pmacLean
Veteran
None of what you just posted actually can be defined as evidence. Blake Bortles was actually better than Gabbert immediately with a similar cast.
Utter hogwash
2013 Gabbert played 3 games ... so let's compare his 2012 with Bortles 2014
Games..Games
..................................Started..W/L....Cmp....Att....Cmp%..TD...TD%..Int Int%
Gabbert.2012.....10.........10......1/9......162....278...58.3......9....3.2.....6.....2.2
Bortles..2014......14.........13......3/10....280....475...58.9.....11...2.3....17.....3.6
What a remarkable difference.... why, Bortles must be the second coming to outdo Gabbert by that much (please note the INTs)
In 2014, everything else STILL sucked and Bortles did NO better than Gabbert... then they started changing MANAGEMENT and getting DECENT players and the difference widened... to say Bortles came in and clearly outdid him is pure lazy prejudice... and total rot to boot ... and there is the evidence, not some lazy prejudicial poppycock (I want to see if they mess with that word)
Last edited: