Spurs' kid outshines Nets' Kidd

sunsfn

Registered User
Joined
Oct 3, 2002
Posts
4,522
Reaction score
0
DREW SHARP: Spurs' kid outshines Nets' Kidd in NBA Finals opener

June 5, 2003

BY DREW SHARP
FREE PRESS COLUMNIST


SAN ANTONIO -- There's neither debate nor discussion over the top three names going in this month's NBA draft. Whatever the order, it's going to be LeBron James, Darko Milicic and Carmelo Anthony.

They're the can't-miss triplets.

The last time the first three selections were assured weeks in advance was 1994 when everyone knew Glenn Robinson, Jason Kidd and Grant Hill were ticketed to instant stardom. They would represent the cornerstones to the next generation of NBA champions.

But they've got no rings between them.

Robinson, the first selection overall, has become a competitive bust.

Hill, the third selection overall, going to the Pistons, has become a medical mystery.

"I guess it falls on me then, doesn't it?" said Kidd.

He has been dazzling throughout his nine-year career. But now he needs to dominate. Forget the eye-popping, no-look passes and magical sleight-of-hand with the basketball. How about consistently draining the 18-foot jumper?

Kidd couldn't Wednesday, but the kid could.

Tony Parker, at 21, is the fourth youngest player to ever participate in the NBA Finals. He was the youngest starting point guard in the league this season.

More important, he was the best point guard on the floor in Game 1 of the NBA Finals, getting the better of his long-rumored heir apparent in San Antonio.

Kidd didn't look like somebody worth $18 million. His perimeter range was worth about 18 cents.

That clang you heard wasn't another New Jersey jumper hitting iron. Rather it was all the premature hype of the best of the East giving the best of the West some decent competition crashing against hardened reality.

The Spurs' 101-89 victory marked the Western Conference's ninth straight over the Eastern Conference in the final round.

These NBA Finals have become a proving ground for Kidd.

He's one of the game's top 10 players. Flip a coin between him and Houston's Steve Francis. There's no disputing that you need a top 10 player to have a chance at qualifying for the championship series, but history has proven that you need a top-five talent as the anchor to get the ring.

It's up to Kidd if the Nets are to have any kind of chance. And with Kidd, it always comes back to his jump shot. He began the game confident, rifling in two jumpers in the game's first minute. But he soon cooled, forcing up shots and resembling the teasing Kidd we've all come to know and dismiss.

"There's no excuse of that kind of shooting," said Kidd regarding his 4-for-17 shooting performance. "But that's not always what I'm known for."

In the pivotal third quarter, Parker scored nine points compared to Kidd's two. And defensively, the quicker Parker did a pretty good job denying Kidd the ball, throwing the Nets' offensive rhythm off kilter.

Who's Kidding whom?

If this is what we can expect from Kidd then the Nets will be fortunate to win one game in this series.

"It's just the first game," Kidd said. "They threw some things at us that gave us a little difficulty. They played more zone than they normally do and we had some problems attacking it, but we'll work at making some adjustments."

But there's only so much of the truth that's adjustable. The East remains the league's punchline because the true difference makers reside in the West. Tim Duncan surgically dissected the Nets' interior defense in the second half. There's no reason not to doubt that the back-to-back league Most Valuable Player will continue his domination.

The postscript is more intriguing than the series' outcome itself.

There's more interest in this city in what Kidd will do next month rather than what he might do in the next week.

He will be the biggest unrestricted free agent on the market, and the Spurs will have $18 million worth of salary cap maneuverability thanks to David Robinson's impending retirement. They'll be able to offer Kidd a maximum $90 million deal, but the growing debate here is that the Spurs are better served not biting on Kidd or Jermaine O'Neal this summer and waiting for Kevin Garnett to go on the market in the summer of 2004 -- particularly if Parker continues to blossom into a reliable, if not spectacular performer at the point.

"I might have been a little jittery in the first half, but I've been pretty successful in the third quarter in these playoffs," said Parker, who finished with 16 points. "The pressure is always there, especially when you're playing for the championship and you're playing against the best point guard in the game."

But he wasn't the best point in this game.

Give Parker his props for handling the repetitive questioning regarding Kidd's future with a veteran's aplomb. He let his game do all the talking and the message sent is that the Spurs might be better off saving their money.

No kidding.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
46,462
Reaction score
16,990
Location
Round Rock, TX
I know this isn't about the article, but what is the fascination with Steve Francis? I mean, he's all right, but to say best PG in the league is a toss-up between those two? I don't even think Francis is top 3 in the league (Kidd, Payton and Steph)...
 

Mike Olbinski

Formerly Chandler Mike
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
16,396
Reaction score
13
Location
Phoenix, AZ
Originally posted by Chaplin
I know this isn't about the article, but what is the fascination with Steve Francis? I mean, he's all right, but to say best PG in the league is a toss-up between those two? I don't even think Francis is top 3 in the league (Kidd, Payton and Steph)...

I would put Francis above an aging Payton right now. He's great man...

Mike
 

schutd

ASFN Addict
Joined
Oct 15, 2002
Posts
6,246
Reaction score
2,175
Location
Charleston, SC
Originally posted by Chandler Mike
I would put Francis above an aging Payton right now. He's great man...

Mike

I don't know. He couldn't get a 7 foot 4 guy more than 10 or 12 points a game. He doesnt distribute the ball very well, especially to who should OBVIOUSLY be the foal of the offense, and he hasnt so much as sniffed the playoffs. I cant put a guy like that, regardless of ability in the top 3.

Besides, I hate him. Heh.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
S

sunsfn

Registered User
Joined
Oct 3, 2002
Posts
4,522
Reaction score
0
--------------------------------------------------------
I would put Francis above an aging Payton right now. He's great man...

Mike
-------------------------------------

Not sure I agree.

I believe that "part" of Rudys firing in Houston is because he could not control Francis as far as being a point guard.
They need to start running their offense through Ming.
Francis was not doing that very well at all.
It should have been obvious to him and it is not. :confused:

:wave:
 

Joe Mama

Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
9,501
Reaction score
964
Location
Gilbert, AZ
I think Steve Francis is incredibly overrated at this point. Don't get me wrong. He's a very good player, but there's no way I think he is a top 10 player. He has a world of talent, but he doesn't use his head when he plays. He's really more of a combo guard than a point guard.

He's one of the best rebounding guards in the NBA, but he only averages around 6 assists per game which didn't even put him in the top 10 in the NBA. On top of that he tied with Jason Kidd for most turnovers per game at 3.7. Jason Kidd averages more than 3 more assists per game though. Steve Francis' assists/turnover ratio is a pathetic 1.68. He was one of the worst starting point guards in the NBA last season in that department.

We'll see what happens when he plays second fiddle to Yao Ming next season. Whoever the new coach is will certainly run the offense through Yao. I think it will actually make Francis better.

Joe Mama
 

Charles V

Registered
Joined
Jun 13, 2002
Posts
155
Reaction score
0
Location
PHX
I know this isn't about the article, but what is the fascination with Steve Francis?

No doubt. I know that message boards arent an acurate slice of an NBA fan base, but Houston fans raked Steve through the coals after last season...many of them wishing that he could play more like Marbury.

I know people have dreams of turning PG's into SG's, but if there was ever a candidate for the switch it would be Steve Francis. Steve is a very good player, but I think he would be better suited at the 2 rather than the 1.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
556,083
Posts
5,431,712
Members
6,329
Latest member
cardinals2025
Top