry Fitzgerald, whose $14.6 million salary promises to restrict the Cardinals' movement in free agency.

The two sides remain apart on years and money, according to sources. The Cardinals' original offer was a six-year deal, while Fitzgerald's agent, Eugene Parker, prefers a four-year term. Under Parker's deal, the fourth year included a huge salary, which would force the sides to return to the bargaining table after three years.

Fitzgerald is only 24, so a four-year deal would put him in line for another huge payday while still in his prime.

The Cardinals don't want to pay huge money and be in the same position three years from now, so they rejected Parker's offer, and it is believed that the sides are discussing a five-year deal.

According to team sources, the Cardinals' proposal would make Fitzgerald the highest-paid player in team history and among the highest-paid non-quarterbacks in the league.

No specifics have been given to confirm that assertion.

Parker, following his usual custom, did not return phone calls. General Manager Rod Graves did not return a message.

Fitzgerald hit incentives that increased his salary to $14.6 million this year and $17.4 million in 2009. Those exorbitant salaries were designed to force the two sides back to the bargaining table, should Fitzgerald become a great player.

He's done that, making two Pro Bowls in four years.

Parker has considerable leverage in the deal, considering his client is due to make $14.6 million this year under the old pact. But a new deal that includes in excess of $25 million in guarantees might be hard to reject.

That's because Fitzgerald is scheduled to be with the team in 2009 at a salary of $17.4 million. The club would try to trade him, or cut him, before it paid that much. That money is not guaranteed, so Fitzgerald wouldn't receive it if he were to be cut or traded.

No team would trade for Fitzgerald unless it could get him to agree to a new contract.

For the Cardinals, that decision is a long way off. Graves has said several times that the team can accommodate Fitzgerald's salary this year.

But that won't be easy. Under Fitzgerald's current pact, the Cardinals would not have the cap space to do much in free agency, Graves has said, and some of their current players might be faced with taking pay cuts or being released.

The Cardinals have made the point to Parker and Fitzgerald. Coach Ken Whisenhunt reportedly met with Fitzgerald recently and told him that the team's off-season plans hinged on the restructuring.

Through this process, Fitzgerald has said all the right things. He loves playing in Arizona, he said, and wants to help the Cardinals win.

Cardinals officials view the current negotiations as a test of Fitzgerald's sincerity. They aren't asking Fitzgerald to accept a deal below his market value, they have said, but a restructured one that would free them to search for help in free agency and to re-sign their own players.

Outside linebacker Calvin Pace is expected to draw some attention from other teams, including the 49ers. Unless Fitzgerald restructures, the Cardinals would have a hard time retaining Pace.

Note
The Cardinals offered a low tender to offensive lineman Elton Brown, a restricted free agent. The offer is for $927,000 and gives the Cardinals the right to match an offer Brown might receive in free agency. If they choose not to match, the Cardinals would receive a fourth-round pick in return.

The Cardinals did not extend a tender offer to outside linebacker Darryl Blackstock, a third-round draft pick in 2005, making him an unrestricted free agent. Blackstock's agent, Brad Blank, said the Cardinals told him they couldn't afford to tender Blackstock because of the cap situation created by Fitzgerald's contract and efforts to re-sign Pace.

Blackstock has been a disappointment with the Cardinals but played better toward the end of the season.

There was no word on the tenders that the team offered to their other restricted free agents, including cornerback Eric Green and defensive end Antonio Smith, both starters
 

BullheadCardFan

Go for it
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2005
Posts
63,351
Reaction score
28,776
Location
Bullhead City, AZ
Graves has let this all the way up to the last day. This should have been already done. Actually the original contract should have never been written like it was.

Time to trade Fitz ?

I am leaning in that direction. Way too much money thrown at just one player.
 

Shane

Comin for you!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
69,128
Reaction score
39,143
Location
Las Vegas
If Parker is holding firm on only a 4 year contract with a huge ballooned salary in year four trying for another extension after year 3 then trade his azz yesterday.
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,247
Reaction score
11,852
If Parker is holding firm on only a 4 year contract with a huge ballooned salary in year four trying for another extension after year 3 then trade his azz yesterday.

You don't know this.

I doubt that it is the years that it is holding them back, it is the guaranteed dough.

I "think" that they are trying to negotiate a 5 year deal. So what does Parker do? He wants the amount of guaranteed money to go up in a 5 year deal vs. a 4 year deal. It is also my guess that the Cards aren't willing to pay much more than 26 or 27M in guarantees.
 

Shane

Comin for you!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
69,128
Reaction score
39,143
Location
Las Vegas
You don't know this.

I doubt that it is the years that it is holding them back, it is the guaranteed dough.

I "think" that they are trying to negotiate a 5 year deal. So what does Parker do? He wants the amount of guaranteed money to go up in a 5 year deal vs. a 4 year deal. It is also my guess that the Cards aren't willing to pay much more than 26 or 27M in guarantees.

Good I hope not. He isnt worth more then that. WR's overall just dont impact the game enough when you are only touching the ball at most about 7 times a game on average.

And your right I dont know that. But thats the way it sounded in the article. I know it said that they are wroking on a 5. But it shouldnt have a balloon payment in year 5 either. Last thing you need is to be in the perdicamnet again.
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,247
Reaction score
11,852
Good I hope not. He isnt worth more then that. WR's overall just dont impact the game enough when you are only touching the ball at most about 7 times a game on average.

And your right I dont know that. But thats the way it sounded in the article. I know it said that they are wroking on a 5. But it shouldnt have a balloon payment in year 5 either. Last thing you need is to be in the perdicamnet again.

Just about every NFL contract is written that way. Don't you guys remember how some here would pile on Graves because he wasn't "with the times" in writing NFL contracts, offering flat contracts year after year?

The longer that this drags out, the worse it looks on both sides.
 

joeshmo

Kangol Hat Aficionado
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Posts
17,247
Reaction score
1
Despite the title of the article it actually gave me hope.

1. Neither side returned phone calls to Somers. Meaning that neither side is negotiating very much through the press which means negotiations are still going well considering all things. Little tidbits here and there but overall no real direct comments.

2. They seem to have come to have comprimised on a 5 year deal. The amount of years like the article stated and I have been saying for some time was probably the biggest hurdle. I think they just jumped it.

3. The money seems to be there and Fitz agent himself hasnt ever said that was the issue, like I have said it has always been a structure issue. So now that the years are there and the money is there all they have to do is negotiate how the money is spread out over the 5 years in base salaries and how they want the Gauranteed spread out, meaning how much signing bonus, how much roster bonus in future years, how much option bonus.

I still think this deal gets done today or tommorow.
 

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
39,814
Reaction score
24,022
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
Despite the title of the article it actually gave me hope.

1. Neither side returned phone calls to Somers. Meaning that neither side is negotiating very much through the press which means negotiations are still going well considering all things. Little tidbits here and there but overall no real direct comments.

2. They seem to have come to have comprimised on a 5 year deal. The amount of years like the article stated and I have been saying for some time was probably the biggest hurdle. I think they just jumped it.

3. The money seems to be there and Fitz agent himself hasnt ever said that was the issue, like I have said it has always been a structure issue. So now that the years are there and the money is there all they have to do is negotiate how the money is spread out over the 5 years in base salaries and how they want the Gauranteed spread out, meaning how much signing bonus, how much roster bonus in future years, how much option bonus.

I still think this deal gets done today or tommorow.

By God, I hope you're right, Joe.
 

imaCafan

Next stop, Hall of Fame!
Joined
Aug 24, 2002
Posts
3,613
Reaction score
958
Location
Needles, Ca.
Despite the title of the article it actually gave me hope.

1. Neither side returned phone calls to Somers. Meaning that neither side is negotiating very much through the press which means negotiations are still going well considering all things. Little tidbits here and there but overall no real direct comments.

2. They seem to have come to have comprimised on a 5 year deal. The amount of years like the article stated and I have been saying for some time was probably the biggest hurdle. I think they just jumped it.

3. The money seems to be there and Fitz agent himself hasnt ever said that was the issue, like I have said it has always been a structure issue. So now that the years are there and the money is there all they have to do is negotiate how the money is spread out over the 5 years in base salaries and how they want the Gauranteed spread out, meaning how much signing bonus, how much roster bonus in future years, how much option bonus.

I still think this deal gets done today or tommorow.

They went home last night, went to bed, woke up this morning, went to the garage to get a hammer, and now today they will get together and "hammer out" the details and get this done!!!!!!
 

red desert

ASFN Addict
Joined
Mar 4, 2003
Posts
6,221
Reaction score
0
Location
A.B.Q. in da house
Despite the title of the article it actually gave me hope.

1. Neither side returned phone calls to Somers. Meaning that neither side is negotiating very much through the press which means negotiations are still going well considering all things. Little tidbits here and there but overall no real direct comments.

2. They seem to have come to have comprimised on a 5 year deal. The amount of years like the article stated and I have been saying for some time was probably the biggest hurdle. I think they just jumped it.

3. The money seems to be there and Fitz agent himself hasnt ever said that was the issue, like I have said it has always been a structure issue. So now that the years are there and the money is there all they have to do is negotiate how the money is spread out over the 5 years in base salaries and how they want the Gauranteed spread out, meaning how much signing bonus, how much roster bonus in future years, how much option bonus.

I still think this deal gets done today or tommorow.

Thats my thinking as well.
 

Cbus cardsfan

Back to Back ASFN FFL Champion
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
21,463
Reaction score
7,632
i don't see the reason for optimism in that article. It was pretty much just a state of affairs report.If true, Parker is the problem. No team is going to give a huge guarantee and then have to be basically in the same boat in 3 years. I don't blame Graves one bit for not accepting that offer. Fitz already has earned 20 mill, likley to get another 25-30 mill guaranteed in 4 years of playing, and wants to get back to the table ,and get somewhere like another 30-35(if things keep going like they are) in another 3 years. I can see a guy getting everything he can, but Parker is being a litlle ridiculous. I've completely changed my view on the negotiation. I was all for Fitz getting paid, and still am, but the Cards seem to be being more than fair in this one.
 

Skkorpion

Grey haired old Bird
LEGACY MEMBER
Supporting Member
Joined
May 9, 2002
Posts
11,026
Reaction score
5
Location
Sun City, AZ
I think/hope schmo is right. He usually is.

However, if Fitz really just wants to leave, the way to force it to happen fast is to not agree to a deal. That way, he gets his big cash this year and forces us to trade him next year, while we can get something for him.

We'll soon know.
 
Top